heavy bleeding

Endometriosis and Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Two Sides of the Same Molecular Coin

11730 views

For as long as I have been studying endometriosis, I have suspected that endometriosis represented a protective cascade, one that has either gone awry or was incapable of fully eliminating or adapting to an internal stressor. To me, endometriosis behaves like cancer, not the cancer of aberrant oncogenes and tumor suppressors, though they are factors, but the cancer of metabolism, of Otto Warburg and others. I think aberrant metabolism is the key to understanding endometriosis and a myriad of other disease processes, including heavy menstrual bleeding. Until recently, however, I have not had much evidence to support this hypothesis. There is a troubling paucity of research on topics related to women’s health. Of the research that exists, much of it is focused on tried and mostly untrue conventional interpretations disease. Interpretations, I would argue, that do more to serve economic or political purposes than health, but I digress.

Over the last few years, however, mitochondrial metabolism has emerged as key determinant of health or disease. Central to this work is the role of cellular hypoxia. In order for cells to function, in order for our brains to think, our hearts to pump, muscles to contract, the mitochondria, organelles within the cells, must breathe. That is, they must consume oxygen and respire. Mitochondrial oxygen consumption results in the critically important production of ATP – cellular energy. Without oxygen, no ATP. Without ATP, nothing works. Cells die. Tissues die. Organs fail. Whether and how quickly injury or death ensues is determined by a number of factors, including the totality of the oxygen deprivation, but also, the metabolic flexibility to withstand insufficient oxygenation, even at low levels. Mitochondrial metabolism can be derailed quite easily by dietpharmaceutical and environmental chemicals, and even a sedentary lifestyle. Metabolic alterations may transpire across generations when exposures are coincident with critical periods of fetal development and even result in de novo or first generation mutations in either nDNA or mtDNA. Mitochondrial metabolism is a key determinant of health and may in fact determine whether and how oxygenation is maintained at the cellular level.

Hypoxia and the HIF Survival Cascades

Adequate oxygenation in the cell involves a system of molecular adaptations that kick into gear during periods of hypoxia and remit when oxygenation returns. These survival cascades are initiated by oxygen sensors that trigger a set of proteins called hypoxia inducible factors (HIF1α and its counterparts HIF1β, HIF2α, HIF3α). HIFs are the master regulators of oxygen homeostasis, ensuring cell survival during periods of low oxygen. So far, researchers have identified at least 100 other proteins controlled by HIFs and tasked with bringing more oxygen and fuel into the cells. HIFs activate angiogenesis (formation of new blood vessels), erythropoiesis (production of new blood cells) and iron metabolism (oxygen carriers), glucose metabolism (substrate for ATP), growth factors, and other proteins. When all else fails, the HIF system signals apoptosis, cell death. In the short term, the hypoxia cascades are brilliant in their ability to forestall anoxia and death. In the long term, however, they wreak havoc.

If you have followed the endometriosis research, most if not all of the proteins involved in maintaining and spreading endometriotic lesions are controlled by HIF proteins. I suspect they were activated by disturbed mitochondrial metabolism, either causatively or consequently. Owing to the laws of reciprocity, once hypoxia sets in, it will disturb mitochondrial metabolism further, initiating a downward spiral that becomes difficult to unwind without full consideration of mitochondrial function. Of interest, these same cascades are active in preeclampsia and other diseases of modernity. In fact, I think many of the diseases we see in western cultures, are a result of long-term, low-level, cellular hypoxia mediated by mitochondrial dysfunction.

What precipitates the hypoxia and the mitochondrial dysfunction is not clear, but here again, I have some ideas. With endometriosis I suspect there are multiple factors that coalesce to generate cell level hypoxia.  Fetal and germ cell damage of our grandmothers and mothers mitigated by environmental (hereherehere) and/or pharmaceutical toxicants combined with our own exposures are key among them. For the heavy menstrual bleeding, however, I think the origins are almost entirely environmental, and by environmental, I mean the totality of the modern environment that includes diet, pharmaceuticals, and the ever-present industrial and environmental chemicals that pervade our existence.

