covid thiamine

Covid Notes: Thiamine Reduces Thrombosis and Mortality

6582 views

A recently published retrospective study showed ICU patients receiving thiamine therapy had a significantly reduced thrombosis and mortality rate compared to patients not treated with thiamine. The study, conducted in two hospitals in Saudi Arabia reviewed the cases of 738 critically ill Covid patients admitted to the ICU. As this was a retrospective study looking solely at electronic medical records, there was no determination of thiamine deficiency or clinical criteria to determine who received thiamine or at what dose. This was simply a review of all cases during a defined period of time that were admitted to the ICU and who, based upon clinical judgement of the treating physician, may have been prescribed thiamine.

Study Details

Among 738 patients, 83 had received IV or oral thiamine in doses ranging 50-200mg per day for an average of 7 days. This was in addition to whatever medical or pharmaceutical interventions provided. Using a statistical tool called a propensity score, the researchers then selected pair matches to those 83 patients for further analysis of several endpoints. The endpoints evaluated included:

  • Association between thiamine use as an adjunctive therapy with in-hospital and 30 day mortality
  • Duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay and complications such as
    • Acute kidney injury
    • Thrombosis
    • Respiratory failure
    • Acute liver injury

Results

Across all variables, patients who received thiamine faired significantly better than those who did not. The most striking findings included mortality and thrombosis reduction. Thiamine reduced in-hospital and 30-day mortality by 61% and 63%, respectively compared to propensity matched controls. Additionally, critically ill ICU patients who received thiamine were 81% less likely to develop thrombosis, and non-significantly less likely to develop kidney damage or liver damage. Inasmuch as thrombosis is major contributor to mortality with COVID, this finding is huge.

Things to Consider

As this was a retrospective study and there were no determinations regarding deficiency or guidelines regarding dosing or other treatment protocols given concurrently, it is difficult to fully appreciate the role of thiamine in COVID recovery by traditional research parameters. Nevertheless, if we look at the role of thiamine in energy metabolism, in immune function, in controlling hypoxia, it makes sense that no matter what other confounding variables may detract from or enhance recovery prospects, thiamine, by its very mechanisms of action, would improve outcomes; something that we have been proposing since well before the pandemic began. Maybe now, more will listen.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

Thiamine: A Missing Piece of the COVID-19 Treatment Puzzle?

13784 views

Earlier this year, Hormones Matter published two posts suggesting that thiamine could be helpful in treating COVID-19, one by Dr. Lonsdale focused on the role of thiamine in facilitating the energy metabolism needed to fight disease and one by me focused on thiamine’s potential to increase oxygen levels through the inhibition of carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes. Since the publication of these posts, new evidence has emerged that further supports the potential benefits of thiamine for COVID-19. This post reviews the new evidence and argues for the accelerated execution of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the potential of thiamine to slow the progression of COVID-19 in newly diagnosed outpatients.

Thiamine and COVID-19: New Evidence

The most important new data are: (1) a study which found that high-dose thiamine lowers the Th17 cell proinflammatory response believed to be associated with the COVID-19 cytokine storm and (2) data on mortality rates from two medical centers using the MATH+ protocol to treat COVID-19 hospitalized patients. I summarize each in turn.

  1. Modulation of Th17 proinflammatory response. Through a creative combination of in vivo and in vitro experiments, the authors of this study demonstrate that thiamine interrupts the cycle of inflammation believed to play a role in the cytokine storm associated with COVID-19, leading to reduced levels of IL-17 pro-inflammatory cytokines and increased levels of the anti-inflammatory IL-22 cytokines. They determined that a range of 74-474 mg daily of thiamine would achieve the desired response in COVID-19 patients. Notably, this study did not involve patients with COVID-19, but rather patients with alcohol use disorder, who also tend to experience a pro-inflammatory state characterized by elevated IL-17 levels. So thiamine’s effectiveness in preventing and treating COVID-19 still needs to be tested in a clinical setting. The study is in the pre-print phase only, and is currently under review by a peer-reviewed journal. This video by Dr. Mobeen Syed provides a helpful explanation of the study and its context.
  2. Reduced COVID-19 mortality rates in two hospitals using the MATH+ protocol. The MATH+ protocol for COVID-19 combines a range of substances to treat hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Methylprednisolone (a steroid), Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Thiamine, Heparin (a blood thinner) and several additional components, including melatonin, zinc, vitamin D, atorvastatin and famotidine. Grounded in the experience Dr. Paul Marik and his collaborators gained in treating patients with sepsis, and other emerging evidence, the protocol has been endorsed by a group of physicians known as the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance. The protocol is intended to be used as soon as hospitalized COVID-19 patients meet the criteria for oxygen supplementation. Dr. Marik’s version of the protocol, the EVMS Critical Care COVID-19 protocol, also includes recommendations for treatment at earlier phases of the disease and for prevention.

