osteoporosis

From Severe Osteoporosis to Recovery: An Unlikely Success Story

10062 views

I was first diagnosed with severe osteoporosis when I was thirteen years old. I am now thirty three. My osteoporosis was secondary to prolonged malnutrition, delayed development and low weight caused by severe gut complications stemming from Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (EDS) – a heritable connective tissue that runs in my family. Osteoporosis can be a very challenging disease to treat, as bone is incredibly slow to rebuild.

It’s hard to describe the fear associated with having osteoporosis at any age – the sense of porosity in the structure holding you together, the deep dread of your fragility holding you back from participating fully in life, the terror that you could sustain a serious fracture, which among the elderly, could be fatal.

Living with osteoporosis constantly challenged my confidence. I couldn’t help internalize the feelings of failure and weakness for having bones more fragile and brittle than someone nearing the end of their life, let alone just beginning it. Subsequent bone injuries from exercise (including hip stress fractures and shin splints) were a constant source of both pain and stress.

For years following my diagnosis, I had no clear way to treat the illness, as the causes of my debilitating gut issues and low weight remained a mystery, until my early twenties when I was diagnosed with EDS.

I remember the first time I had a DEXA (bone density) scan following my EDS diagnosis. The osteoporosis had gotten worse, not better. The junior doctor allocated to discuss my results could not contain their shock and had to leave the room at one point. My spine was particularly bad with a T score of -4.5. For context on what this means:

  • Normal: 0 to -1
  • Osteopenia: -1 to -2.5
  • Osteoporosis: -2.5 or lower
  • Severe osteoporosis: -3.5 or lower

I felt overwhelmed navigating all of the literature on how best to treat osteoporosis. And I struggled to overcome the terror instilled in me from looking at too many photos of brittle, hollow bones. I couldn’t help feeling awfully hollow inside.

Given the severity of my condition, I was encouraged to take bisphosphonates – a class of drugs that slow down bone loss. However, researching the side-effects (which include bone and joint pain, jaw problems, gut and kidney issues), I decided against this. Considering what I stood to lose by not treating the osteoporosis, this was not a decision that I took lightly.

Instead, I pored through journal articles, books and videos, eventually cobbling together a plan of action that integrated nutrition and exercise to heal my bones.

It’s important to mention here that I consider treating bone health just one part of treating overall health. My overall health was very compromised, so I had to take a holistic approach.

Treating my severe gut issues was my first priority. My gut was so dysfunctional that it regularly became impacted and was often silent on ultrasounds, indicating little to no movement was taking place. I often ended up in hospital in agonizing intestinal pain from all the pockets of air that would form around the sites of impaction. I began taking an entero-kinetic medication to help restore peristalsis to my gut. This enabled food to move through and nutrition to be absorbed. It also helped me to increase my food intake.

My gut flora was really compromised from years of malnutrition and dysmotility, so I also began a course of herbal therapy. The herbs were originally prescribed to treat another condition I was dealing with (chronic neurological Lyme disease), however they also ended up massively improving my gut. I know this because prior to starting the herbs, I suffered from multiple food intolerances and major FODMAP issues. After taking herbs for eighteen months, all of my gut problems subsided and I can now eat all foods with no discomfort, including dairy products which I have struggled with all of my life. This made getting adequate calcium from my diet a lot easier than simply relying on supplements. The herbs I used are those prescribed for Lyme disease by American herbalist Stephen Buhner, and adapted by Dr. Bill Rawls. You can see specific ingredients at Dr. Rawls’ website by searching (see Advanced Biotic and Adaptogen Recovery).

Fixing up my gut allowed me to eat from a wide range of foods, but critically it enabled me to restore my weight to a healthy level. I was underweight from the ages of thirteen to thirty, which led to primary amenorrhea. Restoring my weight and menstrual cycles played a vital role in helping protect my bones. Low weight is the most common cause of hypothalamic amenorrhea, and this lack of periods leads to estrogen deficiency which adversely affects peak bone mass and increases the risk of osteoporosis.