With endometriosis, the hypoxia cascades are hyperactive. That is, HIF proteins are more prominent and seem not to be degraded effectively, suggesting a chronic or unremitting hypoxic threat. The ever-present HIF proteins then activate the compensatory cascades discussed above, promoting endometriotic lesion growth and the invasion into healthy cells. In contrast, with heavy menstrual bleeding researchers have found lower levels of HIF proteins. On the surface, this might suggest hypoxia is not involved, but I suspect it is. I just don’t know how exactly. There are hints to suggest I am correct. The question is why are the HIF proteins lower in women who bleed more heavily and higher in women with endometriosis? Is the bleeding another mechanism to deal with an unresolved localized hypoxia; one mediated perhaps by a different hormonal milieu?

Hypoxic Spirals and Mitochondrial Metabolism

In either case, aberrant HIF tells us that mitochondrial metabolism is altered. What it does not tell us is why or how. In many regards, however, the why and how may not matter. There are so many factors capable of affecting mitochondrial metabolism that determining THE factor is all but meaningless and perhaps a fool’s errand inasmuch as mitochondrial phenotypes even with the same genotypes are rarely consistent. More often than not, mitochondrial symptoms express with tremendous variability even among family members. This owes largely to the fact that mitochondria, as the cell danger sensors, are malleable by just about everything from nutritional status to genetics to environmental exposures and anything in between. In fact, something as simple as a nutrient deficiency, even a low-level one, can induce mitochondrial hypoxia. Carried out across time, the disease processes evoked appear identical to their genetic counterparts, and can induce de novo mutations generationally, effectively blurring the once hard and fast distinctions between genetic and environmental disease processes.

High calorie malnutrition, diets high in sugars and processed foods loaded in environmental chemicals but deficient in actual nutrients induce hypoxia. Many of agricultural, industrial and medical chemicals have been linked directly to endometriosis. Generationally, the effects are compounded. Consider DDTDioxinsPBCs, and DES. All are genotoxic, damage mitochondria and have been linked to endometriosis. Linkages to heavy menstrual bleeding are less well known, due to a complete lack of research. However, if we consider fibroids are one the most common causes of heavy menstrual bleeding, rodent research shows clear connections between long term, low level, food exposures to glyphosate, Bt toxin, and adjuvants, the chemical cocktail found in Roundup and used on genetically modified crops, to fibroid tumor growth. I suspect the accumulation of these and other toxins are keys to understanding the cell level hypoxia associated with heavy menstrual bleeding. The fibroid, like the endometriotic implant, may represent a mechanism to sequester toxicants, or in the case of heritable damage, remediate a flaw in bioenergetics with the resulting hypoxia a side-effect that then initiates its own survival cascades – the hypoxic spiral.

Hypoxic spirals are quite easy to initiate but somewhat difficult to stop, especially when resource availability is limited because of genetic or environmental liabilities. Consider the self-perpetuating cascades in iron deficiency or anemia, common in women. Anemia induces cell level hypoxia, which induces heavy bleeding. The heavy bleeding then induces or maintains the anemia. Similarly, Lupron, a medication used for both endometriosis and fibroids causes cell level hypoxia directly by damaging the mitochondria and reducing their metabolic flexibility. Hormonal contraceptives do as well. Indeed, one could argue that since all medications and vaccines damage the mitochondria by some mechanism or another, the ability to consume oxygen is necessarily impaired by modern therapeutics for all who use these chemicals. Reproductive ailments may simply be one set of manifestations among many. This begs the question, however, if cellular hypoxia can be induced so easily, in virtually anyone, why is it that some women develop endometriosis and/or heavy menstrual bleeding and others do not. In other words, why aren’t all women plagued with these disease processes? Increasingly, they are.

Damage to female reproductive function, colloquially referred to as ‘period problems’, has become almost commonplace in modern cultures affecting some 80% of the female population. Whether the issues present as endometriosis, adenomyosis, PCOS, fibroids, heavy bleeding or other menstrual or reproductive disease processes, may not matter. The nexus of each may be indicative of cell level hypoxia with the different phenotypes contingent on the individual’s cocktail of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental exposures and resources.

Treatment Possibilities

If hypoxia lay at the root of these disease processes, to the extent that the hypoxia can be resolved affords new treatment opportunities; ones that not only tackle root causes, rather than symptoms, but may also affect the totality of the individual’s health. Hypoxia, barring obstruction, is a metabolic disturbance. Whether the origins are genetic, epigenetic or environmental, metabolism resides in the mitochondria. If we support the mitochondria, provide the mitochondria with the resources, the fuel to perform the tasks they are proscribed to perform, rather than continually damaging or blocking innate signaling pathways needed for cell survival, we may just be able to, if not eliminate these disease processes, at least manage them and improve quality of life. I think this is worth looking into, don’t you?

