health insurance

Sick, Deaf, and Uninsured: The Nightmare of American Healthcare

Published on
2291 views
uninsured nightmare of american healthcare

Lifelong Hearing Loss

At the age of nine years old, I was diagnosed with progressive sensorineural hearing loss. At that time, I already had a 60% loss in the high tones. No one knew I was deaf because I had adapted and learned to lipread. I suspect most people I encounter these days don’t realize how deaf I am. I have had hearing examinations where the audiologist thought something was wrong with their equipment because I am so deaf I don’t hear most of the tones. My speech comprehension goes down about 50% when the audiologist covers their face with a piece of paper. I was recently tested and my loss has progressed from the “Moderate to Severe” category to “Severe to Profound”. Without hearing aids the world is a very quiet place.

Unprepared to be Uninsured

For the whole of my adult life, healthcare and insurance were not things I worried about. My first husband was in the military, so on those rare occasions I needed a doctor, I saw whoever was on shift at the base clinic. When I was pregnant with both my children, an Ob/Gyn was assigned to me and then I saw whoever was on shift when it was time to give birth at a military hospital. When I went to work for a city government, I had health insurance and doctors were assigned to me sort of magically. For much of the time I had health insurance, I didn’t even make the deductible. I was completely ill-prepared to join the legions of the uninsured in 2010 when I had to take an early retirement from my civil service job.

Phone Impaired in the Age of Smart Phones

I was last able to use the telephone on a limited basis in 2009. Even though I had a special amplified handset on my work phone, I sometimes would get a call and be unable to understand anything the caller was saying. I had to hand the phone to a co-worker when that happened.

Now that I don’t have an amplified land line, I cannot use the phone at all. What calls get made, my husband has to make or take them for me. He has auditory processing disorder and is likely high functioning autistic as well as ADHD. So phone calls take a lot of energy on his part and I don’t ask him to make them unless it is absolutely necessary.

One of the things I think many people may not be aware of is that many, if not most, healthcare practices do not accept uninsured patients. This is especially true of specialist like GI and endocrinologists. I don’t blame them, I cannot pay medical bills unless they are given to me in a manner that I can plan for and afford while still paying upfront for ongoing health care, medications, and supplements. Not being able to use the telephone to call multiple practices to inquire about their patient acceptance practices and to get cost information upfront makes it nearly impossible for me to get services I need even if I have funds to pay for them.

The High Cost of Not Knowing

After retiring early without health insurance, I managed to get by for three years without any healthcare.  When I started having chronic diarrhea, I looked around online to find help that I could afford. That information was not obtainable without a phone, so I wound up in the local university hospital ER with a blood pressure of 240/130. We owed no one when we walked in the hospital doors and now we had debt more than a small house would have cost. I remember lying in bed in a haze and crying because I felt I would never again own a home of my own.

Ironically, the event that I believe triggered my hypertension was related to an unscheduled “invasion” of our duplex by appraisers. One of the reasons I need a home of my own is that I don’t feel entirely safe in a rented home. It is a subjective thing and I have been at loss to explain it until I started learning about autism.

During the four day hospital stay, I filled out an application for financial assistance, but since I still had money in a retirement savings account, my application was denied. I did not feel I should take the money out of that account because I was saving to buy new hearing aids. The ones I was wearing were over 10 years old.

I considered trying to pay the hospital $20 or $30 dollars a month to preserve my tattered credit rating, but I received about a dozen bills, none I could afford. One was for $47,000 (that was already discounted 60%) from the hospital. Several were for $2,000-to 3,000 and numerous in the hundreds from various entities like labs, catering, and doctors. There were even separate bills for the emergency room. There was no way I could pay all of them even at $10 a month. We were living payday to payday with little remaining. Since I could not pay all of them, I did not pay any of them. I was used to paying my bills on time and so consciously deciding not to pay these bills caused me a lot of distress. I still had undiagnosed and complicated health problems that needed ongoing care. I had no idea how I was going to pay for that.

Hostage to the System

I was referred to a local health clinic and I paid for that out of my income tax refund, which I had decided to park in a savings account to pay each years’ ongoing medical expenses. When I was referred to a rural GI practice, my husband’s mother gave us several thousand dollars to help pay for it. This experience was another nightmare. The rural GI was treating thousands of low-income patients and he had, at most, 15 minutes of time with us. He spent most of that time entering data into a computer. This was a problem for me because I need people to face me in order to be able to lipread. I explained that repeatedly, but he either forgot or ignored my request.