I follow a healthy whole foods diet, however I am no purist. After years of restrictive diets in the hope of fixing my gut problems, I am now a big believer in non-restrictive approaches to eating. In my experience, scarcity mindsets and restrictive eating rarely does good things for our bodies and minds. So, I now eat from a wide variety of foods, and have no foods which I consider off-limits. I would say my diet primarily comprises fresh fruits and vegetables (several, with plenty of different colors, at every meal), whole grains, legumes, nuts and seeds, goat’s milk yoghurt, avocados, parmesan cheese, seafood (particularly fatty fish like salmon, and sardines), tofu and tempeh, grass-fed whey protein powder, root vegetables, and a little lean meat mainly in the form of kangaroo and chicken.

In addition to restoring my gut health, I added in a range of supplements to strengthen my bones. After researching multivitamins, I settled on the Calton’s Nutreince because it is available as a powder (EDS can make swallowing capsules challenging) and was formulated specifically to treat osteoporosis. You can read more about the multiyear process that the Calton’s went through to develop this product in their book Rebuild Your Bones.

Nutreince contains 500mg of highly absorbable calcium citrate together with Vitamin K1 & K2, Vitamin D3 and other bioavailable micronutrients that are crucial for bone health. I took a little extra Vitamin D on top of that found in Nutreince, to bring my daily intake up to 3000 IU, ditto with calcium to ensure I was getting 1200mg of calcium per day from a combination of food and supplementation. The food sources I relied on for calcium primarily included things like parmesan cheese, goat’s yoghurt, grass-fed whey protein powder, salmon with the bones, sardines, and to a lesser extent nuts, legumes and leafy green vegetables.

The remaining part of my action plan was exercise. I took up high load strength training, supervised by an exercise physiologist. I train three times per week for an hour each time (including mini rest breaks between sets). My program includes a rotating range of moves, but for the bones particularly – bench presses, deadlifts, and squats. I am currently squatting 45kg, deadlifting 50kg, and bench pressing 30kg. Each week, I aim to increase the weight that I lift, such that I can do 5 reps, with only 2 remaining reps in reserve (i.e. I could only lift that weight another 2 times before running out of strength). For context, I weigh 56kg, so I am gradually moving up to be able to lift more than my body weight. I never imagined myself lifting weights, but the feeling of strength I am building through each successive session is a wonderful experience.

I also removed some things. These included: long distance running – which, in my case, was stimulating excess cortisol and increasing my rate of injury. Given my history of gut issues, I tend to find it hard to fuel this level of endurance exercise (I used to run half marathons), which in turn sets me up for a higher risk of lower bone density. In time, this may shift, but for now, I am sticking to shorter distances and thinking of resuming soccer, given its fun and research shows it contributes to strong bone density. Bones get strong when they are loaded from multiple directions, hence sports like soccer are great, compared to things like long distance running which involve moving only in one direction for a long time.

I also worked on reducing my overall stress levels. I was a chronic workaholic, so (not without difficulty) I reduced my work hours, took up meditation and started therapy. I also gave up coffee, given research linking caffeine and bone loss. I have never drunk alcohol, which when consumed regularly and in large amounts, can also increase the risk of low bone density. However these choices are personal only, and coffee and alcohol in moderation, may not be a problem for some.

So in summary, this is what I did:

  1. Healed my gut and overcame my food intolerances with herbal therapy
  2. Increased my food intake (from a wide, unrestricted range of whole foods) to restore my weight and menstrual cycle
  3. Ensured intake of key nutrients needed for bone – from both supplementation and diet – equivalent to 1200mg calcium, 3000 IU of Vitamin D and at least 120mcg of Vitamin K1 & K2
  4. Added in supervised strength training 3x per week building to being able to lift more than my own body weight

So, how did all of this stack up? The proof is in the results. Below is a summary of my T scores over the past four years.