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

Graphic credits: Tony Grist (Photographer’s own files) [CC0], via Wikimedia Commons

This article was originally published on May 9, 2017. 

Conquering the Uterus – Trends in Hysterectomy

6990 views

Every 10 minutes, 12 American women lose their reproductive organs, every day of every year. Hysterectomy is second only to cesarean in common surgeries. Approximately 660 women die each year in the United States from complications related to hysterectomy. Thousands more suffer long term side effects associated with oophorectomy – removal of the ovaries. The most common reasons for hysterectomy include:  uterine fibroids or rather the menorrhagia, heavy bleeding associated with the fibroids and endometriosis, an incredibly painful condition where uterine tissue grows outside the uterus. Both conditions are hormonally modulated, plague millions of women and take years to develop.

One would think that with such extended period of disease progression, 5-10 years, researchers and clinicians would have ample opportunity to develop innovative treatment protocols, long before the surgical removal of the uterus was necessitated. One would be wrong. Despite the cost of long term care leading to, and as a result of the hysterectomy; despite the outcry from the hundreds of patient associations, some with high profile members; despite the billions of dollars spent annually on performing what should be last resort surgeries, there has been no innovation in diagnostic tools for these conditions and no new therapeutics for women’s reproductive health developed in over 50 years, unless you call the re-purposing of old meds innovation.

Instead, innovation in women’s healthcare, much like American healthcare in general only magnified exponentially, comes at the end of the disease progression – when no other choice but surgery exists. Let’s build a cool robotic tool to remove even more uteri. Sure it will cost significantly more and have a higher complication rate, but the technology is so impressive that does not matter. Forget about developing early diagnostics and less invasive, more effective therapeutics, just take it all out and look cool doing so. Who would not want to perform surgery remotely with a million dollar piece of medical technology? Women don’t need their uteri anyway – a win win for all involved.

Robotic Assisted Hysterectomy

The robotic, joystick controlled, remote surgical tool is an impressive piece of engineering. With a price tag of over a million dollars per, it provides the cutting edge stature that all top-notch hospitals strive for. An added bonus, it makes gynecology, the long derided medical profession, the cool kid on the block. But does it work?

Well, not really. Sure it removes a woman’s uterus more quickly and with less scarring; a single ½ inch belly button scare versus two or three ½ inch abdominal scars, but it costs more and doesn’t reduce complications – may even increase them a bit. Compared to the minimally invasive laparoscopic hysterectomy, the robotic assisted hysterectomy costs $2000 more per procedure. As of 2010, about a quarter of all hysterectomies were performed robotically. That’s about $300 million dollars per year more to perform a robotic hysterectomy with no added gain health.  When combined with the costs multiple hospital stays, ineffective therapeutics and possible other surgeries that often led up to the hysterectomy, it is clear why women’s healthcare is so expensive.

Perhaps we could use our health dollars a little more wisely. Maybe we should spend some of those many billions of dollars or even a fraction of the $300 million spent annually on robot surgery, on prevention, early diagnostics or more effective therapeutics.

Update

Since this article was originally published in 2013, additional reports of complication rates for robotic surgery have been published. In a study of 298 patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy published in 2015, the complication rate was 18%. In 2017, a study of complication rates of a single surgeon using the robot, was 5.5% suggesting that some surgeons are better with this tool than others. In comparison, a study looking at 4505 hysterectomies performed by the same team between 1990 and 2006 (3190 were performed by laparoscopy, 906 by the vaginal route and 409 by laparotomy) saw the complication rates below 1%, significantly lower than that of the robotic surgeries, but again demonstrating that the skill of the surgical team is paramount.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

Photo by Sander Sammy on Unsplash.

This article was published originally on March 18, 2013.

An Often Overlooked Cause of Fatigue: Low Ferritin

55994 views

Fatigue is a very common complaint, reported to general practice doctors up to 25 percent of office visits. The incidence of fatigue is even higher than this, however, since many people experiencing fatigue do not report it to their doctors. Many people are tired because of busy lives, work and home obligations, and not getting enough rest. Fatigue is also a component of many illnesses and chronic diseases. Often fatigue is dismissed by doctors either as being a normal part of life, or as being a result of emotional disturbances or stress. Women are three times more likely to have fatigue than men.

