case reports

A Sick Brain Spells Death: Cases From the Past

7509 views

When I was a newly graduated resident in my teaching hospital in England, I encountered a case that was so dramatic that I have never forgotten the slightest detail. It probably was my very first introduction to the concept that I came to understand as the all-consuming dominance of the brain over the body. The patient was probably in his late 50s or early 60s and was known to have chronic tuberculosis. One night I had to admit him to the hospital with an acute attack of pneumonia, obviously much more dangerous because of the tuberculosis. This was before the days of antibiotics. In fact we only had the very earliest sulfonamide that existed under a code name of M and B 693. The sulfonamides were eventually displaced by the discovery of penicillin that led to the antibiotic era. A sulfonamide had limited powers at the best and was totally useless in this case.

Hospital Wards

In order to describe my experience, I have to describe how patients were admitted to the hospital. There were no private rooms as we have them today. A man was admitted to a male ward and a woman to a female ward. A ward consisted of about 24-28 beds. There was a partition down the center of the ward and the beds were arranged in two rows of six or seven on each side of the partition. The only privacy that the patient could get was a curtain that ran on a rail around each bed. Each ward was presided over by a head nurse who was called Sister. She wore a uniform that distinguished her from the rest of the nurses, including a specialized cap that was derived from the hood worn by lay sisters in the days when the monasteries were the hospitals. The lay sisters were the nurses and the monks were the doctors.

The Dying Patient

On the morning after this patient had been admitted, I was awaiting the arrival of my chief. In those days a chief was virtually a god to a young resident lucky enough to obtain a job under his skilled care. I was standing by the desk that was used by the Sister in the forefront of the ward when I heard my chief, who had quietly entered the ward behind me, say “I see you have a dying patient, Lonsdale”. I respectfully said “How do you know that Sir?” He went on to explain: pointing at my patient, “Notice how that gentleman is picking at the bedclothes with his fingers. Sometimes he picks at thin air. That is evidence for a sick brain and he will die”.

Well, of course he did die and the autopsy not only revealed the presence of tuberculosis and pneumonia, but the entire body and brain were infiltrated with micro-abscesses filled with staphylococcal pus. In the short time that he survived under our care, he never showed any elevation of body temperature, no increase in circulating white blood cells and in fact no laboratory data that was out of the normal range. If I had shown the data to a colleague without telling him the history and asked him to tell me what was wrong with the patient, he would have said that it was a normal laboratory result and therefore no disease. It was my introduction to the basic fact that the brain is the master organ. It is responsible for directing all the mechanisms that the body uses in responding to the attack imposed by an infectious microorganism. This man’s  brain was so near death that it could not direct and organize bodily defenses. The useless action of “picking at thin air” was merely automation of action conducted by a sick brain. The reason for this repetitive format of action in similar cases, easily recognized by my chief, is unknown.

Chronic Infection, Poverty, and Malnutrition

Chronic tuberculosis is commonest in impoverished people with inadequate shelter and nutrition, unfortunately all too common in London at that time. This patient’s immunity, his ability to defend himself from infection, had been wrecked, permitting an onslaught of pneumonia and a death dealing staphylococcal infection. What impressed me so much was that this was defined as a sick brain, not a sick body. It was my initiation into an understanding that it is the brain that organizes defense against infections and indeed virtually any form of stress that forces us to adapt. The body is a living framework, a chassis that transports our brains, relying on a continuous brain/body dialogue that enables us to survive in a hostile environment.

Another Sick Brain

A few years after this, I was in practice in a Midland city called Leicester. One evening at the end of office hours, two young women came into my office and said “We want you to come and see dad”. When I asked what was the problem they said that he had had a cough for about 10 days. I suggested that he could wait until the following day but they insisted on an emergency house call. When I entered the house and climbed the stairs I was confronted by a middle-aged man who was kneeling on all fours on a bed under an un-shaded blue light and “picking at thin air”. He was admitted to hospital and found to have meningitis, caused by a pneumococcus, a bacterium that usually results in pneumonia. The 10 day old cough probably represented a pneumococcal infection of the lung that had spread to the meninges and caused meningitis. Like the patient described above, his sick brain killed him. I came to understand that an infection is an attacking agent, perhaps testing our right to survival. Mother Nature is simply asking us whether we are fit enough to procreate and support the survival of the species, a Darwinian concept. The phenomena that follow are the defenses going into action, a battle organized and conducted by the brain.

The Fortress Analogy

Although I have used this analogy in a previous post, it bears repeating because it illustrates the all important dominance of the brain over the body. The commander of a fortress is in a central location. Soldiers, placed on the battlements, have to spot an approaching enemy. A message is sent to the commander who must then organize the defense. If he is asleep, drunk or otherwise unable to respond, the defenses are never initiated and the fortress conquered. After it has perceived that an infecting organism has started an attack, the brain has this function over the body. Acting as commander, it raises the temperature of the body. This is because attacking micro organisms are programmed to operate at 37°C, the normal temperature of the human body. Raising the body temperature works against the efficiency, or virulence, of the infecting organism. White blood cells are the equivalent of soldiers in the fortress and messages from the brain cause them to pour out from the storage organs, increasing in number as they circulate in the blood. Lymph glands may swell because they act as traps for the organisms. Indeed, all the phenomena that we call illness really represent the complex defense systems going into action. To reduce the fever with medication like aspirin is to increase the risk of defeat by the organism. Every infection represents attack and defense. There are only three possible outcomes, a complete restitution of health, death, or a stalemate where the “battle” continues on an indefinite basis without resolution. Many organisms, known as opportunists, become aware that the defenses of the body are weak or broken. They seek their “opportunity” for winning the battle. Yeast (Candida albicans) is a well known opportunist organism and explains why this infection is so common in people who have a poor defensive program. Children with autism are good examples.

The Secret is Oxidative Metabolism in the Brain

The only way to maintain oxidative efficiency, particularly in the brain where oxygen utilization is maximal, is to eat the healthiest diet available. The noncaloric vitamins and essential minerals are vitally important and are becoming progressively insufficient in the everyday Western diet. Indeed, this seems to be so common that I visualize their supplementation as a necessity to maintain health. There can be no cutting of corners in a world where civilization is an absurd form of continuous stress. Our environment is hostile in many different ways. Assuming that the “fortress” is well-built, it is the “commander” that decides the issues as they face us on a day-to-day basis. All that the “commander” requires is energy and whether we like it or not, this has to come from ideal nutrition.

We Need Your Help

Hormones Matter needs funding now. Our research funding was cut recently and because of our commitment to independent health research and journalism unbiased by commercial interests we allow minimal advertising on the site. That means all funding must come from you, our readers. Don’t let Hormones Matter die.

Yes, I’d like to support Hormones Matter.

This article was published originally on Hormones Matter on May 9, 2016. 

Patients Are Not Statistics: The Case for Personal Stories in Medical Research

2400 views

Lucine Health Sciences and Hormones Matter have begun an important new research project to investigate the relationship between hormonal birth control and blood clots. They are surveying and interviewing women and the families of women who have suffered blood clots while using hormonal contraceptives. A big part of this study includes publishing the personal health stories of these women. (You can read my story here.) Hormones Matter has always been a place to question the status quo in healthcare and believes that one of the most powerful ways we can do that is by allowing patients to have a voice.

Patient stories, or case studies, are vital to the conversation about the safety of medications and they help drive research about health issues. I believe they are the proverbial canary in the coal mine. How else will doctors and researchers know what’s going on? Should they rely solely on the drug companies to share information that may be detrimental to their bottom line? I don’t think so, but over the years many doctors and scientists have dismissed patient stories as anecdotal and therefore not pertinent to the research conversation. They claim that the only valid forms of medical research are the double-blind placebo controlled trial or the large epidemiological investigations and nowhere is there room for the patient experience of his or her symptoms. But these studies are often cost-prohibitive or take many years (sometimes decades) to complete. What about the patients suffering now?

Case Studies Dismissed in Hormonal Birth Control Research

In my research involving birth control safety and the politics and policies surrounding hormonal birth control, the disregard for patient experience, let me rephrase that, human experience, is striking and entrenched. Even back in 1970 at the Nelson Pill Hearings, Dr. Joseph W. Goldzieher, one of the physicians testifying, was so adamant that case stories had no value that he impugned the entire British Medical Journal, the official publication of the British Medical Society and counterpart to the Journal of the American Medical Association. His claim was based on their willingness to publish an article about cervical cancer and the birth control pill when he felt that other journals “would turn it down as proving nothing.” Perhaps it is no coincidence that the British Medical Journal was the first to call attention to the problem of blood clots and the birth control pill. Dr. Goldzieher’s testimony is as follows (from page 6375 of the Nelson Pill Hearings).

Senator McIntyre: Does this statement, the statement that this journal—I am now referring to the British Medical Journal—this journal is noted for its lack of editorial discrimination, represent simply your own opinion, or is it based on some evidence?

Dr. Goldzieher: No, sir. It is my opinion exclusively, and it is based on the fact that this particular journal publishes large numbers of letters of an anecdotal nature, which are perhaps amusing, but are of dubious scientific merit, but which are then used for purposes which are not admissible. Having crept into the scientific literature as information—any statistician would call it anecdotal information—it then gets quoted and re-quoted. This is of questionable value to the medical community.

Senator McIntyre: Doctor, is it not true that letters to medical journals might very well be a manner and a way of detecting problems that may be occurring?

Dr. Goldzieher: I think there are better ways, Senator… This raw information should not, in my opinion, appear in a journal of this type… It should go to somebody which knows what to do with this information. Printing it in the British Medical Journal is no way to handle this kind of information.

Of course statistics are important. And of course we cannot make claims for all women based on the experience of one, or even a few, but in the case of hormonal birth control and blood clots (or really any of the side effects from hormonal contraception or other drugs), we are not talking about a few exceptional cases. Hundreds of thousands of people are harmed every year from medication adverse events. In fact, prescription pharmaceuticals are the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. How hormonal birth control contributes to that risk is unknown. We see from the testimony of doctors, scientists, and researchers that even in 1970 the drug manufacturers knew there were far more side effects with synthetic hormones than had been studied prior to their approval. Imagine what might have happened if more case studies were published instead of dismissed as anecdotal. Would that have driven more research and more awareness of risks?

Case Studies Drive Research

A doctor that testified after Dr. Goldzieher completely refuted Goldzieher’s stance on case studies and the British Medical Journal.

Dr. Philip A. Corfman said (in Nelson Pill Hearings, page 6400.):

“I believe the thromboembolism story provides a good example of what kinds of studies are needed. The story started with clinical observations, letters to the British Medical Journal, and case reports in Sweden and American literature. These observations brought this problem to the attention of medical science, but it was not for several years, five or six at least, until well-designed, carefully controlled studies were undertaken to show that there is indeed a positive relationship between the use of pills and [blood clots].”

 

“We are still in the early stage with the other problems that have been discussed, such as cancer, hypertension, and diabetes.”

Clearly, it takes patient stories to help detect these problems. We cannot afford to wait for an observable statistical jump in the mortality of young women or any group of people before we start investigating whether these medications are really safe. We really cannot trust the drug manufacturers to make this decision for us.

Pharmaceutical Companies Against Case Studies

Perhaps it is no surprise that when Senator McIntyre asks Dr. Goldzieher if he had ever worked for the drug companies, his response was, “I am a consultant at various times to various drug companies.”

So maybe it boils down to Dr. Clark’s testimony upon being asked if he would give his daughter the pill.

“There are two sensible answers to that. The first is, my daughters are both college age now and they would not do anything I told them to anyway. The second answer, I think, is that in a survey such as this, one is dealing with statistics. These have to be looked at in the light of a group of other statistics. When you come down to a question of the patient, that patient is no longer a statistic.” -Nelson Pill Hearings, page 6152.

Patients are Not Statistics

Patients are NOT simple statistics. This is why sharing personal stories is so vital and why we make that a priority at Hormones Matter. The manufacturers and many astute doctors and researchers knew over 40 years ago that hormonal contraceptives needed much more research. In 2016 we still don’t fully understand the risks for deadly blood clots and other serious side effects. Had women not been silenced then, perhaps we’d know more today; perhaps fewer women and their families would suffer the consequences of hormonal birth control related blood clots.

Real Risk Study: Birth Control and Blood Clots

Lucine Health Sciences and Hormones Matter are conducting research to investigate the relationship between hormonal birth control and blood clots. If you or a loved one have suffered from a blood clot while using hormonal birth control, please consider participating. We are also looking for participants who have been using hormonal birth control for at least one year and have NOT had a blood clot, as well as women who have NEVER used hormonal birth control. For more information or to participate, click here.