crohn's disease

Gastrointestinal Disease and Thiamine

12331 views

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract, long thought to be specific only to the process of digestion, starts at the mouth and ends at the anus. Modern research has revealed that it has a very complex relationship with the rest of the body, especially the brain, and this post is aimed at giving the reader a glimpse of this research.

The Impact of Medication on the GI Tract

Every year many new medications are approved for clinical use, several of which can cause clinically significant GI tract toxicity. An article in the medical literature describes the drug-induced injury to the fragile lining of the tract. A drug by the name of Flagyl is used for resistant bacterial infections. Its chemical name is metronidazole and occasionally it results in the complication of encephalopathy (brain disease). It has been proposed that the adverse effects of the drug may be due wholly or in part to its conversion to a thiamine analog (the drug has a similar formula to thiamine and acts as an antagonist to the action of the vitamin). It seems that this happens enough that a Metronidazole Toxicity group has been formed online and has a considerable number of people with complaints regarding the use of this drug. Because the encephalopathy is said to be uncommon, it is apparently accepted as an occasional side effect, even though many people have been crippled from its use. The number of people reporting serious symptoms in the Toxicity group tends to negate the conclusions of officialdom that this encephalopathy is “uncommon, if not rare”.

Thiamine Deficiency and Obesity

This is defined by a formula known as the body mass index. Obesity is a growing worldwide epidemic currently affecting one in 10 adults. In the United States the incidences is as high as 40%. A publication claims that the only proven long-term treatment of severe obesity is surgical modification of the gastrointestinal anatomy, termed bariatric surgery. Complications are seen in patients who fail to follow the recommended changes in lifestyle. They include nausea, vomiting, so-called dumping syndrome, acid reflux and nutritional deficiencies. The authors note that “despite caloric density, the diet of patients prior to bariatric surgery is often of poor nutrient quality“. Unfortunately it needs to be pointed out that it is exactly why they became obese in the first place. Bariatric surgery is “shutting the stable door after the horse has gone”. Although obesity has been viewed traditionally as a disease of excess nutrition, the evidence suggests that it may also be a disease of malnutrition. Thiamine deficiency (TD) was found in as many as 29% of obese patients seeking bariatric surgery. They can present with vague signs and symptoms. In many posts on this website it has been pointed out that high calorie malnutrition is a widespread scourge in America and is responsible for the high incidence of obesity. The “vague signs and symptoms” are typical of early TD (beriberi) and are often misdiagnosed as psychosomatic.

Constipation or Diarrhea

The commonest form of bypass surgery for obesity, without going into the details, is known as Roux-en-Y. I do not know the reason for this nomenclature, but for surgeons it defines the technique. A publication in the medical literature described thiamine deficiency after gastric bypass and hypothesized that this is common. Of 151 patients, 27 met the criteria for thiamine deficiency, a prevalence of 18%. Eleven of these patients reported constipation after the surgery and treatment with thiamine improved it.

A 29-year-old patient has been described who had experienced sudden blindness and a disturbance of consciousness after two months of chronic diarrhea and minimal food intake. Amongst other physical signs, hemorrhages were seen in the eye. Leaking of blood from capillaries has long been recognized as a phenomenon that might be found in thiamine deficiency. It is of particular interest that the examination of cerebrospinal fluid revealed it to be normal, but magnetic resonance imaging showed changes that were interpreted as typical of thiamine deficiency. After administration of intravenously administered thiamine, both visual acuity and the visual field rapidly improved with the simultaneous recovery of consciousness. No indication was provided to explain a two-month period of diarrhea, although it was accompanied by “minimal food intake”.

A patient with Crohn’s disease and long-standing diarrhea resulted in combined thiamine and magnesium deficiency. Despite massive doses of thiamine given intravenously the symptoms of the deficiency could not be suppressed until the magnesium deficiency was also corrected. Many posts on Hormones Matter have discussed the relationship of magnesium with thiamine. Both of them work together as cofactors for a number of vitally important enzymes that govern energy metabolism. Obviously, literally any lapse of health can occur if energy is insufficient to meet the demands of living. Therefore, it is possible to understand that fatigue and other disorders related to ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease are the manifestation of an intracellular mild thiamine deficiency.