Iron Deficiency Anemia

One common cause of fatigue in reproductive age, menstruating women is iron deficiency anemia. A lesser known cause but possibly equally prevalent is low ferritin, caused by low iron stores. Iron deficiency anemia occurs when there is not enough iron in the body, and the production of red blood cells is affected. It can affect up to 20 percent of women. Causes of iron deficiency anemia in menstruating women include heavy periods, gynecological diseases such as fibroids or adenomyosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and gastrointestinal malabsorption.

Iron deficiency anemia is often assessed by taking blood and measuring the hemoglobin level: hemoglobin is a protein in red blood cells that binds to iron, and transports oxygen in the blood. Hemoglobin is measured as part of a complete blood count (CBC). Normal hemoglobin range in the blood is usually 12 to 15 g/dL, but the normal range can vary slightly depending on the lab. In iron deficiency anemia hemoglobin values are lower than 12 g/dL.

Symptoms of iron deficiency anemia include:

  • Fatigue
  • Shortness of breath
  • Dizziness
  • Headaches
  • Cold hands and feet
  • Pale skin
  • Chest pain
  • Weakness
  • Restless legs syndrome

Iron deficiency anemia is usually easily recognized and treated. The CBC is a very commonly performed blood test, and low hemoglobin, plus other results contained within the CBC panel, is a good indicator of iron deficiency anemia. It is treated with oral iron, which can be obtained in drug stores without a prescription. Side effects of oral iron include nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, dark colored stools, and abdominal pain. Iron supplements should not be taken without having a doctor monitor the blood levels of iron, since too much iron can cause buildup of excess iron and organ damage.

Low Ferritin and Fatigue

Although the importance of treating iron deficiency anemia is well recognized, many health practitioners do not test the body’s iron stores, and low iron stores, indicated by low ferritin levels, can also cause fatigue. Ferritin is a protein that stores iron in the body. It is not measured by the CBC, but can be measured by a separate blood test. Usually the only consequence of low ferritin is thought to be that it might put a person at risk for developing iron deficiency anemia. However, low ferritin on its own, even without anemia, can cause fatigue.

Several studies have shown that in people with fatigue, with normal hemoglobin levels, oral iron supplementation can improve fatigue. This was particularly true when ferritin levels were below 50 µg/L. Intravenous iron supplementation is another option for treatment and may be particularly appropriate if the ferritin levels are below 15 µg/L. Most labs use 12 -150 µg/L as the normal range for women for ferritin, although this may vary from lab to lab. Therefore, many women who could benefit from iron supplementation for fatigue may be classified as having “normal” ferritin levels.

The normal reference ranges are obtained by sampling ferritin concentrations in populations of women, many of whom may have had iron deficiency, and whether the lower limit of the normal range is actually too low has been brought into question. The fact that iron supplementation improves fatigue when ferritin levels are below 50 µg/L would suggest that this is the case. Therefore, all women should be aware that low iron levels can contribute to fatigue even if anemia is not present, that checking ferritin is an important part of an investigation into unexplained fatigue, and that even if their ferritin levels are deemed to be “normal”, that if the levels are below 50 µg/L, iron supplementation may improve their fatigue.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

This post was first published on April 2, 2014. 

In the ER … Again! Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

91877 views

“You really shouldn’t be doing this,” the ER doctor informs me. As if I have any control over my body and its screwed up menstrual cycles. As if I choose this hormonal fate. I want to punch him, but I can barely keep my eyes open to look at him while he talks. “You really need to figure out why you are bleeding so heavy, this isn’t normal.”

If I had enough energy to lift my limp head up off the hospital bed, I would point out the fallacy in his logic – this is not my responsibility. I have been in and out of ER’s and doctors’ offices since I was 18 years old from menstrual bleeding so heavy that I pass out or nearly pass out. It always seems to be more of an inconvenience than a concern for doctors. Oh they are concerned at first. But as soon as I explain my history of this problem, his concern, like all doctors, turns into annoyance. As soon as I tell them I don’t want to take oral contraceptives or any other type of artificial hormone, the concern quickly evaporates like the sweat dripping down my forehead in spite of my shivering body being wrapped up in blankets. Even after I explain my experiences on oral contraceptives (OC) and how the four times I have tried to take it to regulate my periods, I bleed like this every single month, not just occasionally, and that’s on top of the other side effects: extreme depression, weight gain, and epic mood swings that cause my boyfriend to nearly dump me (and who would blame him – I’d dump me if I had to deal with the monster I become on OC).

