dieting

Weight Loss Versus Healthy Living

2312 views

If you’ve ever glanced at yourself in a reflection and thought, “I can stand to lose a few pounds,” you are in the company of many people around the world who spend a substantial amount of time and effort to shed the fat. Also, you may share the disappointment of those who lost, but did not maintain the desired weight loss.

In 2014, I faced such a dilemma that resulted in several diagnoses attributed to weight- related chronic metabolic dysfunction. Obesity and metabolic conditions have become so commonplace that rationalizations and public acceptance of taking maintenance prescriptions have become rites of passage in adulthood. Conventional doctors with less than 10 minutes of face-to-face time, offer cryptic instructions to drop the weight and then prescribe the medications advertised on television during the big game or the latest TV drama. Many of us do not question our primary physician’s wisdom and accept the prescription(s) without an exit strategy to correct the decline of health.  As a result, we remain attached to a synthetic substance that exchanges the suppression of one symptom with the initiation of a new one.  How do we begin to right this slippery slope of inevitability?

Is Weight Loss the Solution?

The great minds of health and fitness have spoken!  The cure for weight related diseases is calorie restriction coupled with calorie expenditure – weight loss.  The weight loss industry is a $60-billion-dollar cash cow. Prior to the 1950s, there weren’t any health clubs to be found. In modern day American cities, you cannot drive 10 miles in any direction without running into a health club franchise. Weight loss programs are well represented on television commercials and fat loss over-the-counter supplementation remedies can be found in any drug store chain across the country. Despite the weight-loss landscape of proposed opportunities of success, more than two – thirds (68.8 percent) of adults are considered to be overweight or obese. The estimated annual medical cost of obesity in the US was $147 billion in 2008. Somehow, the cure doesn’t appear to lessen the trend of obesity and the growing numbers of weight related chronic conditions.

Weight Loss Equals Energy Reduction + Energy Expenditure, Or Does It?

The concept of weight loss by conventional wisdom is essentially, Eat Less and Exercise More. As a middle aged overweight American, I spent many days feeling quite hungry while eating the Standard American Diet (SAD) that included the occasional drive thru run for breakfast, lunch and/or dinner. In my daily life, there wasn’t much movement outside of walking from my home to my vehicle to go to work and vice versa. Perhaps, these experts had a point. The problems that can materialize from this approach is the driving purpose of losing weight by all means necessary with a limited understanding of long term health and sustainability. There is also a perception from the layman standpoint that weight loss automatically equates to good health. Most weight loss programs call for reducing a person’s daily caloric intake from 3,000 – 4,000 calories daily to 1,200 – 1,500 calories along with an increase in daily activity.  If it were only that easy, we’d all be thin and healthy.

Very few people find weight loss success with this method and often end up gaining the original weight back and more (keeping the weight loss industry happy). Why would this happen? Adipose tissue (visceral fat) is an endocrine organ that excretes hormones (leptin) to regulate satiety. It also slows metabolism and increases inflammation in the body in order to create homeostasis by extending hunger to gain the fat back to its previous state.

When insulin is high, brown fat begins to mimic white (visceral) fat to halt the thermogenic response of using energy (food) and begin fat storage. Was this approach supposed to be permanent? Did this approach correct the opiate receptors and dopamine response to the sugar and reset taste receptors that are hardwired from natural selection to be predisposed to quick energy in the form of sweets? Does the dietary intake sustain the weight loss if activity wanes because of injury or illness? Were the nutrient deficiencies on the SAD Diet corrected or did the new dietary intake create new deficiencies? Was the hit to hormone production previously corrected and can hunger and satiety be trusted now? Lastly, was this dietary/exercise solution adopted as a lifestyle change or a plug-in to an imbalanced way of living? Typically the answer to these questions is no, and that is why this approach fails. We cannot diet our way out of a lifetime of bad habits – habits that have negatively altered our chemistry. We have to correct the chemistry.

But Wait, Can’t I Just Detox?

The new trendy “ace in the hole” to sustain such an unsustainable “fix it” dietary change is called DETOX.  Fall off the wagon as many times as you like, just plug in a device designed to flush the gut with nutrients to circumvent the pizza binge or sugar attack as a result of derailing.  Detox programs can tend to be vegetable or fruit based or both to reset/replenish the body with all the essentials to get one back on track. Interestingly enough, one has to consider that the dietary change and the detox individually are presented as high in nutrition but cannot be sustained long term individually or collectively to reach and maintain the desired weight. The rub is that the health, fitness and diet industry do not own these failures to meet and exceed customer benchmarks. The fallout and blame is often times put on the “will power” of the individual.