The MATH+ protocol has not been evaluated through a randomized controlled trial, but the authors have published a detailed scientific review of the protocol as well as data on the mortality of patients treated with the protocol.  According to their data, through July 20, 2020, the two hospitals using the protocol (United Memorial Medical Center, in Houston, TX, and Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, in Norfolk, Virginia) reported mortality rates for hospitalized COVID-19 patients of 4.4 and 6.1 percent, respectively. This compares with mortality rates for hospitalized COVID-19 patients of 15.6 to 32.0 percent reported in other studies.  Since this is not a formal controlled study, it is possible that explanations other than the use of the MATH+ protocol could account for the sharply lower mortality rates at the Houston and Norfolk hospitals. Nevertheless, the comparatively low mortality rates of the hospitals using the MATH+ protocols  represent very promising results.

Other recent articles suggesting a role for thiamine in treating COVID-19 include: an article on the potential role of B vitamins in treating COVID-19, a review of the potential of vitamins to treat COVID-19, and an article focused on famotidine, melatonin and thiamine. Many of the studies on the potential role of thiamine in treating COVID-19 are summarized in this review. This article focuses on the potential of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide to prevent kidney damage from COVID-19.  As noted in my earlier post, an in vitro study suggests that thiamine may be nearly as effective as acetazolamide in inhibiting carbonic anhydrase isoenzymes.

Potential Mechanisms Linking Thiamine Deficiency to COVID-19

The exact mechanism through which thiamine may be contributing to the results discussed above is unclear. One potential pathway is thiamine deficiency, which is fairly common in severely ill patients and discussed by the authors of both the Th17 research paper and the scientific review of the MATH+ protocol. As the scientific review of the MATH+ protocol observes:

The human adult can store around 30 mg of thiamine in muscle tissue, liver and kidneys, however, these stores can become depleted in as little as 18 days after the cessation of thiamine intake. A thiamine deficiency syndrome, beriberi, bears a number of similarities to sepsis, including peripheral vasodilation, cardiac dysfunction, and elevated lactate levels. In critical illness, the prevalence of thiamine deficiency is 10–20% upon admission and can increase up to 71% during ICU stay, suggesting rapid depletion of this vitamin.

At the same time, however, the authors noted that “[b]ased on limited data, no association was detected between thiamine levels, markers of oxidative stress and mortality” in two studies.”   

There could also be benefits in using thiamine as part of a combination protocol with other agents. For example, the authors of the MATH+ scientific review note that the combined administration of thiamine and steroids may help to enhance the anti-inflammatory properties of steroids. “In experimental rheumatoid arthritis, thiamine increased the ability of corticosteroids to suppress production of TNF-á and IL-6.”

An intriguing role for thiamine in countering the inflammation associated with some viruses is raised by the authors of the paper on the Th17 proinflammatory response. They cite in vitro research which found, using feline models that some viruses rely on a thiamine transport protein in the disease cycle. In theory, occupying the thiamine transporter by providing thiamine to thiamine-deficient individuals could inhibit a virus which relied on this same transporter. While not specifically addressed in the paper, this raises the question of whether the use of high doses of thiamine in individuals without a deficiency could have a similar effect in interrupting the disease cycle of a virus that depends on the thiamine transporter.

Neither the Th17 study nor the scientific review of the MATH+ protocol mention thiamine’s role as a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, but it is noted in two of the other articles referenced above as potentially contributing to reduced hypoxia. This pathway needs further study. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors produce carbon dioxide, which can help to reduce the hypoxic conditions that produce inflammation. One way is through increased respiration.  Several other mechanisms for carbon dioxide’s protective effects are summarized in this article:

Numerous other mechanisms potentially exist whereby CO2 protects the tissues from hypoxic-ischemic damage. An increase in blood pCO2 shifts the oxygen hemoglobin dissociation curve to the right (Bohr effect), the result of which is a decrease in the affinity of hemoglobin for oxygen. Therefore, at the capillary level, CO2 would tend to raise pO2, increase the gradient for any given oxyhemoglobin saturation, and facilitate transfer of O2 to the tissue for oxidative processes. CO2 might also preserve cardiac function during systemic hypoxia. The inhibition of systemic lactate production by CO2 inhalation during hypoxia would serve to maintain optimal cardiovascular function.