I was having ongoing diarrhea, digestive issues, and malnutrition when I was referred to the GI. I did not feel it was safe to protest or be overly assertive with this doctor, as I desperately needed his services.  His lack of accommodation for my deafness was only part of what made this experience so upsetting. He seemed to have no understanding or concern for our financial issues. Even though we explained our financial situation, he ordered a litany of expensive tests. I could not get anyone at the clinic to tell me how much things would cost upfront. Even his office visits were a problem. I asked about cost and explained I was uninsured at the time of the first office visit. I paid the $179 they requested up front, but then they would send me additional bills for $79 with no explanation. The total of all the tests including endoscopy and colonoscopy, CT scan, etc. was somewhere around $8,000-9,000. I think we paid 4 or 5 thousand up front from money my mother-in-law gave us. Again I didn’t get one billing entity, but a 1/2 dozen or so different bills. So that was yet another hit to my already miserable credit rating.

I continued to suffer digestive issues even on the prescription enzymes and PPI.  Since the doctor declined to address several of my health concerns that he didn’t feel were GI related, I was disinclined to go see him again. It was only when we finally got two incomes that we were able to afford an allergist. I was diagnosed with 44 food allergies as well as multiple environmental ones.  The allergies were the cause of the  digestive problems that the GI refused to evaluate. That was another three years of my life needlessly lost to digestion related malnutrition.

New Type of Primary Care

I recently changed from the local corporate clinic to a new type of family practice two hours away. The family practice seemed like a good deal as they had lower costs for lab work and a monthly fee with $20 an office visit charge. They also had a patient portal which seemed ideal for me since I could write about my problems instead of trying to relay them via my husband over the phone. After two visits at $180 a piece, I had problems because they didn’t seem to want to hear about any of the problems other than the type 2 diabetes. When I managed to get them to understand the full range of my health problems, they unceremoniously dumped me via email. They referred me to a nutritionist who strung me along two weeks before declining to take me as a patient because I could not do consultations on the cell phone.

This dumping echoed a lot of childhood experiences of rejection so it was traumatic enough that it made me cry. It has been increasingly hard for me to put my trust in healthcare professionals since the death of my second husband to colon cancer. They were not the cause of his death but there was a lot of needless suffering along the way. This opened my eyes to problems in our healthcare system I was previously unaware of.

Fairly frequently in the past eight years, I have felt a sort of despair that is like being trapped in an emergency situation with no way to call out for help. Some of this stems from a lifetime trauma coping strategy of submission and some of it is due to poor communications skills on my part. I can never know how well I will be able to articulate the thoughts in my head. They seem so clear to me but somehow come out confused and garbled when I am stressed. I have to do a lot of meditation and exercise to calm down HPA activations just prior to a healthcare visits. I arrive at my appointments with as much written down as I can manage because stress causes me to lose even more communications abilities.

Direct Primary Care

I finally had a bit of luck when I found a Doctor of Internal Medicine who has a Direct Primary Care practice. I had almost disabling anxiety in the weeks up to my first visit because I was afraid if I told her too much about my problems she might refuse to take me as a patient. Fortunately, she was honest, blunt, and straightforward in a way that alleviated my anxiety. I focused on my official diagnosis and getting medications refilled on our first visit. On the second visit, I wanted to focus on the undiagnosed problems. Thanks to Chandler Marrs for editing and publishing my story here on Hormones Matter, I feel I have been heard and understood. As a result, I now have referrals to an endocrinologist, a GI, and a contact to get evaluated for High Functioning Autism (HFA).

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

Share Your Story

If you have a complicated health story to share, send us a note. 

 

Related posts:

American healthcareThe Appalling State of American Health DES pregnancyDES, Nazis, and American Industrialists

You might be interested in

Insurance Liability and Medical Adverse Events

Published on
2450 views
medical adverse events lawsuits

In reading a blog the other day, I was reminded how little many people understand about their health insurance (or any insurance), particularly how personal insurance works when injuries or damages are caused by a person or company with legal responsibility for those injuries or damages. Insurance is a subject that for most of us, causes great pain and consternation; we don’t get it, our eyes roll back in our heads and our brains go into explode mode if we have to read an insurance contract. More often than not, we just rely on the agent or claims person to explain to us. (I understand that- because that is how I felt before I actually went to work in the insurance industry.)

Who Pays What and When

Most of us think that if we get sick or injured, we go to the doctor or hospital, pay our co-pay or deductible, and are good to go. For your average illness, or accidental injury, that is the case. However, in certain circumstances, this does not hold true. For example, if you are injured as a result of your job, you may be covered under Workman’s Compensation, and your health insurance is not responsible for your medical care and bills. Or, if you are in an auto accident and if you did not cause the accident, then the auto insurance of the person who caused it is responsible for your medical expenses. Your health insurance is only responsible for any cost above the amount of the limits that driver’s insurance policy, and/or any amount that is paid under your own uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage on your own auto policy, if you have one.