A few things to note before you read these results:

  • Bone can take up to nine years to remodel, so these results are showing you only partial results of the changes I’ve primarily made in the past three years
  • These results have been achieved since turning thirty, which is the age at which peak bone mass is achieved.
  • Regarding the hip scores – the 2022 measurements were done using a more sensitive measurement technology called QCT, as opposed to DEXA technology used in previous measurements. QCT consistently produces lower scores than DEXA, so is not a fair comparison with the 2020 and 2018 scores. If these were DEXA scores, they would likely be higher, i.e. show greater improvement.
2022 2020 2018
Spine -1.1 -3.6 -4.2
Femoral neck -1.59 -1.8 -2.3
Total hip -2.13 -1.7 -2.4

You should always seek your own medical advice when treating something as complex and serious as osteoporosis, however these results show that it is entirely possible to reverse osteoporosis through nutrition and exercise, without having to endure the side effects of conventional pharmacological treatments, nor the ongoing fears that living with the prospect of an incurable disease too often instills.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, and like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

This article was published originally on June 1, 2022. 

A Forty Year Battle With ME/CFS

2974 views

The Road to ME/CFS

I had a hysterectomy at age 35 for adenomyosis. Following the surgery, I developed an infected hematoma and was given IV antibiotics for three days. I returned to work after 4 weeks feeling very fragile, but as a single mother, money was a necessity as I had no back up financial plan. I am not sure that I fully recovered. Soon after, I developed unrelenting fatigue, body pain, and brain fog. Seven months into this nightmare of extreme fatigue (sleeping up to 18 hours per day), headaches, severe joint pain, and many GP visits, the doctors decided that I had glandular fever. Blood tests taken by a hematologist, confirmed toxoplasmosis, a parasitic infection, and two courses of Dalacin C (clindamycin) antibiotic were prescribed. “Take this short course and you’ll soon be well again”. Forty years later, I’m still recovering!

After about 18 months of symptoms, I was diagnosed with myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), by a neurologist. This was in 1984. I was just 36 years old. No treatments or recognition by general practitioners was offered. I searched for treatments and discovered a US doctor who suggested Zantac – (Ranitidine, sold under the brand name Zantac among others, is a medication used to decrease stomach acid production). It was a breakthrough for me and my brain fog dissipated, although I reacted to a full strength dose and had to retreat to about a ⅛ of tablet to gain benefits. Unfortunately, I don’t recollect the physician’s name but I imported the cassette tapes of his talks and passed on to my GP who actually listened to them.

Cortisone Induced Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency

Early on, I suffered painful polyarthralgia particularly in my hands. My then GP prescribed a 5-day course of cortisone to reduce the inflammation. I returned to the clinic on morning of last dose of cortisone, which I hadn’t taken, and collapsed in front of the doctor. I was faint and sweaty and nauseated, so he put me in the back room to recover. After many questions, he decided I needed an injection of cortisone to get me upright and able to drive home. This began the start of the next 4 1/2 years of devastating secondary adrenal insufficiency and Addisonian crises. Addisonian crises are life-threatening bouts of severely low blood pressure, low blood sugar, and high blood levels of potassium.

I just could not wean off cortisone. Every time I weaned down to a small amount, I collapsed, requiring emergency treatment of adrenaline, cortisone and an extended recovery time. I put on heaps of weight and looked like a big water balloon. I consulted endocrinologists who insisted I reduce my cortisone intake, but every time, I weaned to a low level – boom –Addisonian crisis. I was so unhappy and unhealthy.

An endocrinologist recommended I have an ACTH Stimulation using Synacthen, which is a manufactured drug that acts like adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) by stimulating the adrenal gland to produce more cortisol. This is a very specific test for diagnosing adrenal insufficiency. I told him I was nervous about the test as I knew there could be serious side effects. He brushed me off and I booked for the test.

Unfortunately, and almost predictably, I had an anaphylactic reaction and spent a night in intensive care. His comments “well that happens in about 1 in 10,000 people, so I’ve just had my 10,000!”

This was my life for 4.5 years. I was still endeavoring to work as a medical administrator with little compassion from my employer who just kept on saying “you need to get off the roids!!”

Vitamin C To Support the Adrenals and Wean Off Cortisone

Eventually, I was unable to work at all and found a general practitioner who had studied nutritional and environmental medicine. He categorically stated he could get me off cortisone with Vitamin C, which he said, supports the adrenal glands. I was doubtful but figured at least it would do me no harm.

For 9 months, I consumed much ascorbic acid and had weekly intravenous infusions of Vitamin C. I spent a couple of nights in hospital (just in case) and was finally free of cortisone. So much affection and blessings for my GP whom I’ve now regularly consulted for the past 27 years.

My health certainly improved after weaning off cortisone. My facial color was healthier and I had reasonable energy. No more ‘crashes’ which gave me much more stability. I had been gluten/dairy and sugar free for 5 years and had a partnership with a friend developing and delivering conferences for the medical fraternity and the general public. We ‘sold’ our illness back to medicos – a rather uplifting feeling.

A Possible Protocol For ME/CFS

In 1992, I undertook the very controversial Marshall Protocol to treat the ME/CFS. I did this protocol for approximately 5 years, as I was still ‘crashing’ and experiencing a lack of energy and brain fog regularly. The protocol suggests varying combinations of pulsed, low doses of specific bacteriostatic antibiotics, Olmesartan, a blood pressure drug, and the avoidance of Vitamin D. It was a struggle for sure, but I managed about five years on the Protocol and did very well. Had stability and much more energy. This is medically prescribed and I needed prescriptions from my GP who understood the underlying theory for the Protocol. I eventually weaned off all drugs and stayed well.

Diet and Symptoms

I have changed my diet at different times. I am currently grain free as best as I can. I have had to remove some foods as I suffer gout from time to time so keep my uric acid levels low. I only eat berries now as sucrose has been implicated in gout.

I now have a chronic inflammatory condition which includes osteoarthritis in almost every joint of my body and have had two episodes of CRPS (complex regional pain syndrome). I am very reactive to some drugs – morphine, anti-inflammatories, codeine, some antibiotics, and surprisingly, turmeric.

After weaning off cortisone, I spent five years, dairy, sugar and gluten free and now keep dairy to a minimum and don’t consume processed foods as they contain too much sugar and nasty vegetable oils. I learned a lot from the Weston A. Price Foundation and attended a couple of Sally Fallon’s conferences here in Brisbane where I finally learned the truth about food – no low fats products and use animal fats to cook in!

My health had improved and I volunteered for a wonderful not for profit organization The Pyjama Foundation, where Pyjama Angels read and assist children in foster care for an hour a week. I enjoyed my five years with them and became an “Angel Trainer” – a great title. I retired from that 5 years ago with great disappointment as it was the best unpaid job I’d ever had.

My health was deteriorating and I couldn’t make that commitment any more. Unfortunately, I have no contact with my son and daughter or grandchildren. They have no understanding of this ME/CFS and are not supportive.

Where I Am Now

I am now metabolically inflexible with weight gain, elevated blood pressure and glucose levels requiring me to add some new pharma drugs. I am working with a low carb diet and my weight is ever so slowly decreasing.

In July 2020, I was involved in a car accident and have not recovered to an extent I’m happy with. Then in May of this year, I had a trip onto my bathroom floor and that has set me back again with an injured knee that requires treatment. That is one thing with chronic illness, every little thing needs to be thoroughly checked. I had lots of x-rays for my knee because of severe pain but it wasn’t until I had an MRI 2 weeks ago that my injuries were discovered needing more attention.

Life has certainly thrown many health challenges my way since then and in the past two years I was diagnosed with glaucoma with some loss of sight and chronic kidney disease and liver dysfunction. I believe the glaucoma was caused by excessive cortisone, as is the chronic kidney disease and liver issues.

So 40 years on my health journey with ME/CFS and I am still upright. I am so cautious around cortisone and most drugs. Unfortunately, I developed acute dermatitis and had to use many, many tubes of cortisone cream – a love, hate relationship with this drug. It can be lifesaving but side effects can be brutal.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

Photo by Johnny Cohen on Unsplash.

Uterus and Ovaries: Fountain of Youth

7869 views

Numerous studies have shown a strong correlation between removal of both ovaries / bilateral oophorectomy (castration) and accelerated aging as measured by an increased risk of chronic health conditions. Hysterectomy / uterus removal with preservation of both ovaries is also associated with some of these chronic conditions. These include heart disease, stroke, metabolic syndrome, osteoporosis, hip fracture, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, dementia, Parkinsonism, impaired cognition and memory, mood disorders, sleep disorders, adverse skin and body composition changes, adverse ocular changes including glaucoma, impaired sexual function, more severe hot flushes and urogenital atrophy. Wow, that’s quite a list!

Ovaries: Health Powerhouses

This 2016 article titled “Study: Remove ovaries, age faster” sums up the findings of Mayo Clinic researchers proving yet again the harmful and unethical practice of ovary removal. The study found that ovary removal (oophorectomy) is associated with a higher incidence of 18 chronic conditions and should be discontinued in women who are not at high risk for ovarian cancer. Although this study cites the increase in chronic conditions in women who undergo oophorectomy before age 46, other studies have shown that oophorectomy even after menopause does more harm than good. Here is one that showed that to be true up to age 75.

The ovaries have both reproductive and endocrine functions as detailed in this International Menopause Society article. After menopause, the ovaries produce mostly androgens, some of which are converted into estrogen. Testosterone levels are more than 40% lower in women without ovaries compared to intact women. Women without their uterus likewise have lower levels but not as low as women without ovaries per this article. Estrogen therapy mitigates some but not all of the increased health risks of oophorectomy. But estrogen further reduces androgen levels increasing risk of osteoporosis and fracture. Nothing can replace the lifelong functions of the ovaries (and uterus).

The Uterus / Ovaries / Tubes Connection

The harms of ovary removal would also apply to ovarian failure that commonly occurs after hysterectomy and some other medical treatments. As previously cited, women who have had a hysterectomy have lower levels of testosterone. According to this 1986 publication, 39% of these women showed signs of ovarian failure. This study showed a nearly 2-fold increased risk of ovarian failure when both ovaries were preserved and nearly 3-fold when one was preserved. This likely explains the increased risk of heart disease and metabolic conditions as shown by multiple studies including this recent Mayo Clinic one. However, per this 1982 study, the uterus itself protects women from heart disease via the uterine substance prostacyclin. Loss of bone density is another harm of hysterectomy as shown by multiple studies such as this one.

Removal of even one ovary (unilateral oophorectomy) without hysterectomy is also harmful. Studies out of the Mayo Clinic showed increased risks of cognitive impairment or dementia and parkinsonism. Colorectal cancer is another increased risk according to this Chinese study and this Swedish one.

The Fallopian tubes appear to impair ovarian function to some degree as evidenced by Post Tubal Ligation / Sterilization Syndrome. This study shows an increase in Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) after tube removal (salpingectomy).

Ovarian impairment after hysterectomy or salpingectomy is thought to be the mechanism of the reduced risk of ovarian cancer which is already rare.

The Uterus: Anatomy, Sex, Cancer Prevention

Hysterectomy is associated with other harms besides impaired ovarian / endocrine function. The uterus and its ligaments / pelvic support structures are essential for pelvic organ integrity as well as skeletal integrity. The effects on these structures and functions are detailed here and here. This article shows the many hysterectomized women lamenting their “broken bodies” – changes to their figures, back, hip and midsection pain, pelvic pain, bladder and bowel issues, and effects of severed nerves and blood vessels.

The uterus and associated nerves and blood vessels play a key role in sexuality and vibrancy. You can hear the desperation in women’s comments about the devastating sexual losses and feelings of emotional emptiness.

There is an increased risk of renal cell, thyroid, and colorectal cancers after hysterectomy. How ironic when cancer fear tactics are commonly used to market hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy.

Adhesions that commonly form after these surgeries can cause serious problems especially in the long term. Surgical complications – nerve injuries, bladder, bowel and ureter injuries, vaginal cuff dehiscence, a too short vagina, infections, hemorrhage – are more common than indicated by gynecologists.

Although “The Miraculous Uterus” article fails to mention the anatomical harms, it is otherwise “spot on.” It talks about the “ovarian conservation scam” and that “passion, love, ecstasy, the emotional essence that drives human achievement, forever after elude them.” This explains why “there’s no effective outrage against the barbarism of hysterectomy.”

Compelling Evidence of Harm

Clearly, there is compelling medical evidence that both hysterectomy and oophorectomy are destructive surgeries. Unfortunately, some hysterectomy forums censor negative posts giving a slanted view of the life shattering effects. Here is a sampling of women’s experiences on the Gyn Reform site.

The medical literature on the harms of these surgeries dates back over a century. Listed below are a small number of the numerous publications (minus the ovarian failure studies cited above). The Gyn Reform website has a fairly comprehensive list of resources on oophorectomy. Its Ovaries for Life sister site provides a good overview of the lifelong importance of our ovaries.

1912 – The Physiological Influence of Ovarian Secretion

1914 – Nervous and Mental Disturbances following Castration in Women

1958 – The controversial ovary

1973 – Osteoporosis after Oophorectomy for Non-malignant Disease in Premenopausal Women

“Oophorectomy before the age of 45 years was found to be associated with a significantly increased prevalence of osteoporosis within three to six years of operation.

1974 – Endocrine Function of the Postmenopausal Ovary: Concentration of Androgens and Estrogens in Ovarian and Peripheral Vein Blood

1978 – The emotional and psychosexual aspects of hysterectomy

1981 – Premenopausal hysterectomy and cardiovascular disease

1981 – Sexual response after hysterectomy-oophorectomy: Recent studies and reconsideration of psychogenesis

1981 – The role of estrogen and oophorectomy in immune synovitis

1982 – Prostacyclin from the uterus and woman’s cardiovascular advantage

1989 – The effects of simple hysterectomy on vesicourethral function

“The results show that simple hysterectomy is associated with a significant incidence of post-operative vesicourethral dysfunction and that there is an identifiable neurological abnormality incurred at operation which is pertinent to the subsequent disordered voiding.

1990 – Effects of bilateral oophorectomy on lipoprotein metabolism

1994 – The climacteric ovary as a functional gonadotropin-driven androgen-producing gland

1996 – Urinary incontinence in older women: who is at risk? Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group

“Urinary incontinence is a common problem in older women, more common than most chronic medical conditions. Of the associated factors that are preventable or modifiable, obesity and hysterectomy may have the greatest impact on the prevalence of daily incontinence.

1997 – Bladder, bowel and sexual function after hysterectomy for benign conditions

1998 – Ovaries, androgens and the menopause: practical applications

1998 – Impairment of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons associated with aging and long-term loss of ovarian function

1998 – Influence of bilateral oophorectomy upon lipid metabolism

1999 – Estrogen and movement disorders

2000 – The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and gonadal axes in rheumatoid arthritis

2000 – Risk of myocardial infarction after oophorectomy and hysterectomy

2000 – Hysterectomy, Oophorectomy, and Endogenous Sex Hormone Levels in Older Women: The Rancho Bernardo Study

2005 – Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease

Ovarian conservation until age 65 benefits long-term survival…. There is sustained, but decreasing, benefit until the age of 75, when excess mortality for oophorectomy is less than 1%.

2007 – Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease

Approximately 78% of women between the ages of 45 and 64 years have prophylactic oophorectomy when hysterectomy is performed for benign disease. Therefore, the decision to perform prophylactic oophorectomy should be approached with great caution for the majority of women who are at low risk of developing ovarian cancer.”

2009 – Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the nurses’ health study

In no analysis or age group was oophorectomy associated with increased survival.

2010 – Current indications and role of surgery in the management of sigmoid diverticulitis

A previous history of hysterectomy is a valuable clinical clue to the correct diagnosis as colovaginal and colovesical fistulas are rare in females with their uterus in place, as the uterus becomes a screen interposed between the inflamed colon and the bladder and vagina.”

2012 – Oophorectomy for whom and at what age? Primum non nocere

2016 – Study: Remove ovaries, age faster

2017 – Cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation: a cohort study

A Harmful Practice That Won’t Die

Ovary removal / castration was introduced by Robert Battey in 1872 and “was practised widely for several decades….. Better insight into female physiology and ovarian function finally pushed the sinister operation of Robert Battey from the scene.” This publication refers to Battey’s operation as “barbaric.”

Despite the long-standing and compelling evidence of harm, these surgeries continue at alarming rates. Publications are misleading in that they report inpatient surgeries despite the large majority being outpatient (70% in 2014). This 2008 article reported that oophorectomies “more than doubled in frequency since the 1960’s.” According to results of a FOIA request by Ovaries for Life, there are over 700,000 oophorectomies every year despite there being only ~22,000 cases of ovarian cancer. Hysterectomy figures obtained by Ovaries for Life are also shocking at 830,000 in light of less than 70,000 cases of endometrial and cervical cancers.

Many media reports have questioned the high rate of these surgeries since gynecologic cancers are rare. The oldest one I could find was dated 1969. I found about three articles per decade in the mainstream media since then. According to the Athena Institute, half of U.S. medical schools in 1986 “had changed their suggestions and were now recommending a reconsideration of the common practice of ovariectomy.” Evidently, that never took hold.

Congress held two hearings on hysterectomy, one in 1976 and one in 1993. The 1993 transcripts state that the hysterectomy rate increased 250% in women ages 15 to 24 and 186% in ages 25 to 34 from 1965 to 1984! Despite these shocking statistics, it appears that no action was taken after either hearing.

According to this “Reassessing Hysterectomy” article, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality sponsored research and conferences on the overuse of hysterectomy in the 1990’s. This article is packed with information on the prevalence and harms of hysterectomy and oophorectomy as well as alternative treatment options. Yet, the high rate of hysterectomy has continued such that 45% of women will end up having one. Citing 2006 data, the oophorectomy rate was 73% of the hysterectomy rate.

How to End the Harm?

I’ve been researching this subject for over 10 years and sharing my experience and knowledge on various websites. It’s shocking how many women are misled and deceived into these surgeries. Age doesn’t seem to matter; younger and younger women are undergoing these surgeries. This appears to be the biggest surgical racket and women’s healthcare con as discussed here.

There are a number of issues that perpetuate the gross overuse of these harmful surgeries. These include:

  1. These surgeries and “forever after” care are very lucrative.
  2. The public has been led to believe that the female organs are disposable after childbearing is complete.
  3. Medical education and decades of practice have made these surgeries “a standard of care.”
  4. Informed consent is seriously lacking.
  5. Gynecology consent forms are open ended giving surgeons “carte blanche” to remove organs unnecessarily.
  6. We still live in a climate of gender disparity / male dominance.

As you can see from the list of publications above, some study authors have called out the practice of ovary removal as unethical. Numerous professional societies have issued guidelines discouraging its use in most women. But most have been silent on the overuse of hysterectomy despite its many harms.

Why has our government not stepped in to address this egregious harm? Women who have contacted their legislators have been met with indifference. Gyn Reform reported on their experiences with legislators and other authorities who can effect change. The non-profit HERS Foundation has been educating women and advocating for informed consent legislation since the 1980’s.

Why do insurance companies approve so many of these surgeries that are rarely necessary? Not only are the surgeries themselves expensive, treatments for the chronic after effects are costly. Reining in unnecessary treatments especially those that cause lifelong harm would go a long way towards making healthcare more affordable.

Why has Graduate Medical Education (GME) not changed their surgical requirements to favor organ preservation? Each resident must do at least 70 hysterectomies but there is no requirement for myomectomy (fibroid removal). Residents don’t need to do any cystectomies (cyst removals) either which is partly why so many women lose ovaries for benign ovarian cysts. Here are the GME ob/gyn requirements.

A popular mantra at Tufts in the 1970’s – “There’s no room in the tomb for the womb” – reflects this culture of the disposable uterus and gynecologists’ obsession with its removal. Insurance reimbursement rates are also to blame as they incentivize hysterectomy and oophorectomy over myomectomy and cystectomy. In many cases, medical management versus surgery is the appropriate course. The “Reassessing Hysterectomy” article cited above lists a number of treatment options for gynecologic problems. Revamping reimbursement rates to strongly favor organ preservation should eventually force GME to change their requirements. But how do we make that happen?

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

Lucas Cranach the Elder, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

How Do You Deal with the Lasting Effects of Endometriosis?

3953 views

I had my life all planned out. I was going to graduate high school, go to pharmacy school, graduate in four years, and then find a job working at a pharmacy that I loved. I wanted to date and get married and start a family, too. All that changed when I was diagnosed with endometriosis; even though I did not know it at the time.

Fast forward six years and I am a completely different person than I ever thought I would be. Before being diagnosed, I never really understood what people with health problems go through. Now, I do and I am more sympathetic and empathetic to those that have chronic illnesses. I know what it feels like to not be able to do all the things you want to do and love.

Tough Choices with Endo

I have chosen not to finish pharmacy school because my body just cannot handle the stress. I did not want to make this decision. My body has already been through so much. I do not want to put it through anything that may cause more harm. This is the only body I have and I want to make the most of it.

Am I mad? Yes! Will I be able to move on? Yes, because I know that there is a great life ahead of me even if it is not what I had initially planned. I was given endometriosis for a reason and I am not going to let it win. I am going to use what I have been through to help others who also suffer with this disease, as well as the other diseases that come along with endometriosis.

With Endometriosis Comes Many Other Diseases

I have been diagnosed with interstitial cystitis, polycystic ovary syndrome, and osteoporosis, in addition to the endometriosis. I had a hysterectomy at the age of 23. I know I can adopt, but that is a very challenging process to go through. This will make having a family difficult, but not impossible. It may seem like I am giving up because I am not pursuing a dream I had, but I am not. When I was fighting for pharmacy school and for my health, I realized that I just did not have it in me to keep fighting for both. I had to choose my health, because if I did not, I felt like my quality of life would be worse than it is now. If I were to continue pharmacy school, I felt like I would not be able to enjoy the experience. So instead, I am using everything in my power to gain awareness for endometriosis. I encourage people to talk about this disease so that one day there will be a cure. I do not want anyone to ever go through the agonizing heartache and pain I have been through.

When I was first diagnosed, I never thought I would be dealing with endometriosis for the rest of my life. I was sure there was a pill that would help end my pain, but sadly, I was mistaken. I continue to pray that I will wake up one day and not be in pain anymore. However, I have come to the realization that I will be in some kind of pain for the rest of my life. I have to find a way to be able to cope with that pain. I know some people do not understand this, but I have become closer with God since all of this has happened. Many people do not like to hear the saying “everything happens for a reason”, but that is what gets me through each day.

How do you deal with your symptoms of endometriosis and what has the disease stolen from you? Share your story here on Hormones Matter.  Write for us and together we can end endometriosis.

Deer antlers & osteoporosis

2628 views

What do deer antlers and osteoporosis have in common? Manganese.

New research out of Spain suggests that manganese deficiency may be the root cause of osteoporosis in humans. Manganese, a trace mineral responsible for activating a number of enzymatic reactions, is also required for the absorption of calcium into bone. When manganese levels are low, calcium is excreted in urine instead of absorbed into bone.

Researchers identified this connection from an unlikely source, broken deer antlers. An unusually cold winter in Spain 2005 depleted plant manganese stores and by association, deer nutritional status suffered. A subsequent increase in broken deer antlers lead researchers to speculate a possible connection. Analysis of those antlers revealed lower manganese levels associated with lower calcium and higher osteoporotic like antlers – more breakage. The research has yet to be confirmed in humans, but other studies have observed lower manganese in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis.

Dietary manganese can be found in dark leafy greens, berries and several grains like spelt and brown rice.