Research Needed

Given the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the expected challenges associated with the combined burden of flu and COVID-19 on hospitals this fall and winter, it is important to test all plausible treatment avenues for COVID-19.  The data reviewed in this post add to the evidence base supporting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test whether thiamine – alone or in combination with other agents – could help to slow the progression of COVID-19 and/or mitigate the cytokine storm associated with some of its worst effects.

Cognizant of the prevailing view that RCTs are the best way to build evidence about the effects of medical treatment, the authors of the scientific review of the MATH+ protocol specifically discuss their decision to forgo an RCT. They argue that the clinical value of each of the treatments included in their protocol has been well established and that they therefore do not have the clinical equipoise (“the belief by the investigator that neither intervention in the control or experimental group is more effective”) necessary to justify a trial. In essence, they argue that it would be unethical to deprive patients facing a deadly disease of treatments they believe to be effective. Instead, they are pursuing a different research approach: “the formation of a patient registry to measure and compare the outcomes of patients treated with MATH+, not only against the prevailing ‘supportive-care only’ strategy, but also against other novel proposed treatment approaches employed throughout the country and world.”

Even if the necessary clinical equipoise is not available to justify an RCT in hospitalized patients, I would argue that there IS sufficient clinical equipoise to justify an RCT testing the effects of thiamine and other agents in slowing the progression of COVID-19 in newly diagnosed outpatients. While there is a theoretical basis for believing thiamine could be helpful, we won’t know whether and to what extent it is helpful in a real-world setting until a trial is done. One approach would be to test a combination therapy that relies on oral versions of many of the substances used in the MATH+ protocol, such as vitamin C, thiamine, heparin or another blood thinner such as aspirin, vitamin D, melatonin, famotidine, and zinc. Due to concerns about possible harms resulting from the administration of a steroid too early in the progression of COVID-19, it would likely be advisable to omit a steroid from the earliest stages of treatment. The rationale for avoiding steroids in non-critically ill COVID-19 patients is discussed in the September 2, 2020 World Health Organization guidelines on the use of corticosteroids for COVID-19.

Many of these substances are already being evaluated in trials to assess their effectiveness in treating COVID-19, as reflected in the ClinicalTrials.gov database.  But not thiamine.

What are we waiting for?

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

Image by Alexas_Fotos from Pixabay.

COVID Notes: Random Thoughts On Brain and Immune Function

3994 views

This is the third in a series of short posts adapted from Twitter threads contemplating various aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The first two posts can be found here and here, and of course, on Twitter.

COVID, the Brain, and Immune Function

The neuroinvasive potential of SARS‐CoV2 may play a role in the respiratory failure of COVID‐19 patients.

“The most characteristic symptom of patients with COVID‐19 is respiratory distress, and most of the patients admitted to the intensive care could not breathe spontaneously…”

…where the brainstem was heavily infected…”

Key sentence: could not breathe spontaneously and brainstem involvement. Reading further we get thalamic involvement – as was reported in COVID-19–associated Acute Hemorrhagic Necrotizing Encephalopathy: CT and MRI Features.

As soon as I see this pattern, brainstem degradation>thalamic involvement, I immediately think dysautonomia>beriberi>thiamine deficiency>mito-hypoxia>disrupted immune function>inflammation overkill>leaky BBB >leaky junctions.

Then a few, more philosophical questions, niggle in the background. I have long had this theory that these pathogens have always already been with us and are just ‘activated’ when the circumstances align. I have no real basis for this and certainly much evidence against it.

But the idea remains – what if everything was already there? That the threats that we face are not entirely external but internal as well. This doesn’t mean that there are not external pathogens to which we fall prey, there absolutely are, but what if we constitutionally mirror those pathogens – they exist in us already but remain quiescent, mostly, until some confluence of events activates them.

If that were the case, then the potential for any pathogen to ‘reach’ any part of the body, the brain included, would not be so much about the uniqueness of the pathogen, although that would play a role certainly, but more about the uniqueness of the ‘host’.

This would then bring us back to Matzinger’s danger theory, where the immune system has advanced beyond the overly simplistic self vs non-self model – because everything is self, the pathogens were always already a part of us, and it is our response to them that engenders danger.