“Ok” is all I have the energy to muster as I close my eyes to prepare myself for the next cramp I can feel billowing in my lower abdomen. I let the pain wash over me as he continues oblivious to the pain I’m in.

“You need to follow up with your primary or gynecologist,” he tells me. “I’m going to give you progesterone to stop the bleeding…” he goes on to explain the difference between progesterone and estrogen. I don’t stop him to tell him I write for a women’s health ezine or that I’ve done enough research that I likely know more about women’s health and hormones than most general doctors.

A few minutes later my nurse, I’m tempted to start a new religion just so I can appoint her as a saint, walks in with my discharge papers. “Ok honey, I hope you feel better. I’m so happy it’s not an ectopic pregnancy or anything serious.” Throughout the day she has brought in warm blankets and shown more compassion than any doctor I have ever met. I am a problem they can’t fix. They aren’t Dr. House so they’d rather just pass me off to another doctor and move on to a more exotic problem. I’m just a noncompliant patient with hormone problems. God forbid I ask them to think outside the box and figure out what is causing this excessive bleeding. My nurse takes out the IV as careful as you can take out an IV and in a motherly tone says, “I’m glad everything came back normal, but sometimes not knowing is even worse. You go home and take it easy.” I fight back tears. Exhausted and hormonal, I want to hug this woman for her simple acts of kindness and compassion.

“This isn’t really anything new.” I tell her, even though she already knows my medical history. “It sucks, but I’m used to it now.”

“But it shouldn’t be like that,” she says. Like I said, this woman should be appointed as the saint of Emergency Departments.

On my way out of the ER, I stop by the hospital pharmacy and pick up the prescription for hormones that I won’t take. I head back to my office to explain to my male boss that everything was fine and try to make it sound serious enough not to sound like a hypochondriac. He smiles and Okays me to work from home the next day.

I go home to my very concerned boyfriend. I throw the bag with the “magic” pills on the counter and exasperated say, “they gave me IV fluid and hormones, but I’m not taking them.” Naturally, this causes a fight that I don’t have the energy to deal with…again.

Boyfriend: You need to take the medication they give you.

Me: It won’t help and it just messes my system up even more.

Boyfriend: [throws arms in the air … like he’s more exhausted than me at this point?!] You’re not a doctor.

Me: I’m going to bed.

Like every time before, the bleeding slowly lets up in the following days. I’m not a prophet, but I can tell you how this story will end: For the next few weeks, I will walk around like the living dead. I will force myself to eat in spite of having absolutely no appetite. The doctor will call to follow up. “Do you want to take birth control now?” she will ask and when I tell her no, “there’s really nothing more I can do for you at this point…” I know this is how everything will play out because history is simply repeating itself. Sadly I have learned to accept it. In another month, or six, or maybe even a year, I’ll be back in the ER and the cycle will repeat itself again. As I write this I’m so faint that I’m debating going back to the ER to test my blood levels again, but resignation is the only emotion I can muster. Not concern for my own health, but resignation that this is as good as it gets so why fight the system?

So, why do hormones matter? Why don’t hormones matter is a better question. Why is this story an acceptable fate for me and so many other women?

This article was first published on Hormones Matter in July 2013.

Periods from Hell

6536 views

Even from the beginning, my periods have been a little off.  My first period was light but it lasted two weeks.  Some years later I had bouts of nausea and vomiting on the first day of my period. I was eighteen then and I thought God was punishing me for losing my virginity, until I realized that perhaps God had better things to worry about.

Period during Pregnancy

My period even made an appearance when I was pregnant. At about nine or ten weeks into the pregnancy, I started to bleed at work.  It was darker like at the end of a period. I panicked, as any woman would. I thought I was having a miscarriage. The emergency room could not tell me any different.  I was put on bed rest until it stopped.  It went on for two weeks and then stopped just as mysteriously as it began.  My son was born about six months later after an emergency cesarean.  Two years later, my daughter was born also by cesarean.  Perhaps those two c-sections and the tubal ligation are what caused a nightmare that lasted more than a decade.