It is important to note that, in spite of finding the levels of thiamine and thiamine pyrophosphate in the blood to be normal, 10 patients out of 12 showed complete regression of fatigue and 2 patients showed partial regression when thiamine was administered. Note the doses of thiamine that were given. They ranged from 600 to 1500 mg/day given by mouth. The thing to understand here is that this was not simple vitamin replacement. These authors were using thiamine as a completely non-toxic drug, revealing genuine pioneering. Other authors have noted that micronutrient deficiencies occur in Crohn’s disease. They reported two patients with Crohn’s disease who complained of sudden-onset eye and brain dysfunction and confusion while receiving prolonged total parenteral nutrition. Magnetic resonance imaging allowed definitive diagnosis of Wernicke encephalopathy, a well-known brain disease occurring as a result of thiamine deficiency.

The Gut – Brain Connection

Within the last decade, the complement of bacteria living in the human bowel, now known as the gut microbiome, has become a focus of attention. The GI tract was once regarded simply as a digestive organ, but recent research has led to finding that the microbiome may have an impact on human health and disease. Surprisingly, it has become a focus of research for those interested in the brain and behavior. Multiple routes of communication between the gut and the brain have been established. Recently the gut microbiota (the complement of bacteria) has been profiled in a variety of conditions, including autism, major depression and Parkinson’s disease. Of course, there is still debate as to whether or not the changes observed are primary in causing the disease or merely a reflection of it. Other authors have raised the question of the importance of the microbiota in the pathology associated with autism, dementia, mood disorders and schizophrenia. It is interesting that the GI microbiome has been regarded as a complex ecosystem that reportedly establishes a symbiotic mutually beneficial relation with the host. It is said to be rather stable in health, but affected by age, drugs, diet, alcohol and smoking. Smoking leads to modifications of the bacterial complement and is linked with absence of a protective effect toward ulcerative colitis, and deleterious for Crohn’s disease.

An interesting slant has been placed on this problem of relationship between the host and the bacteria which make up the microbiome. It is pointed out that thiamine is an essential cofactor for all organisms, including bacteria and the role that gut microbes play in modulating thiamine availability is poorly understood. Little is known about how thiamine impacts the stability of microbial gut communities. In order to study this, a model gut microbe (Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron) was chosen. The study showed that thiamine acquisition mechanisms used by this microorganism not only are critical for its physiology and fitness but also provide the opportunity to model how other gut microbes may respond to the shifting availability of thiamine in the gut. Importance of this means that the variation in the ability of gut microbes to transport, synthesize and compete for thiamine is expected to impact on the structure and stability of the microbiota. The authors conclude that this variation may have both direct and indirect effects on human health.

The Role of Energy Metabolism

The question of whether bacterial changes in the gut are primary or secondary makes us think of which is the “chicken” and which is the “egg”. Bacteria are complex one-celled organisms and they require energy to perform their normal function, just the same as our body cells. Therefore, thiamine is as important to bacteria as it is to us, bringing us back to considering the frontier of medical thinking that energy metabolism is the core issue of health and disease.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter.

Image by Andrew Martin from Pixabay.

This article was published originally on May 6, 2019. 

Birth Control and Crohn’s Disease: Doctors Have It All Wrong

10998 views

It’s funny how clearly some mundane memories stick in your mind. I still recall the first time I took my car in for an instant oil-change. The shop’s marketing had spoken to my heart with a promise to have me in-and-out in under 10 minutes. If I wasn’t already hooked, something about navigating my car over the huge hole in the floor appealed to the little boy inside me, and, in fact, the entire experience was pretty pleasant… right up until the technician approached my window at the eight-minute mark.

“You’re going to need a new valve soon, and you’re air filter is really dirty. Would you like for me to replace these today?”

He was carrying the dirty filter and PCV valve as proof. I thought to myself, “They’ve been riding in a car engine. Of course, they’re dirty!” After he told me the cost, I politely declined. I’m not really a car guy, but I suspected I could get them cheaper elsewhere.

I’m skeptical anytime I know someone is trying to sell me something. That doesn’t make me unique; it makes me human. That’s why word-of-mouth advertising is so effective. If a friend (or even a stranger on Yelp) tells us something is great and we know they aren’t being paid to say so, it carries much more weight than that same message coming from someone who stands to benefit from it.

That air filter, though. It was nasty! So, I drove directly to a parts store, and it was indeed about half the cost. My inner imp felt justified.

A few thousand miles later I returned to the same shop for another oil change. (The sacrifices we make in the name of ‘instant’). Imagine my surprise when the eight-minute interlude again included the same air filter I had just replaced. On the Scale of Betrayal, the technician was hardly Judas, but I still vowed never to take my car there again.

In my opinion, that’s the definition of a healthy skepticism, one that steers us clear of people who don’t have our best interests in mind.

What’s Behind the Message?

“Life is pain, Highness. Anyone who says differently is selling something.”

Granted, the Man in Black was more than a little bitter when he uttered those famous words to Buttercup in The Princess Bride, but filter out the resentfulness, and you still have a grain of truth. In the oil change shop, it’s easy to spot the salesman’s motivation, but in some scenarios it’s difficult to spot the salesman, much less his/her motivation.

That healthy skepticism may never be more absent than when we visit the doctor. Ironically, because of the odd paradigm of the medical industry, that is precisely when it should be at its sharpest. I can’t think of another scenario where the consumer of the product relies completely on someone else to make the purchase decision. Perhaps our skepticism is alleviated because we believe the physician has taken a non-binding oath to ‘first do no harm.’ However, about one out of every five medical students actually reports taking no oath at all.

With or without the oath, we, the consumer, will be the ones taking the treatment they prescribe. We will be the ones living with the consequences, good or bad. Given that those consequences are all too often chronic or deadly, we should absolutely question a doctor’s reasoning and motivation.

Questioning Consensus

Crohn’s Disease affects absorption on the surface of the intestine, which can diminish the effectiveness of hormonal birth control. In this scenario, the prevailing consensus among doctors is to counter the affect Crohn’s has on The Pill by switching the patient to a higher dosage. In the long run, this can be devastating for the patient.

Unfortunately, this often the MO for dealing with problems in the medical industry. You either increase the dosage, or you prescribe something ‘off-label,’ especially when it comes to The Pill.

Hormonal contraceptives are prescribed off-label to treat everything from acne and irregular periods to PCOS and Multiple Sclerosis. But, think for a moment about what ‘off-label’ means. It means the prescribed drug hasn’t been clinically proven safe or effective for this particular use. It means treatment by consensus, rather than sound science. Alarmingly, a recent study published in Obstetrics and Gynecology revealed that a full two-thirds of practices in their specialty were based on consensus rather than ‘good and consistent scientific evidence.’

Proactive in the Wrong Direction

Recognizing the effects of Crohn’s Disease on the intestine and boosting a young woman’s birth control may seem very proactive, but it doesn’t take into account the big picture. In fact, it’s like admiring the mountainous road behind the Mona Lisa while missing her smile.

Surprisingly few doctors recognize that birth control could have actually triggered her disease despite the fact that the number of Crohn’s Disease cases exploded since the introduction of birth control pills.

In 2015, Harvard researchers conducted a massive study of nearly a quarter-million health records and discovered that women who took hormonal birth control for five years, more than tripled their risk of developing Crohn’s Disease.

But really, it shouldn’t have taken a major Harvard study for doctors to consider the link to irritable bowel disease. After all, nausea and upset stomach are among the most common complaints after starting birth control.

Estrogen is known to modify permeability and inflammation of the gut, and synthetic estrogen’s affect is unquestionably deleterious. Interestingly, the same study found women who take hormone replacement therapy face a 74% increased risk of ulcerative colitis, another irritable bowel disease.

Nothing New Under the Sun

News outlets hailed the Harvard study as groundbreaking. Any health periodical worth its weight in feathers ran an article on the study’s new findings. However, one only needs to read the study’s references to see how little ground it broke.