Weight Loss and Management are More than Calories In, Calories Out

Looking into the concept of weight management, the term in of itself provides a connotation of an ongoing process. Weight management incorporates an integrative approach that does not begin and end with what you put into your mouth or the intensity in which you move. There are vital aspects of life that directly and indirectly affect weight such as:

  • sleep quality
  • adherence to circadian rhythms
  • stress/anxiety management (reduction of sympathetic system responses to only acute life or death situations)
  • emotion management
  • physical activity (all throughout the day and not only with a designated workout period)
  • prioritization of personal and professional time
  • spiritual connectivity /connectivity with the world around you
  • financial designations (putting financial matters into perspective with proper balance)
  • personal development (neuroplasticity – creating new neuro pathways built for new knowledge, experience and challenges keeps the brain vibrant and young)
  • nutritional balance (nourishment of the microbiome alleviating gut flora dysbiosis, cultivating cellular health, optimally functioning mitochondria for ATP production/recycling, adherence to common nutrient deficiencies and overall wellness

Ultimately, the long-term solution is a culture/lifestyle change. What does that mean and how does that differ from the current offerings? When times are tough and difficulties in life occur, resorting to the behavior that contributes to poor health is not advantageous. Those who live within a given culture or lifestyle do not simply follow principles or rules, they actually embody the culture and the lifestyle –which is their identity. When times are difficult, there isn’t any other way to live or to revert. Weight management provides the framework to give your life back and offer a long, active life with weight loss as a consequence of clean living. In that regard, clean living and total health should be both the beginning and endpoints of healthy living. Live healthy and embrace body composition over an arbitrary number on a scale.

We Need Your Help

Hormones Matter needs funding now. Our research funding was cut recently and because of our commitment to independent health research and journalism unbiased by commercial interests we allow minimal advertising on the site. That means all funding must come from you, our readers. Don’t let Hormones Matter die.

Yes, I’d like to support Hormones Matter.

This article was published originally in April 2017. 

Get bikini ready fast! Lose weight now! Specially formulated for women!

2933 views

Got your attention, eh?

Summer is nipping at our heels, which brings shudders to many women. No longer can we hide under big sweaters and coats. It’s time to peel off our winter camouflage and get bikini ready! At least this is what we’re led to believe as we’re bombarded by media ads and commercials.

In 2012, Americans spent $20 billion in their weight loss quest, including diet books, diet drugs and weight loss surgeries. At any given time there are approximately 108 million dieters in the U.S., typically making four to five attempts each year. Eighty-five percent are women, so it’s no wonder the weight loss industry has created a niche targeted to women. Typical diet pill concoctions consist of thermogenic fat burners and appetite suppressants. The Bermuda triangle for me is HOW these products have been tailored to specifically work for women. SLIMQUICK® and Pro Clinical HydroxyCut™ Max are two “made for women” products that are easily recognizable on retail shelves, ready to be snatched up by eager consumers.

Key Differences

Men and women are different. We know this. Our physiological differences are apparent. At the root of these key differences are our hormones, dictated by the various glands of our endocrine system. There are more than 20 major hormones that course through our bloodstream to influence almost every cell, organ and function of our bodies. Males and females differ by the types and levels of hormones that run through our respective masculine and feminine veins. By diet pill manufacturers targeting women, we would assume that these magic pills work in conjunction with our cycling hormones.

The Bermuda Triangle of Weight Loss

“The active ingredients in the SLIMQUICK formula are backed by real clinical research that shows that they work to burn fat, reduce appetite and increase energy! In a clinical study, overweight women using a key ingredient in SLIMQUICK along with a 1,350-calorie diet lost an average of three times the weight compared to those who just followed the 1,350-calorie diet! That means you could get three times the weight results by using SLIMQUICK!” is SLIMQUICK’s FAQ explanation to the question “How does SLIMQUICK work?”

The website repeats usage of the term “key ingredients,” yet provides no details of what these key ingredients are. All this may satisfy the consumer hopeful for a quick fix, but for me it explains nothing and only irritates me. I went further to buy a bottle with the hopes of finding a sound scientific explanation within the packaging, but to no avail. There’s a nice mini glossy color package insert that includes a diet plan, but still lacks clinical explanation to their trademark tagline, “Designed for Women™.” A deeper dive on their webpage, Designed for Women, provides yet another ambiguous explanation of how women are genetically programmed to carry extra fat. Compared to men, we have more enzymes for fat storage and less for fat burning. There are six physiological barriers that hinder women with weight loss, but guess what? SLIMQUICK helps overcome these barriers. HOW is still the million dollar question, or should I say in the weight loss industry, the billion dollar question.