Medical Adverse Events or Injury Claims

In the case of injury/damage from a medical device or a negligent physician, your personal health insurance is not responsible for the cost of your medical care that results from that damage. And that is the issue I’d like to discuss today- the medical/negligence issues. If you suffer from injuries that are the result of a faulty device, a reaction to a medication, a negligent doctor, etc., your insurance company will generally initially cover your bills, but if you go to court, and it is determined that another person or manufacturer are actually at fault in causing your injuries, and therefore legally responsible for what happened to you, then your health insurance policy is not responsible for any of your care that is a result.

So, how does it work?  In most cases, the actual cause of the injury/damage is not known at the time you begin to seek medical treatment, and your insurance is covering those expenses. But once it has been determined in court that there is a party that is legally responsible for the injuries, then your health insurance company is not held responsible. Even though they did pay at first, the party that has been found responsible, whether a company or an individual, is now responsible for all of the medical costs associated with the cause of the injury/damage. As a result, the insurance company must be reimbursed for the payments they made on your behalf.

This is covered under the law by what is called “Double Indemnity”. This means that one cannot be recompensed twice for the same loss.  So, for example, in a car accident, if you are not at fault, you can’t get payment of the cost to replace your car from both your insurance company and the insurance company of the other party. You can’t have the same medical bill paid by both your insurance and the other party’s insurance.   You can’t purchase 2 insurance policies to cover the same item, or risk (such as health insurance). And in the case of product liability or negligence, you cannot be paid twice for the cost of your medical care. When settlement is paid, it includes the cost of the medical care.  If you were the one who originally paid the full amount for the medical care, you keep the money.

If your insurance company paid for the medical care. You must pay them back.

Now in settling these cases, there may be multiple types of payment ordered to the injured party, which can include medical expenses, lost wages, cost of any home health or general care required as a result of the injury, and there can also be additional payments for pain and suffering, loss of companionship suffered by one’s spouse, loss of care to one’s children, etc. On top of that, depending on the individual case, there may be punitive damages that the party responsible must pay. (This is most frequent in a case against a corporation found to have been willfully negligent).

Usually, you will receive a check from the company/individual for the full amount of the settlement, and you are then responsible for reimbursing the insurance company from the settlement amount you received. In a few cases, the court may direct the responsible party to make payment directly to the insurance company for the portion of the award that covers those expenses, with the rest to the injured party, but most often, the injured party receives the entire sum and must reimburse the insurance companies themselves. Here is where it sometimes gets confusing for the injured party.

Class Actions are Different

Now, a caveat is in order here. The above describes what will generally happen in the case of an individual personal lawsuit. Levels of responsibility and damages awarded will vary in individual cases, but will generally address the actual expenses of the individual plaintiff, and settlements are awarded on that basis. There is, however, another type of case that many victims of medical malfeasance may become involved in, and that is the “Class Action Lawsuit”. Unfortunately, in a class action lawsuit, the amount of the award that goes to any individual plaintiff may not cover all of the individual’s medical expenses. In a class action suit, each individual agrees to accept a specific percentage of the aggregate award, after attorney’s fees are deducted from the award, regardless of their individual expenses.

An individual plaintiff’s award may not be enough to cover either real expenses or pain and suffering, yet due to the finding of liability on the part of the third party, the plaintiff may still be held responsible for reimbursement of the insurance company.

This is actually a subject for a more in-depth article in the future, but in the mean time, you should know that participating in class action suit may not yield a financial award sufficient to cover your medical expenses.

How Insurance Rates Are Determined

I would just like to add a note regarding the determination of the cost of individual health insurance policies and how rates are determined. (This actually applies to all catastrophic insurance policies as well, including auto and homeowner liability). Rates are set based on projections of how much an insurance company can be expected to pay for casualty losses of  ALL their customers in a given time frame, and for losses that are not the result of negligence or intent by a third party. This is because of the liability laws that can hold a third party financially responsible for damage to another that is the result of negligence or malice. If the insurance companies were required to pay for losses to their customers that were caused by a third party, either intentionally or due to negligence, then rates would have to be factored to include those costs as well, and costs would skyrocket to the customer.

What This Means For You and Yours

The cause of illness or injury may not always be clear when it first occurs. And of course, the initial action taken should be to consult your physician, or in the case of emergency get to a hospital. Your personal health insurance will generally be the first source of payment. Should it turn out to be the potential liability of a third party, whether a person or a company, when consulting an attorney regarding a lawsuit, it is important to discuss with them the specific details regarding what sort of judgment is expected. Some basic questions to consider may include the following:  Can you expect that all of your actual expenses (medical losses, loss of wages, any home health or household assistance, loss of future income if one is long-term or permanently disabled, etc.) will be covered? Can you ask for punitive damages? How will attorney fees and other legal fees be charged (Can the defendant be expected to pay, or will they deducted from your award)? This can help prevent surprises, and unexpected costs once the case is settled.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

Image by LEANDRO AGUILAR from Pixabay.