Citations and the year they were published, include (Condensed titles): Regional enteritis: possible association with oral contraceptives, 1969; Small intestine disease and oral contraceptive agents, 1973; Intestinal complications during the use of oral contraceptives, 1976; Colonic Crohn’s disease and use of oral contraception, 1984; The risk of oral contraceptives in the etiology of inflammatory bowel disease, 2008.

After a 1999 study associated hormonal contraceptive use as a high risk factor for a relapse in Crohn’s disease, Gut British Medical Journal published evidence that not only supported these findings, but also demonstrated a significant change in gender ratio, the incidence of female diagnoses compared to males jumped dramatically after the introduction of birth control pills.

Ultimately, the Harvard study was a massive population based study that did little more than confirm what researchers had known (or at least suspected) since 1969.

In his testimony at the Nelson Pill Hearings (1970), Dr. Philip Ball detailed how The Pill affects nearly every tissue in a woman’s body, and then offered this food for thought:

“I believe that we physicians are so used to administering very potent medications to very serious disease problems, we have not really yet learned it is a totally different circumstance to administer powerful but nonessential drugs chronically to healthy young women, as is done in contraceptive pill administration. It is of no relevance to say that the pill causes less trouble than cigarette smoking – doctors do not prescribe cigarettes. In fact, I take women off tobacco also. It is not sensible to say that birth control pills are safer than pregnancy – we don’t prescribe pregnancy. The question is simply, are the pills safer than the diaphragm or safer than the foams or rubber prophylactics? And the answer is clearly no.

“We have had much talk in our land about preserving our environment or improving our quality of life or preventing pollution of our country. The administration of birth control pills…may be termed an internal pollution by chemicals (that will) interfere with a woman’s quality of life.”

Let Those with Crohn’s Beware

Common sense and science tell us that hormonal contraceptives probably aren’t a great idea for someone with Crohn’s Disease (or someone with a family history of Crohn’s). Yet, we’ve already seen that the consensus is to increase the dosage of synthetic estrogen for these patients.

How can this be? And, what does it have to do with a speedy oil change?

Clearly, physicians aren’t receiving a commission or bonuses for prescribing drugs, but that’s not to say they aren’t influenced by pharmaceutical companies in much the same way the oil change technician was influenced by his employers. Let’s consider the commonalities of training, incentives, and pressure to perform.

Training – Drug manufacturers begin exerting influence on medical professionals early in their academic careers. These unwitting students are typically unaware of the biases that could be shaping the way they approach their future practices.

In her wonderful book, The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It, Marcia Angell, M.D. writes extensively about Big Pharma’s influence on medical education. She described the industry’s relationship with universities this way:

“The Reagan years and Bayh-Dole also transformed the ethos of medical schools and teaching hospitals. These nonprofit institutions started to see themselves as “partners” of industry, and they became just as enthusiastic as any entrepreneur about the opportunities to parlay their discoveries into financial gain. Faculty researchers were encouraged to obtain patents on their work (which were assigned to their universities), and they shared in the royalties. Many medical schools and teaching hospitals set up “technology transfer” offices to help in this activity and capitalize on faculty discoveries… One of the results has been a growing pro-industry bias in medical research—exactly where such bias doesn’t belong.”

As a former editor of the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Angell became keenly aware of the pharmaceutical industry’s influence on medical education, and it doesn’t end with the medical schools. Her book offers a comprehensive explanation of how the industry moved to virtually lock down control of continuing medical education, which doctors are required to take each year in order to maintain their licenses.

Incentives – Just for fun, watch an hour of television and don’t skip the commercials. In fact, count them. What percentage do you think will be prescription drug commercials?

I know it sounds more nausea-inducing than fun, but here’s the point. Big Pharma spends $3 billion dollars-per-year advertising to consumers. (We can also thank Reagan-era deregulation for direct-to-consumer marketing). As you think about those ubiquitous commercials and how far $3 billion dollars will go, consider this – Big Pharma spends 8 times as much on marketing directly to healthcare professionals, $24 billion annually.

The Food and Drug Administration, American Medical Association, and (PhRMA) Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America have all established guidelines and regulations in an attempt to limit gifts from the drug industry to healthcare professionals. The thought is that strictly limiting gifts will eliminate the influence drug companies have over those who write the scripts. A pharma sales rep bringing lunch to the doctor’s staff on Tuesday couldn’t possibly motivate him/her to prescribe more of their drug, right?

A recent study published in JAMA Internal Medicine found that, indeed, even a single $20 meal sponsored by a drug company can influence a doctor’s prescribing habits, and the impact increases with each meal. According to NBC News:

“Those who got four or more meals relating to the four drugs [in the study] prescribed Crestor nearly twice as often as doctors who didn’t get the free meals; Bystolic more than five times as often, Benicar more than four times as often and Pristig 3.4 times as often.”

These small gifts translate to a huge return on investment. The study found that when a drug company spends $13 on a doctor, they see 94 additional days of prescriptions for brand-name anticoagulants and additional 107 days for brand-name drugs to treat diabetes.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service track industry payments to healthcare professionals, and have made their database accessible to the public. You can discover if your physician receives payments from pharmaceutical companies and, if so, how much, by visiting: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov. ProPublica also created an interesting search tool using the same data, which you can utilize by visiting: https://projects.propublica.org/docdollars/.

Pressure to Perform – You may feel happy for Joe Mechanic when he gets Employee of the Month for selling the most air filters, but how would you feel about drug companies tracking your doctor’s performance? In fact, that’s exactly what’s happening.

Pharmaceutical companies buy physician prescribing data from companies like IMS Health. These weekly lists track every prescription written by healthcare professionals in the United States. Physician and patient names aren’t included, but each prescription does include the doctor’s Drug Enforcement Administration ID number. Interestingly, the American Medical Association makes about $20 million per year selling the master file of its physician database, which includes their DEA number.

By combining these two databases, the drug companies can see precisely how frequently each doctor prescribes their drug compared to the competition. Then, the sales reps can tailor their pitch and the amount of pressure to apply to each doctor.

Most doctors seem to realize that the gifts and pressure are influential but think that they are immune. Shannon Brownlee offered this perspective:

“Most physicians make “I’m OK, you’re not” assumptions about their profession’s susceptibility to such tactics. In one survey, 61 percent of the residents at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center reported that they themselves are unmoved by drug company gifts. But when asked if they thought their colleagues were swayed, 84 percent said yes.”

Signs of their influence over healthcare professionals are everywhere. How else would you explain raising the dosage on birth control for Crohn’s patients as the consensus? Does it seem reasonable that seven out of ten people you meet today are taking a prescription, and 20% of them are taking at least five prescriptions?!

I suppose we should just be thankful humans don’t need air filters.

#1
In the Name of The Pill

37 customer reviews

In the Name of The Pill*

by Mike Gaskins

The FDA approved The Pill despite it not being proven safe. Today, it has been linked to everything from blood clots and cancer to lupus and Crohn’s disease — and still has not been proven safe.
This book explores the medical and historical disconnects that brought us to this point.




 Price: $ 17.95

Buy now at Amazon*

Price incl. VAT., Excl. Shipping

Last updated on October 21, 2023 at 9:38 pm – Image source: Amazon Affiliate Program. All statements without guarantee.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter.

Photo Credit: Akiragiulia / Pixabay

This article was first published in December 2017.

 

Fatigue, Hair Loss, Diarrhea: Just Hormones or Crohn’s Disease?

15895 views

Instead of wondering where I’d be going out for the weekend, much of my twenty-first year was spent wondering “Why is my hair thinning so much?” and “Why am I having diarrhea every day?” The last thought on my mind was a diagnosis of Crohn’s disease – an incurable inflammatory bowel disease. Now unfortunately, even amidst trying to finish college and plan a wedding, the word Crohn’s, as well as its bodily effects, are on my mind every single day.

On a quest to find true health, I became very invested in learning all I could about natural living and healing about two years ago. Ironically, around the time I began to become proactive towards my health, I noticed my health begin to deteriorate in a number of ways.

What I had assumed to be due to the normal stress of college life, a tumultuous relationship and the fast-paced life of a nanny, I began suffering from chronic fatigue, night sweats, consistently cold hands and feet, unexplained weight loss, and now chronic diarrhea to add to my laundry list of health concerns a person my age shouldn’t be having. Could my adrenals be worn down? Am I eating enough? Drinking enough water? Do I have a thyroid issue?

Hypothyroidism?

My family has a history of issues with hypothyroidism – my mother and maternal grandmother both struggle with maintaining correct hormonal balance. When my mother suggested this as a possibility to me, I figured after two years of wondering, it was time to investigate.

At a local health expo I attended last fall, I went to an informational seminar on thyroid health – all of the symptoms of poor thyroid health resonated so deeply to me. I was convinced, at this point, that this was the missing piece to my healthy body puzzle. I went out and bought an iodine supplement, but decided to hold off on taking it until I got official bloodwork done to confirm my self-diagnosis.

I cashed in on a general physical as an excuse to get some bloodwork done with my pediatrician (regrettably, I have not found a general practitioner yet). I requested a variety of tests: a full thyroid panel, a check on my adrenals, selenium, iron, vitamins, DHEA sulfate and more. Fully expecting my test results to come back saying I had poor thyroid function, much to my surprise I received a rather concerned phone call from my doctor.

Vitamin Deficient, Iron Deficient, Protein Deficient

“Your thyroid panel came back normal, but your iron is dangerously low; you are severely anemic and you need to begin on iron supplement immediately,” he said. I had not been anemic since I was four years old, but I recalled craving crushed ice when I was anemic, and I had not craved this in years. This news was shocking to me, but even more shocking was his further explanation. “You are also extremely deficient in vitamins C and D, as well as showing signs of malnutrition, such as not enough protein. Your white blood cell count is also concerning; it is what we call ‘immature,’ which shows that your body is fighting something.”

Dumbfounded, I had little clue as to how to process this information. How could I be showing signs of malnutrition? I eat all the time, and eat meat every day. The diagnosis made no sense to me. My doctor expressed concern of an irritable bowel syndrome, such as ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease, as his suspicion was that I was not properly absorbing the nutrients I was consuming.

The Diagnosis: Crohn’s Disease

Following a colonoscopy, an endoscopy and further bloodwork, my diagnosis was confirmed – Crohn’s disease.

My doctor explained Crohn’s to me as my immune system attacking my own digestive tract, supposedly without explanation.

Tacking the word ‘disease’ on the end of any diagnosis is devastating, to say the least, especially at the age of 21. But when a professional can’t seem to articulate a probable cause to your chronic disease, perhaps the most overwhelming sensation is confusion. With all of my efforts to live consciously and support my immune system, the news of having an autoimmune disease has been especially emotional and frustrating. While I am grateful my hormones are in balance, at least for now, my body is experiencing constant inflammation, and all I know for certain is that this is not normal.

After having a pity party for myself on the ride home from the doctor’s office, I resolved that I refuse to believe that nothing can be done for my condition, despite being told that diet will have no bearing on my inflammation. I have spent the last two years taking responsibility for my health, and Crohn’s cannot shake that philosophy.

I am currently taking steps to heal my gut through the Gut and Psychology Syndrome Diet, and while I am on an immunosuppressant steroid drug for eight weeks, I am determined to remain drug-free for this condition after this period. I am determined to achieve remission through a total transformation of my diet, and with the help and guidance of other doctors I am pursuing who have experience treating Crohn’s disease along with other autoimmune issues.

In light of this, I urge any and all who suspect that something is just “off” in their body to look seriously into the problem. And when doctors tell you what the problem is, but offer no solution, dig even deeper. Seek out a Functional Medicine Doctor; get to the root of the issue. Most importantly, take charge of your health, whether it’s your hormones, your gut, your mind, or something else. We cannot function properly as a whole when one part of us is out of balance. Keep searching for answers in your quests for true health, too, and do not let a diagnosis shake you – even if it’s Crohn’s.