From what I can tell, caffeine seems to be the only identifiable key ingredient in SLIMQUICK. Let’s do a simple breakdown. What does caffeine do? It gives us a temporary energy boost and dehydrates us. Caffeine gives us energy to move more and we lose water. Water loss results in weight loss, but that loss is only temporary. SLIMQUICK states that each full serving (3 caplets) contains the caffeine equivalent to approximately two 8-ounce cups of regular brewed coffee. So why not just drink coffee?

Pro Clinical HydroxyCut Max does somewhat of a better explanation, if only by comparison to SLIMQUICK. The genesis of the product came about to meet the weight loss needs of competitive female fitness athletes and figure models; you know, the ones we see in health and fitness magazines in their perfectly toned bikini bodies. The website states the product, “contains an ingredient that delivers fast-acting energizing effects.

Max! Hydroxagen® contains proprietary ingredient blends that complete the formula.” Oh hey, proprietary ingredient blends sounds legit! Are you getting excited? Keep reading. “The Max! ProDefine™ Blend is composed of clinically proven key ingredients that can help you achieve powerful weight loss results.” Wow, clinically proven so it must work! Furthermore, each pill “contains an ingredient (caffeine anhydrous [1,3,7-trimethylxanthine]) that supports increased energy.” Claims include data analysis of the results from two clinical studies on the key ingredients (lady’s mantle extract, wild olive extract, komijn extract, and wild mint extract) shows statistical significance for test subjects having lost 7 times more weight versus placebo subjects. Are you ready to buy now? Not so fast. As always pay attention to the fine print. Footnotes state average weight loss and body mass index (BMI) reduction with key ingredients were achieved and that all groups followed a calorie-reduced diet. Repeat the last part of that last sentence. All groups followed a calorie-reduced diet. There is your scientifically proven formula. Weight loss happens when calorie burn is more than calorie intake.

Reality Check

One ugly truth about an industry that caters to aesthetics is they actually want you to fail. They want to hook you in for a temporary fix, with the hopes of keeping you hooked. Circle back to the 2012 statistics of approximately 108 million dieters in the U.S., typically making four to five attempts annually to lose weight. Each repeated attempt is the fail ratio the weight loss industry counts on to stay successful.

Why am I so passionate about the topic? I was the kid who could eat whatever I wanted and not gain weight. A can of corn with a stick of butter (yes, a whole stick of butter) melted in the microwave was a snack for me. Then one day as an impressionable teen, I was weighed with my dance team. Weight scales were a non-factor for me until then. The scale hit 109 lbs. Somehow my brain blitzed and I didn’t want to be a 3-digit weight girl. I wanted to be only 2-digits! Never mind the fact I stand 5’3” and 109 lbs was a reasonable weight. I needed to be 2-digits, so I put myself on this blind asinine “diet” based on Slim-Fast commercials. I had two shakes a day, yet still ate Burger King Whoppers. In my young utterly clueless mind, I thought this diet shake was the magic bullet to weight loss. Why? Because I believed the commercials. Two shakes for breakfast and lunch, with a sensible dinner. Did I lose weight? Yes. The weight loss also triggered an unhealthy need to keep losing weight for the magic goal of 90 lbs.

Through age and life experiences, we become smarter human beings. We are logical. We know and understand facts, but as humans we are also driven by emotions; lured into quick fix pills and the weight loss industry preys on that. Revenue is based on moving product. SLIMQUICK claims to be the #1 leading weight loss brand for women since 2005. I give them credit for their business savvy. They certainly move a lot of product for not explaining a whole lot. They even offer a free trial if you pay $4.95 only shipping and handling. Hook, line and sinker.

At the end of this article, I still have no idea what is it about the diet pills that make them work for only women, and frankly I don’t care to find out because ultimately they’re not good for our health. Thankfully after cycling through various diet kicks, I have landed on a healthy lifestyle. I stay active and eat well. No food is off limits. If you want it, enjoy it in moderation. Deprivation leads to obsession. Just say no to magic beans that will lead you to no place better than Jack and his beanstalk. We all fluctuate from time to time in our health. When it comes time to “get healthier,” do what you already know.