Related posts:

hair loss, mitochondria and thyroidThyroid Hormones, Mitochondrial Functioning, and Hair Loss tangled ribbons poverty mammographyTangled Ribbons, Tangled Lives what the heck is oxalateWhat the Heck Are Oxalates and Why Should I Care? frack waterWater Contamination Near Fracking Sites: Dangerous Endocrine Disruptors

You might be interested in

The Match Game of Healthcare That Works: Understanding Insurance

Published on
2273 views
health insurance

Understand What Insurance Is and Is Not

Finding healthcare resources – people, treatments, care – is a match game. Your quest is to find resources to partner with you to feel better, heal and experience the life you want to live.

Reading “match game,” the vision that probably came to mind involves perusing a list of “providers” your insurance company included in a thick volume of paperwork. Or maybe you wish you at least had an opportunity to have access to such a list. You see lists organized by “specialty” (which you may or may not understand) and geography; and you hope you can find someone with solutions for your needs – someone to help you feel better – from this paltry information.

The Traditional Match Game: The Insurance Company Sets the Playing Field For “Health”

Health insurance is not healthcare. Insurance is business. Health insurance is a payment system.

In the framework of the traditional match game, the insurance company sets the rules with four basic things: 1) a list of “providers” – people who meet the company’s contractual requirements; 2) a list of acceptable services (your “benefits”) the providers can offer for certain ailments; 3) acceptable fees for such services; and finally 4) a means to parse the payment/cost burden. This is so familiar that perhaps we didn’t even question this until prices sky rocketed and services diminished.

Playing the well-being match game within this familiar framework puts the insurance corporation in a position of power. Playing the match game this way immediately puts a corporation, a payment system, in control of your well-being. Through their contractual relationships they determine what constitutes health, who is allowed to serve your needs, and what treatments or medications are acceptable. Insurance companies narrow the field of possibilities and choices for your path to well-being.

By engaging in this match game we’ve been attempting to attain well-being from a system in which the rules have been set by companies that are focused on payment and profit. Pause and think about that for a moment. We have been lulled into looking to a payment system as a means to experience vitality.

You may have had very good success with this structure. While this may work well for some, and may work some times; for many it is a challenge to find care that works. That challenge can take a further toll on health.

In this traditional match game it is very difficult to insert your personal needs, values, and beliefs about health and well-being into the framework of a payment system. It can be a challenge to find the right partner in healing, the right practitioner, who supports your personal journey to live your best life.

Time To Shift the Paradigm

If it doesn’t work for many, if not most, people to look to a payment system as a means to experience well-being, what do we do? It requires a change in the fundamental nature of the match game. In the next article we’ll explore this shift. It begins with identifying your personal concept of the essence of health, well-being and healing. This will vary for each person, and can vary over time. This shift puts each person back into control of their health.

About the author: Deb is co-owner of Experience In Motion, which equips organizations with tools to curate meaningful experiences for customers and employees. Deb’s personal journey from decay to well-being inspired an emphasis in improving healthcare experiences for patients and practitioners by focusing on experiences that heal and self-caring as a way of organizational being. www.experienceinmotion.net.

Note: This is part of an ongoing series to equip you with a process, a path, to identify and experience healthcare that works for you. Other articles in this series are:

The heart of healthcare that works: know your personal worldview of health   

Find your Inner Chris Columbus

Related posts:

protein orexin hypocretin brainThe Brain Needs Protein, Say What? refeeding syndromeRefeeding Syndrome health, healing and illnessThe Exquisite Simplicity of Health and Illness: Mitochondria and Energy women deserve betterDeconstructing Modern Illness: Idiopathic or Iatrogenic?

You might be interested in

Health at the Nexus of Economics and Innovation

Published on
1877 views

Health innovation exists largely because of the promise of great profits. Whether it is new drugs, devices or even health insurance, the development of these products are firmly established capitalist endeavors. Health itself, however, like life, liberty or even the pursuit happiness exists on a different plane entirely, more closely aligning with the right of life than with a corollary product or commodity. Where it gets squishy is in determining who is responsible for paying for that right, especially when someone chooses to ignore the responsibility of good health, is genetically burdened with ill-health, faces poverty, or as is the case in modern industrial society, is sold ill-health by companies whose very existence depends upon products that cause illness.

Where do one’s right of life and presumably some quality of life or health end and the right to profits begin? Who shall pay for these rights? And are there innovation opportunities in defining or re-defining health as a right versus a product or a commodity?