That brings us back to host response being the key variable to address with any illness. And with that, two questions. 1) what does the individual need to survive/be healthy and 2) are they getting it?

Reframed for this pandemic. 1) What molecular resources does the patient require to mount an effective immune response, with the appropriate amount of inflammation at the appropriate time?  2) Are they getting them? Likely they are not, because they are ill, sometimes seriously.

Reframed one more time. 1) What are the molecular resources one needs to beat this illness altogether – to be an asymptomatic carrier? 2) Are they getting them?

In this regard, everything comes back to host resources availability. That places the determinants of health versus illness squarely onto host health or more specifically, host mitochondrial health because the question always comes back to mitochondrial fitness, to the energy/ATP needed to either stave off illness altogether or fight it and survive if this fails.

Then where the pathogen attacks becomes an equation that includes equal parts pathogen to host variability e.g. host genetics/epigenetics/diet/lifestyle/environment etc., which is moderated by energy availability.

And from that perspective, as meandering and incompletely argued as it was, maybe it still provides a clue to how we fight this – bolster host defenses. Maybe that’s too simple in the age of technology. Maybe not.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, and like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

COVID-19 and Thiamine: An Interview with Dr. Derrick Lonsdale

9873 views

In the summer 2013, a geneticist we were seeing for my daughter ordered a test. Little did I know that test would contribute to a change in the course of my daughter’s life as well as a new area of study and advocacy for my career. This is my first time to write for Hormones Matter, so let me start by introducing myself. I am Kristi Wees and I am a pediatric patient advocate with EmpoweredAdvocacy.com as well as a national consultant for patient advocacy, empowerment, and engagement in the field of pediatric genetics. I was trained as a chemist at Penn State University with graduate training at UCLA. It was the journey that my daughter’s health took our family on that made me realize exactly why I had studied chemistry.

Fast forward to 2020, nearly 7 years later and now a pandemic with COVID-19, and I again realize how that 2013 test has sent us on an incredible journey. That 2013 test was for transketolase, which is a blood test to determine a vitamin (thiamine, B1) insufficiency. At the time, my daughter was struggling with autistic-like behaviors, severe fatigue, suspected mitochondrial disease, gastrointestinal concerns, severe food intolerances, and chemical sensitivities. The future looked bleak and hopeless.

After this test result came back, I began to search the literature about thiamine and found the work of Dr. Derrick Lonsdale. With guidance and a prescription from our medical team, we began our daughter on thiamine supplementation. In 2016,  I had the distinct honor of meeting Dr. Lonsdale in person. In 2019, I had the honor of interviewing him with Patricia Lemer for an episode called, “I Have A Child Who…Has Tantrums”.

Dr. Lonsdale
Our first meeting in 2016, from left to right: Kristi Wees (author of this post), Dr. Derrick Lonsdale, and Patricia Lemer (author of Outsmarting Autism).

A few weeks ago, I was reading the medical literature (here, here, and here) and watching anecdotal reports (here) regarding COVID-19 and began to see some clues that made me think of Dr. Lonsdale’s work on thiamine. I reached out to him via email and he shared with me that he too was seeing similar red flags and that he was frustrated because at 96 years old, and having dedicated his life to research on this vitamin, he believed it could be helping so many critically ill patients. He asked if I had any ideas about how to help him get the word out.

Here is the idea we came up with: a recorded interview. Dr. Lonsdale is a gentleman with whom I have come to know as a friend, mentor, and researcher and whose body of work helped my child thrive. I believe he possesses wisdom that has been forgotten and largely ignored by modern medicine. Listen to the interview, you won’t be disappointed.

Interview With Dr. Derrick Lonsdale: Thoughts on COVID-19

Dr. Derrick Lonsdale’s thoughts on COVID19 from Empowered Advocacy on Vimeo.

Shortly after releasing the video last week I came across this study: Intravenous Thiamine Is Associated With Increased Oxygen Consumption in Critically Ill Patients With Preserved Cardiac Index. Which again confirms Dr. Lonsdale’s conviction that thiamine can greatly improve the current situation in many ICU’s nationwide.

After treatment with thiamine, and many dietary, environmental and lifestyle changes, plus a whole lot of answered prayers, my daughter is thriving today with no residual behavioral, medical, neurological, developmental or learning challenges. Could thiamine also help overcome COVID-19? Possibly.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter.