July 2012

Lower Risk of Endometrial Cancer for Older Moms

1925 views

A study published in The American Journal of Epidemiology found that women who gave birth to children later in life had a lower risk of endometrial cancer. Researchers at the University of Southern California School of Medicine are not sure if pregnancy at a later age leads to lower risk, or if the lower risk indicates a healthier endometrium which allows for pregnancy later in life.

Women who had children after the age of 40 had a 44% lower risk of endometrial cancer than women who had last given birth before the age of 25.

Many women that have delayed pregnancy until after 40 have done so to establish their careers, which may put older mothers in a better financial position to take care of their health than younger mothers. This monetary advantage could contribute to the reduced risk for endometrial cancer, especially since a number of women forgo medical treatment due to medical costs.

Health Costs Impact American Women

1867 views

In America, 43% of women between the ages of 19 and 64 refrained from going to the doctor or taking medicine due to medical costs, according to a survey by the Commonwealth Fund. Health costs don’t just impact those without insurance: 32% of women with health insurance avoided treatment due to high costs as well.

These statistics are worrisome, especially since women use health care so much – especially as pregnant women or mothers that visit pediatricians with children in tow. Even when these particular visits are not taken into consideration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that women are still 33% more likely than men to visit a doctor.

Will You be Left Without a Doctor?

1943 views

The New York Times looks at a critical problem growing in rural areas of our country. Will you be left without a doctor or specialist in the near future?

“The Association of American Medical Colleges estimates that in 2015 the country will have 62,900 fewer doctors than needed. And that number will more than double by 2025, as the expansion of insurance coverage and the aging of baby boomers drive up demand for care. Even without the health care law, the shortfall of doctors in 2025 would still exceed 100,000.”

 

Read the rest of the article focusing on one of the nation’s critical zone, the Imperial Valley of Southern California, here.

Is Gardasil Mandated in Your State?

4670 views

Last week I reported on the controversy of the Gardasil Vaccine produced by Merck (it is important to note that GlaxoSmithKline also makes an HPV vaccine called Cervarix). Many women left comments which confirmed my statements and research with personal stories of their once healthy daughters who are now sick and disabled from this vaccine. This week I will look at which states are mandating that school children get the vaccine and one state that passed legislation for the vaccine to be given to children as young as 12 years old without parental consent.

As I stated in my op-ed piece on the Affordable Health Care Act, I am a libertarian. One of my main concerns about the government controlling our health care is mandated vaccines. To those who think that this could never happen, the simple fact is it’s already happening in our schools and in our military. While I’m a proud Marine, I’m ashamed of the fact that the government has been known to conduct ethically questionable experiments on our troops. In my opinion, vaccines are one of those experiments and rather than do they protect the patient, they ask will the people blindly take them?

While in the Marine Corps, I was vaccinated against every possible disease that there is a vaccine for not once, but twice, sometimes even three times (somehow my shot records never made it to my medical records, which I understand is common in the service). This includes the HPV vaccine, Gardasil. When I say it was mandated, I do in fact mean that I was forced to get these vaccines. Per the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) my body was property of the US Government when I was in the service. You probably think I’m kidding; I’m not. During safety briefs before summer holiday weekends we were told to wear sunscreen (check out the dangers of sunscreen here) because if we got a sunburn while off-duty we could be charged with destruction to government property. Now, that was a little extreme and I don’t know anyone who was actually charged over a sunburn (although it wouldn’t surprise me), it was still true – we were government property. I tried to avoid the Smallpox vaccine and successfully did until we were at the airport terminal boarding the plane for Iraq, I was informed by our unit’s corpsman administering it, “If you don’t get this shot you can’t deploy.”

I sarcastically replied, “Okay,” only to turn around and see the Executive Officer (XO) standing behind me.

Not amused by my sarcasm, he said, “If you don’t get the shot I will charge you with disobeying orders Lieutenant.” He was dead serious.

Thankfully, I have not had any major complications (although the more research that I do, I think I have some ongoing side effects from the Gardasil vaccine).

State Mandates

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) school vaccine requirements are determined by individual states, a right which might be revoked now that states are mandated to enforce individuals to purchase insurance per the Federal government.

In 2006, the Michigan Senate was the first to introduce legislation (S.B.1416) requiring girls entering sixth grade to have the vaccine. The bill was not enacted. According to NCSL, “Since 2006, legislators in at least 41 states and D.C. have introduced legislation to require the vaccine, fund or educate the public about the HPV Vaccine and at least 21 states have enacted legislation, including Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Washington.”

In February 2007, Texas Governor bypassed state legislation and made an executive order that all females going into the sixth grade had to get vaccinated with Gardasil. In May 2007, state legislators introduced and passed the bill H.B. 1098 to override the executive order. 

The Virginia legislature also passed a school vaccine requirement for Gardasil in 2007. To see what legislation related to the HPV vaccines and information has been introduced to your state, see NCSL’s chart here.

No Parental Consent Necessary

Can it get worse than mandating parents to give their kids a vaccine that causes severe side effects and does nothing more than an annual pap can do to prevent cervical cancer? Of course it can. On January 1, 2012, California’s Governor Jerry Brown signed the bill AB 499 into law. It states:

“Existing law authorizes a minor who is 12 years of age or older to consent to medical care related to the diagnosis or treatment of an infectious, contagious, or communicable disease if it is related to a sexually transmitted disease. This bill would additionally authorize a minor who is 12 years of age or older to consent to medical care related to the prevention of a sexually transmitted disease.  Time-critical preventive services for sexually transmitted diseases include the hepatitis B vaccine, post-exposure prophylactic (PEP) HIV medication (which must be administered within 72 hours of exposure), and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, which, if given prior to exposure, may significantly reduce the risk of certain cancers.”

How did we get here?

This is the easy part. Look at who is benefiting the most -follow the money. In this case, the makers of the vaccines are obviously going to benefit if their product is mandated by use of all children the age of 12-26 years old. Similar to when Texas Governor Perry passed the law to mandate the HPV shot shortly after Merck contributed $6000 dollars to his campaign (amongst other ties to Merck); in California, Merck donated $39, 500 to legislators voting yea on AB 499 according to Cal Watch Dog.

The cost of one shot is $120 and the vaccine is a series of three given over the course of a year. That’s $360 for every girl and boy who gets the vaccine. In most states insurance is mandated to cover this vaccine and there are numerous state and federal programs for those who do not have insurance. With all the side effects and even deaths from this shot, why wouldn’t politicians put those tax dollars to use providing un/under-insured women access to pap smears, a screening test that can catch HPV before it develops into cancer far enough in advance that fairly simple steps can be taken to stop cancer before it even develops? Why, because Merck and GlaxoKlineSmith can’t profit from preventing cancer that way. And how much has Merck made from the Gardasil vaccine? According to CNN Money, Gardasil grossed over $1.1 billion in the first nine months on the market. Unfortunately for Merck, the initial sales momentum has flattened out and is declining. The American public are obviously not buying this vaccine, so Merck and others are going to legislators and to have it mandated instead.

What can you do?

As I always say, GET INVOLVED. Get educated. Complacency, apathy and ignorance are how we got to this point (and Citizens United).  Be wary of a bill that puts a private company’s profits above the safety and well-being of the individual, especially one that involves the health of your child. It is incumbent upon all of us to assess the safety and risks of any medication or vaccine before taking it.

Hormones MatterTM is conducting research on the side effects and adverse events associated with Gardasil and its counterpart Cervarix. If you or your daughter has had either HPV vaccine, please take this important survey. The Gardasil Cervarix HPV Vaccine Survey. 

Further Reading:
Gardasil: Miracle or Deadly Vaccine?
What about the Pap?

Think and Drink Outside the (Milk) Box

2090 views

Mark Bittman shared how milk affects him and found that there are a lot of people that also suffer a number of symptoms after consuming dairy products. The list of ailments includes irritable bowel syndrome, heartburn, migraines, acne, gall bladder issues and a slew of other health issues.

The Problem: Limited Options

Doctors don’t have much to say about milk, and the answer to your ailment is usually in the form of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescription. You know, that little drug that magically stops your body from producing stomach acid.

Well, not so magically, it’s more like a wrench in the chemical cogs of your body. The proton pump inhibitor inhibits the proton pump (hence, the name of the drug), which secretes hydrogen ions into the gastric lumen – thereby thwarting the final step in the production of stomach acid.

The Problem with PPI

The problem is that we have stomach acid for a reason: Stomach acid helps us digest proteins and absorb nutrients; and the acidic environment is also necessary for maintaining a healthy stomach. Hypochloridia, or low concentrations of stomach acid, can result in infections.

Before accepting a solution that may lead to other problems, consider drinking outside the milk box, it may be the more affordable way of treating your symptoms.

PPI Could Stand for Pretty Penny Industry

As in, that industry makes a pretty penny. We want more from doctors, but so do pharmaceutical companies. The cost of PPI prescription drugs ranges from $19 to $267 per month, and we have spent $13 billion on PPI in 2010 alone.

It seems that more emphasis should be placed on health care, as opposed to drug distribution. It’s possible that doctors are overwhelmed with too little time and too many patients, but are drugs always the answer? Well, of course not (unless you’re a drug trafficker).

The (Possible) Solution: Think/Drink Outside the (Milk) Box

The results aren’t the same for everyone, but it doesn’t hurt to eliminate your dairy intake and see if the change in your diet mitigates any symptoms you have been experiencing. Some even claim that the type of milk affects your health, so check out Where is My Milk From? and determine if these changes help.

Try drinking outside the milk box.  Let Lucine know, did it work for you? Do you wish the pharmaceutical companies would refund your money? Share your story.

Where is My Milk From?

2010 views

With all the controversy over hormones and antibiotics in milk, whether or not organic milk is really organic, and if your milk is from cloned or genetically modified cows, it’s becoming easier to just pass on dairy. However, what about those dishes that just need cheese for that finishing touch, or creamer for coffee, or yogurt (oh I LOVE yogurt) and what childhood summer day isn’t complete without ice cream? Clearly, my Indiana roots have ingrained a love for milk/dairy in me.

There has to be a better way than putting small family dairy farms out of business by boycotting dairy altogether, right? Yes! Now, thanks to the ingenious website, Where is My Milk From? you can use the dairy code listed by the expiration date and search the online database to find exactly what farm your milk, cheese, yogurt, etc., came from. Enter the code by the expiration date, for example 06-01 (the code on my organic half and half), and the site does the rest, in my case it brings up H. P. Hood LLC in Sacramento, California.

When you enter your milk code, it will bring up the name of the dairy as well as a map. I just wrote them an email suggesting they include a link to the dairy’s website if available. On the site, you can also search for local dairy farms if you want to support local farmers or take your family on an educational farm trip. My grandparents had a dairy farm – very cool field trip idea, but always check with the farm owner to set up a time to check it out. Buying local or at least from small, family owned dairies is the best way to beat industrial farms. Check it out, sit with your kids and make a game out of seeing where your dairy products come from. Wouldn’t it be great if we could do this for all our food, not just milk?! Go ahead, ask Where is my Milk From?

For more information on antibiotics, hormones and milk from cloned cows check out the article, Milk it Does a Body Good?

Breast Milk Weirdness

2391 views

I am a 49 year old woman who has had 4 ectopic pregnancies. I have never carried a child longer than about 6 weeks. I have also had a hysterectomy and am down to one ovary. I think I have started menopause 3 or 4 times already judging by the hot flashes. Now that you know my brief medical history here is the weirdness – I have breast milk.

It is not much. I occasionally leak little drops but the fullness, heaviness and soreness is there. I have had the discharge tested and nothing out of the ordinary was there – except breast milk. I have had hormone tests and everything comes back ‘normal’. There is no ‘scientific’ reason why this is occuring.

Once the doctors thought it was a side effect of the medicine I am taking for PCS, The problem with that theory is it started occuring at least 15 years before I started the medication.

Occasionally it is bothersome but I think at this point I am just used to it. I get swollen glands sometimes and it REALLY hurts but other than that I ignore it. I dont even bring it up to the doctors anymore as they automatically blame it on the medication. Am I the only one in the world with this?

Should CEO’s Disclose Pregnancy as a Medical Condition?

1440 views

Should CEO’s and top executives disclose potentially harmful hobbies and medical conditions? I have near-death experiences every morning and afternoon trying to navigate the <5 mile of interstate driving to/from the office, but I didn’t have to disclose my fears of the open roads at rush hour to any potential employer. Nor have I ever disclosed my dangerous weekend hobbies of videogames, sewing and writing in any interview. Sure, my existence doesn’t really affect the shareholders of my company like the CEO might, but it’s nice to be considered even if you are a peon, right? Of course, if I rise to the top my life would be more noteworthy. But if I get there and decide I’d like to finally start a family, do I have to disclose that information to investors and shareholders?

If the SEC’s rules only state that a company has to disclose an employee’s pregnancy under certain kinds of investigations, why is Marissa Mayer, the new CEO of Yahoo!, under fire for keeping her pregnancy from shareholders?

It was not a hidden fact. She was upfront with the Yahoo! Board of directors and still got the job. Three hours after the announcement of her appointment as CEO she formerly announced that she is 6 months pregnant, which apparently worries some.

Who is most vocal about their concerns? A woman of course – we are often our own worst enemies – Francine McKenna stated examined the laws and situation in Forbes stating, “Studies show, though, that women in their mid-to-late 30s and 40s may face some special pregnancy risks. Mayer may need more than a “few weeks” and may not be able to “work throughout it,” like she told Fortune.”

Never fear ladies, Virginia Heffernan came to shield the blows in a Yahoo! News story stating, “Pregnancy, lest anyone still wonders, is actually not an illness. It’s a sign of health, and a significant contributor to it.”

McKenna did end the article on a positive note, “So, congratulations on everything, Ms. Mayer! I’ll pray for the best – for you, your baby and the long-suffering Yahoo! shareholders.”

So, what do you think? What should CEO’s and top executives have to disclose? Do their bodies belong to the company the way our troop’s bodies belong to the government (and yes this is a valid statement, we used to joke that we could be punished via the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for getting sunburnt because it was “destruction of government property”). Is pregnancy for a woman over 35 as relevant to shareholders as Steve Job’s pancreatic tumor or Steven Appleton’s amateur piloting which led to his death? Where would we draw the line with full disclosure of our business leaders?

1 2 3 4