Understanding Moral Hazard and Modern Health Care

In 2009, with the financial system in ruins, the phrase moral hazard burst into the daily lexicon. One could not listen to a news report without hearing how those responsible for the crisis pushed all of the risks of their highly profitable ventures on to everyone else – textbook moral hazard. And then, to make matters worse, we were being asked to bail out these giant institutions that crumbled our economy, while they continued to reap huge salaries and bonuses. The gall…

Many view health insurance and by association, healthcare, as an industry based upon moral hazard. Unlike the moral hazard of the current financial markets, however, where the chosen few distribute risk downward to the many, the moral hazard in health care presumes that the many distribute the risk back up to the few, those presumably responsible individuals, who are healthy. Indeed, the distribution of risk penalizes good health with the increased cost of bad health borne by all. “How dare we be asked to pay for our neighbor’s smoking or obesity?” The gall…

What is often missed in our moral outrage, is how being sick reduces the profitability for those at the top of the insurance industry. This is the crux of modern health care’s fatal flaw – a skewed version of moral hazard where health care is a commodity that few at the top of the food chain are willing to risk on those at the bottom.

Health Economics

Modern theories of health economics argue that the act of providing health care services to all and the distribution of those costs amongst everyone will reduce the total financial risks but also increase the need for care, and therefore reduce profits. The presumption is that when people are given low-cost health care will, they will choose to partake in more health care services in much the same way that lower prices encourage other product purchases.

Appendectomy anyone?

Despite the almost comical notion that people enjoy going to the doctor’s office and/or to the hospital in the same way they enjoy purchasing a new handbag, or that these services are like any other commodity driven purely by access and cost, this concept of moral hazard pervades the health care/insurance debate, with nary a question of its legitimacy or utility. What is more, this model likely reduces overall profitability of the industries that seek to reap the rewards from health while increasing the profits of those who benefit from illness or at least benefit from ignoring the illnesses their products cause.

Health Innovation

If health innovation (the products within the health care system, new drugs, devices, programs, vitamins etc.) are only developed on the promise of great profits, how does that square with the notion that individuals really don’t want to go to the doctors unless they have to? How do we reconcile the need for health innovation to maintain our economic and health vitality and the premise that health care isn’t a product in the traditional sense; that it isn’t needed or wanted until it is needed?

Marketing Health (or Illness)

The current healthcare business model answers that question with marketing. Make the consumer or the physician want or believe they need the products being sold. The pharmaceutical industry is quite successful marketing must-have medications and products and they do so by employing the same tactics and strategies used to market any other consumer product.

Indeed, the newer model products/drugs are akin to the designer versions of a handbag and yield the same ‘must-have’ response from the consumer (even the physician) who is willing to pay premium prices for the latest and greatest medication. Like the must-have handbags, newer drugs often have no more efficacy than older ones (sometimes are worse), often contain only single isomer changes  (meaning molecularly they are almost entirely the same drug as the earlier, cheaper version e.g. Lexapro and Celexa) and more often rest the perceived utility solely on re-branding. A brilliant model if it wasn’t health or life and death that was for sale.

Another Way

What would happen if health was re-conceptualized as a right? If it were considered a right, then there would be a duty to protect it, legally. The current practice approving drugs and devices would look very different than it is today. From a market standpoint, the backlash from those who profit from illness would be swift and intense, but the potential for innovation and profits from other sectors could be equally strong, if the opportunity is recognized.

As it stands, we have big pharma, big agriculture (pesticide and herbicide use), big coal, big tobacco and other industries profiting wildly from their products, while distributing the health and economic risks downward to the masses in the classic model of moral hazard. These industries bear little to no responsibility for the true health costs of their products. Those risks are dispersed over time and over millions of people.

On the other side, we have the health care industry, straddled with the burden of caring for an ever less healthy populous while simultaneously having to answer to shareholders demand for profits. Their model of moral hazard proscribes increased profits for the top, increased cost for the healthy, and reduced services for everyone else. The health care industry pushes back on the individual, dis-enrolling, reducing access, but pays little attention to the purveyors of bad health. They buy hook-line-and-sinker the notion that the individual is solely responsible for his/her health. And while that is true in many cases, in today’s cesspool of environmental carcinogens, dangerous and eventually recalled (although not before the damage is done), pharmaceuticals and devices, endocrine disruptors, and generally unhealthy food supply, no individual alone can avoid all contact with the garbage that is in our environment and ultimately causes illness. And they shouldn’t have to. If the industries that currently lose money from illness (insurance, hospitals, employers), would step in and push back against those that profit from illness, we would see a radical change in disease rates, an enormous reduction in health care costs and an incredible increase in innovation.

If health were a right akin to the right of life, then products that affect health would be judged not just on the perceived profit margin, but on the actual cost/benefit ratio to health. The economics of health would switch from how do we distribute the cost of ill-health among the masses to how do we reduce ill-health of the masses. If a product causes more ill health and costs more than it benefits, perhaps it shouldn’t be on the market. Right now the debate is over how not to break the bank by including sick people on the insurance rolls or providing access to care for the poor, perhaps the math would work better if we looked how to prevent illness in the first place.

Related posts:

health, healing and illnessThe Exquisite Simplicity of Health and Illness: Mitochondria and Energy

You might be interested in

Health Plan Providers Least Likely to Be Forgiven

Published on
1446 views

The healthcare industry is one of a number of industries that seems to be losing its connection to the people – their customers. This notion was highlighted by the Temkin Group, a research firm that collects and analyzes data about customer experiences, when they released their 2012 Forgiveness Ratings: Turns out, people aren’t very forgiving of their health plan providers.

Health Plan Providers Low on the Totem Pole

In fact, when the industries were ranked in order of most likely to be forgiven, the health plan industry ranked 14 out of 18. The industry ranked the lowest when rated for overall customer experience. In addition, health plan providers were less likely to be forgiven than banks, and given the state of the economy, that’s pretty bad.

When customers were asked how likely they were to forgive a certain industry, they rated the company on a scale of 1 to 7, with 7 being the most forgiving rating. Though there may be flaws in the data, with only 10,000 customers surveyed to rank 206 companies from 18 industries, the results still give us something to talk about.

Women Make Up Half of Health Plan Customers

While the data isn’t solely focused on women’s customer experiences, it’s important to recognize that we are half of the population. The ratings bring to mind reports that women are less satisfied with their health care than men, which will dampen a company’s chances of being forgiven.

A woman’s dissatisfaction with her health care may be due a number of reasons, including:

Men Also Impacted by Women’s Health

When women are not provided adequate and affordable health care, our spouses, partners, and families suffer, too. Including pregnancy as a pre-existing condition is an example of how insufficient health plans can impact men. When a woman is denied insurance because she is pregnant, her husband or partner will have to endure the financial blow as well.

In addition, the Committee on Energy and Commerce found that individual insurers deny expectant fathers insurance coverage, demonstrating how attitudes towards women’s health can impact a man’s health and the well-being of an entire family.

Health Plan Providers Least Likely to Be Forgiven

Four health plan providers are in the 20 least forgiven companies: United Healthcare, Anthem (BCBS), Humana, and Cigna. It should come as no surprise that hospital executives and leaders seem to agree with customer opinions.

Revive Public Relations, which specializes in health care and healthy living, began surveying hospital leaders for opinions on health plan providers. Though Cigna came in 2nd place in 2010 (disapproval still resulted in a 65% rating), United Healthcare and Anthem were poorly rated by hospital executives in 2011. Negative opinions of the health plan industry increased overall in 2011, because hospital executives struggled to obtain reimbursements.

Of course, these surveys may not reflect your own opinions. Are you satisfied with your health plan provider? Do you feel that the health plan industry provides adequate care for your needs as a woman? Share your thoughts.

Further Reading:
Women Pay More for Health Insurance than Men
Women Less Satisfied with Health care

Related posts:

reframing maternal healthReframing Maternal Health: How Do We Know What We Think We Know? Depo health stormThe Depo Health Storm

You might be interested in

tangled ribbons poverty mammography

Tangled Ribbons, Tangled Lives

Awareness ribbons looped on lapels. Around trees. Through chain-link fences. Yellow for missing children and bone cancer. Red for heart

Rights Versus Mandates: The Health Insurance Debate

Published on
2125 views

I’m 30 years old, I eat right, exercise, get lots of sunshine and minimize the known carcinogens I put in and on my body, but an accident can happen to anyone, right? Last September, I was laid off and COBRA insurance would have cost me $1200 per month to continue coverage, so I decided to take a risk. Bad things happen to good people, but I simply cannot afford to continue coverage at that rate while on unemployment (or working full time for that matter). Those who know I am a veteran might remark, “Oh but you have the VA for insurance.” Yes, I am enrolled in the VA’s health care system, but it is NOT insurance. I have access to health care at the VA on a sliding scale rate based on my income, but this is not “free insurance” as so many civilians have tried to argue with me. If I am treated at a non-VA facility or have to take a joyride in an ambulance, which will take you to the nearest public hospital, I am 100% responsible for that bill. So, no, I don’t have health insurance and the health care I am eligible for at the VA I earned. I’ve never applied for insurance outside of what my employer provided, but I have a pre-existing condition. I’m an unemployed, uninsured statistic, but I refuse to put my individual wants over the laws of the Constitution, the rights of the States and the individuals.

According to Reason Magazine, the individual health insurance mandate is a clear violation of the American contract law because, “American contract law rests on the principle of mutual assent. If I hold a gun to your head and force you to sign a contract, no court of law will honor that document since I coerced you into signing it. Mutual assent must be present in order for a contract to be valid and binding.” Under the Individual Mandate the government will be unlawfully forcing individuals into a contract with private companies.

Where will it stop? On March 27, the second day of the Supreme Court hearing, Chief Justice Roberts asked if the Federal Government was going to force people to own cell phones so they could contact emergency services; a clear example of the slippery slope we are sliding down. If this passes, I would like to propose that we have Home Invasion Insurance and force every American to own a gun, like is required in Switzerland. If everyone owned a gun, who’s going to break into homes? Statistically, the more guns the public owns, the lower the crime rate and Switzerland has the lowest violent crime rates in the world. So, if all of my neighbors own a shotgun, I’m far less likely to fall victim of home invasion and, therefore, have Home Invasion Insurance.

Furthermore, justification for the individual mandate of the Affordable Health Care Act is that it falls under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 states:

[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes.

This clause authorizes Congress to, “regulate commerce in order to ensure that the flow of interstate commerce is free from local restraints imposed by various states. When Congress deems an aspect of interstate commerce to be in need of supervision, it will enact legislation that must have some real and rational relation to the subject of regulation.” (The Free Legal Dictionary). This clause does not give Congress free reign to regulate any inter/intrastate commerce solely because commerce has taken place. This clause was actually written to protect the States and promote free markets. It is kept in check by the Tenth Amendment, or rather should be. The Tenth Amendment states:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.

And down we slide! In the past year, numerous sting operations have been conducted on Amish farmers selling raw milk to buyers who are fully aware that the product is unpasteurized. In one specific incident, the investigation lasted a year until the milk seller crossed state lines and a SWAT team could arrest him under guise of the Commerce Clause. Yet, does this fall under the Commerce Clause? It shouldn’t – it does not impede the milk companies in the states where the Amish farmers went to sell their villainous raw milk. In response, Congressman, and Presidential candidate, Dr. Ron Paul introduced the bill, HR 1830, to allow the shipment and distribution of unpasteurized milk and milk products for human consumption across state lines. Will we soon have to pass individual laws for every aspect of interstate commerce?

It is no longer even restricted to interstate commerce. “In the 1942 case of Wickard v. Filburn, the Court held that the Commerce Clause allowed Congress to forbid an Ohio farmer named Roscoe Filburn from growing twice the amount of wheat permitted by the Agricultural Adjustment Act and then consuming that extra wheat on his own farm. In 2005, the Court reinforced this decision, holding in Gonzales v. Raich that medical marijuana cultivated and consumed entirely within the state of California still counted as commerce “among the several States” and was therefore open to federal regulation” (Reason Magazine). Again, I ask, where will it stop? Will we have to have another Civil War to defend the State’s Constitutional rights? If so, sign me up.

If this passes the Supreme Court, which is there, not to judge its necessity, but rather its lawfulness, I will be punished. I can’t afford insurance so I’ll be penalized with yet another tax. Last year, my income was taxed 25% for Federal Income Tax, 9.3% by California State Income Tax and on top of that I had to pay 7.75% Sales Tax, the hidden tax. That adds up to 42% of my income! Now, I’m going to be penalized for not purchasing a product I don’t want from a private company? That doesn’t sound like America to me.

And will it even lower health care costs to the individual? NO! I am not an economist, so I will simply refer you to these sites for more information: Charity, Health Care and the Free Market, Find it Hard to Defend Free-Market Medicine. If you can expand more on how this legislation will impede the free market and raise the cost of health care rather than lower it, please join the conversation below.

Our founding fathers wrote great liberties into our constitution, but with these great liberties comes even greater responsibility; the responsibility to fight for those freedoms at all costs. Americans are ready to throw away State rights and individual liberties in order to have health insurance mandated and provided for everyone. However, the Bill of Rights doesn’t include health care, nor should it be up to the government to provide this service. Is the health care system broken? Yes. Do we need the Federal Government to fix it by force, taking away the fundamental rights and choices of individuals, States, private companies, doctors, etc., and thus creating more and more laws, regulations and taxes until we no longer have any freedoms or income? That, my fellow citizens, is up to us and whether we stand up and fight for our rights as bestowed upon us by the Constitution.

Related posts:

No related posts.

You might be interested in

Healthy Behavior No Longer A Personal Choice

Published on
1859 views

It’s a strange state of affairs when the comedy channels break more important stories than the news shows. Just last week a report by Wyatt Cenac, from the John Stewart show set off a firestorm of discussion on the blogosphere.  HR 3472, a bill proposed by former Congresswoman Kathy Dahlkemper, would have offered incentives (insurance discounts) for healthy behavior (not smoking, losing weight, controlling cholesterol) was defeated in committee not by partisan politics (both parties were in favor of the bill) but by intense lobbying efforts from the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Cancer Society (ACS).

Why would the big three associations, which are supposedly for health and prevention, oppose legislation that rewards improved health? According their perfectly jumbled released statements:

ADA
“The impact of these provisions would have been to penalize people with pre-existing health conditions and certain health risks who could not meet these targets by charging them more for their health care. In addition, the legislation would have applied to health plans sold in the individual market, where people do not have the support of a formal workplace wellness program to help them achieve these goals.”