Tubal Ligation and Heavy Periods

Soon after my tubes were tied, I began to have heavy periods.  They would last over a week.  I would seem to have to change tampons every hour and a half.  When I went to my Ob/Gyn, he put me on birth control pills to snap my hormones back in line.  It worked for a while.  I took them for about three or four months and then stopped.  My periods returned to normal length and flow for a short span of time.  Then, it would start again and I would begin the hormone roller-coaster again.  Every time I went on birth control, I had to take it longer for it to work.  I became frustrated with the fact that my tubes were tied but I was still taking (and paying) for birth control pills.  After six or seven years, my body had become immune to the pills. They no longer worked.  Worse than the heavy periods was the increasing pain.

Heavy Periods plus Searing Pain

My lower back pain stayed with me since the birth of my children, but it got worse as the years went on.  I also developed ovarian cysts and other lower pelvic pain.  I had moved and was seeing a new Ob/Gyn.  This one seemed to make it a race to see how quickly she could get me out of her office.  She didn’t listen to my family history when I told her that every woman in my family had a hysterectomy due to fibroid or endometriosis.  She would send me for ultrasounds and other tests that always came back inconclusive.  But she never attempted to find out why I was in so much pain or why I had to use two tampons just to be vertical.  Her answer was Depo-Provera.  It was a shot to stop my ovulation, and therefore, my period.  Perfect answer, she said.  My periods stopped.  My weight shot up forty pounds.  After two shots, I decided I would never take any hormones again.  So a year later my period came back worse than ever.  I lay on the bed for four days straight with back pain that made me want to punch a nun in the face.  The bleeding would be bad to normal, but it was the pain that was the unbearable.

Fighting to Be Taken Seriously

I changed doctors again.  This time, I went in prepared.  I did my research.  I knew that if it was a fibroid tumor, the scan would have picked it up.  I also knew that many of the suspected conditions could go undetected on such scans.  In fact, that was the problem.  Endometriosis and adenomyosis can go with symptoms and no real answers for years.  As I read the lists on the internet, I recognized signs that I did not even think were linked to my period.  Perhaps my back pain had nothing to do with strained muscles.  Perhaps my UTI symptoms that seemed to appear around the time of my period had more to do with my period than ill timing.

With a list of symptoms and searing pain to remind me exactly where my backbone was, I walked into the office.  I was not going to be bullied or pushed out of the office. She sent me for the same tests: ultrasound and transvaginal ultrasound.  The back pain following the exam almost made me pass out.  This was not normal, I said to myself.  One of the nurses called to try to refer me back to my primary physician.  I told her that this pain came with my period and left when it left.  This was not a primary physician issue.  It was a gynecological issue.  She scheduled another appointment and I saw another doctor that was too quick to push me out.  “The tests were normal, so I don’t know why you are here.  I thought they called you.”  She ‘there there’d’ me and handed me a brochure while she encouraged me to think about getting the inside of my uterus singed or taking something to throw me into menopause.  As I walked into the office for my next appointment, I overheard one of the nurses comment, “yeah, her ultrasound was fine. I don’t know what she’s complaining about.”  That was it.  The doctor came in like nothing was wrong so I flipped my bitch switch and let it go.  “I know this is new for you but this is old for me.  I am tired of going on and off hormones.  Every time I go off them, it is worse.  I don’t want to do ablation because 40% of women end up needing hysterectomies anyway.  I don’t want to chemically force myself into menopause.  I do not want to stick a band aid on this.  There is something wrong.  And while I may not know exactly which bleeding problem it is, I know that ablation is not a definitive answer for any of them.  I’ve had my babies.  It’s time to solve the problem and stop throwing a pill at it.”  She gave in and set up the referral for a surgeon.

Flipping the Bitch Switch

Truth is that I am not sure exactly what it is that I have.  On January 24th, I go in for surgery.  It was not a quick decision by any means.  It came after almost fifteen years of increasing pain and problems.  It came when I decided that I was not going to shut up and fill a prescription.  So please, if you are out there and still struggling with pain and periods that seem like they are in competition with Niagara Falls, find your own bitch switch and let it go.  Because despite what the medical community would rather have us believe, a person can make it all the way through med school and still be a moron.  You know your body better than anyone.  Take care of it.

Adenomyosis

69436 views

Adenomyosis is a common disease of the uterus, yet little is understood about the causes and risk factors, diagnosis is difficult, and there are few effective treatments besides hysterectomy. Adenomyosis can exist on its own, or in conjunction with other pelvic diseases such as endometriosis. The incidence of adenomyosis in the general population is not known, because estimates of incidence have only been done in populations of women undergoing hysterectomy.

Symptoms of adenomyosis may include:

  • Painful periods
  • Painful ovulation
  • Chronic pelvic pain (all month long)
  • Heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding
  • Large blood clots
  • Pain in the thighs

Adenomyosis can sometimes be asymptomatic, and it is not known why some women can get debilitating pain and extremely heavy bleeding from adenomyosis, while others have no symptoms at all.

The medical definition of adenomyosis  is when glandular tissue, normally only found in the endometrium ( the inner lining of the uterus), is found in the myometrium (the muscle wall of the uterus). Adenomyosis used to be commonly called endometriosis interna, or endometriosis of the uterus, because of the similarity to endometriosis, which occurs when tissue similar to the endometrium is found in the pelvis or elsewhere in the body.

The cause of adenomyosis is not known. There are some studies that associate c-sections, prior uterine surgeries, and/or miscarriages with a risk of adenomyosis, although other studies have found no associations. One theory is that invasion of cells from the surface endometrium into the deeper muscular layers of the uterus can result in adenomyosis. In addition, developmental origins have been proposed, where tissue laid down in the wrong place during formation of the embryo can result in adenomyosis later in life. This theory may be the most likely to be true, as there is some support for this theory in the development of endometriosis, and endometriosis and adenomyosis often occur together.

Diagnosis of adenomyosis is difficult, because there are no tests that can definitively confirm or rule out a diagnosis. In some cases, adenomyosis can be suspected from ultrasound results or MRI results, but normal ultrasound or MRI results do not rule out the presence of adenomyosis. Adenomyosis can also be suspected from pelvic exams, when the uterus is large or tender. Since the main symptoms of pelvic pain and heavy bleeding can result from many other causes, it is difficult to diagnose adenomyosis based on symptoms. Other conditions causing similar symptoms include endometriosis, fibroids, and hormonal imbalances.

Sometimes adenomyosis symptoms can be managed with medication. Pain relievers such as NSAIDs can be used to treat pain, and in some cases hormonal medications such as the birth control pill or a Mirena IUD can treat the symptoms by stopping periods. Medications to control heavy bleeding are often not used by gynecologists, but they can be effective and prevent the need for a hysterectomy if heavy bleeding is the only symptom. The most effective medication for heavy bleeding is Lysteda (tranexamic acid), but DDAVP (desmopressin) can also be used.

Endometrial ablation is sometimes a suggested treatment for the heavy bleeding caused by adenomyosis, but it can make adenomyosis pain worse. In addition, adenomyosis may confer a greater likelihood of endometrial ablation failure. Doctors will often say that “the ultimate cure” for adenomyosis is a hysterectomy. Although hysterectomy is obviously effective at curing uterine pain and heavy menstrual bleeding, it is a major surgery and sometimes has unwanted effects and complications . If we understood the causes of adenomyosis better, we might be able to develop more specific treatments for the underlying cause or causes, and avoid such extreme surgery.

It is commonly stated on medical websites that adenomyosis goes away after menopause. However, it was often said that endometriosis goes away after menopause, and now it is known that for at least some women, maybe most, it does not. We don’t really know the incidence of endometriosis post-menopause because women who complain of pelvic pain after menopause are usually told that the pain cannot be endometriosis, and are not investigated for endometriosis, even if they have a previous history of it. It may be a similar fallacy to believe that adenomyosis goes away after menopause.

It is also often said that adenomyosis is more common in women over 35. The idea that it is more common in older women may come from the fact that it can only definitively be diagnosed by pathology studies post-hysterectomy. Older women with pelvic pain and/or heavy menstrual bleeding may be more willing to have a hysterectomy to solve the problem than younger women, who may want to keep their uterus for child-bearing. Therefore, adenomyosis ends up getting diagnosed more often in the older age group, but may be just as common in younger women. In fact, adenomyosis is starting to be diagnosed more often in younger women, using better imaging techniques.

There are many unanswered questions about adenomyosis and more research is needed in many areas of this disease. Better methods for diagnosis would be extremely helpful, as at the moment adenomyosis can only be confirmed by hysterectomy. Answers about why some women have such severe symptoms while others have none, what causes adenomyosis in the first place, whether it really can persist after menopause, and more, may help lead to less invasive and more effective treatments for this disease.