AHA
“This bill might open the door for discrimination of people with pre-existing conditions, and also those who are genetically predisposed to these conditions. Most importantly it would restrict access to healthcare to those who need it most and research has shown that this has a negative effect on health.”

ACS
“In fact, the bill would have enabled employers to reduce the health care premiums of people who met specific health targets (such as not smoking or maintaining low blood pressure), but also penalize people with pre-existing conditions who could not meet the targets by charging them more for their health coverage.  The Society supports comprehensive wellness and health promotion programs that utilize incentives, such as discounted gym memberships, for employees. But we oppose restricting access to health care for those who need it most.”

If their stated opposition is understood correctly, it boils down to, unless everyone benefits from these discounts, no one can benefit. Aside from the absurdity of this argument for the essentially capitalist endeavor that is our insurance industry, in what strange twist of reality did smoking and eating junk food cease to become choices?   And how does offering incentives for eliminating said activities, equate with penalizing those who choose not to partake? Even those with genetic predispositions to high blood pressure, high cholesterol or diabetes would benefit from not smoking, from eating healthier and exercising more.  What do you think?

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
How a Bill Doesn’t Become a Law
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

 

Related posts:

are vegan diets heart healthyAre Vegan Diets Heart Healthy: A Case Study

You might be interested in

Underinsured, Underdiagnosed and Anonymous: Endometriosis

Published on
2254 views

Endometriosis

I am continuing to write this anonymously because I continue to fear the social repercussions and potential backlash of publicly revealing my real name in association with my endometriosis and other health issues. I am uninsured and told by many, uninsurable.

We left off from Part 1 of my story with a tentative diagnosis of endometriosis, a ruptured ovarian cyst, and ever-increasing doses of oral contraceptives. At that point in my life, I was scared, in pain and worried that I and the doctors should be doing more.

But, as it turned out, there was not much more that I could do. The doctors said that even if it wasn’t endometriosis, the pill would probably still be the least invasive and least risky treatment option available to me. They told me this without any intention of scheduling further abdominal inspections, pelvic imaging, endometrial biopsies, or blood draws for biochemical markers, despite my pleas for each. Then again, they had confirmed my endo’ diagnosis without a laparoscope, or CA-125 antigen test, as it was. So, what else should I really have expected from them now? Life on oral contraceptives continued because, apparently, my only other choice was living without a uterus (and risking paralysis due to prior cervical vertebrae injury) at only twenty-five years of age.

I had never had long, frequent, heavy, or uncomfortable periods, much less menstrual cramps, as a young teenager. But, as a woman on COCPs in her mid-twenties, I was experiencing altogether nonexistent cycles, regular breast discharge, ceaseless bloating, and unrelenting gastrointestinal pain and pressure (on top of chronic neck and back pain from the past car accident). One silver lining to my proverbial cloud was that I had finally regained most of the neck control and movement previously lost in the collision. Another consolation to this difficult situation was that I had also saved up enough money, working through physical therapy, to return to school. And, maybe best of all, I had found (without trying) a steady, supportive, and understanding boyfriend, who was not only my match in every way, but who always stayed by my side, through the ups and downs alike. Little did we know the coming financial and health woes to befall us, yet again, over the next few years.

Fast forward about three more years into the future—I had transferred to the university as a junior during the Fall term. My boyfriend and I had been together, going on strong, for four years. And, I had been working part-time at a job that I loved for nearly two years. The future again seemed bright. Healthcare access, however, remained bleak.

The COBRA benefits from my old employer had long expired, not that I could have afforded them at $600 per month anyways. I didn’t qualify for health insurance at my new workplace because I wasn’t full-time there, owing to a loaded class schedule on-campus. And, the only medical coverage that I had been able to afford since leaving the other company was a short-lived, hybrid POS-HMO plan, which I ended up having to cancel early as nobody in my area would accept it (there went another few hundred dollars, I couldn’t afford to lose, down the drain). We had been working around the system, paying out-of-pocket for generic prescriptions, and general lab procedures, at local understaffed health clinics, since no one else seemed willing to work with us. This got us by (it had to) until an unexpected slip-and-fall accident that December rendered a hidden colon tumor palpable in my lower body (something we wouldn’t learn for another four months or so).

The ER wouldn’t treat me, and only served in referring me to a GI/Endoscopy specialist, who in turn refused to see me because I didn’t have insurance. A major medical carrier subsequently denied me coverage as uninsurable due to pre-existing conditions (namely my C2 fracture from nine years earlier, and my endometriosis diagnosis from four years prior), essentially blacklisting me among all other healthcare providers. I couldn’t even qualify for government assistance of any kind. I had come close to dying in just a few short months without knowing what was wrong with me, and we were running out of time and options fast. That’s when my boyfriend popped the question, to get me on his insurance, and to save my life…

To Be Continued.

Related posts:

birth control side effectsHormonal Birth Control Solves Everything Right? Wrong.

You might be interested in

1 2