October 2013 - Page 2

Dexamethasone During Pregnancy Increases Ovarian Germ Cell Death

3806 views

Dexamethasone or DEX, the synthetic corticosteroid that mimics the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant effects of endogenous cortisol, has been given to pregnant women who are at risk of delivering a child with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) for almost 30 years, despite the fact there are no data indicating either its safety or efficacy, and one study from Sweden suggesting such a high risk of adverse events and long term consequences, that the study was halted and the use of the drug was banned.

Similarly without evidence, physicians who specialize in vitro fertilization (IVF) are using DEX to prevent miscarriage. There is only one small and recent study suggesting that DEX may augment ovarian response and increase follicle production for egg retrieval. There are no studies showing improvement in fertilization, implantation or pregnancy rates, or even data showing it prevents miscarriage, its supposed purpose. Indeed, IVF physicians have embraced the myth of this miracle hormone, on perhaps no more than medical hunch.

Dexamethasone and Ovarian Germ Cells

A recently published study looked at the impact of in vitro – organ culture – exposure of fetal ovaries (obtained from recent abortions), and ovary germ cell development. What they found was Dexamethasone Induces Germ Cell Apoptosis in the Human Fetal Ovary. Remember germ cells are those that are handed down at birth from our parents that contain the genetic materials needed to form ovarian follicles (eggs) for women, sperm cells for men. We know that dexamethasone impairs genital development in males, but this is the first study to look at DEX and females – and they went right to the source, germ cell development.

Typically germs cells divide in a logical sequence that eventually results in oocytes or eggs for women or sperm cells for men. In some women and men, the cell division progresses unconventionally, as a result of epigenetic factors including the health and environmental exposures of our parents, even our grandparents. In utero exposures to medications, such as DEX, vaccines and other toxins can cause errors in germ cells. Germ cell division is very highly environmentally influenced and as such, it is not a big leap to think that fetal exposure to synthetic hormones such as DEX during germ cell division – weeks 6-20 of pregnancy, would have an impact on ovarian health. Indeed, it does.

Researchers found that when the fetal ovaries were exposed to dexamethasone in culture for only two weeks, the rate of germ cell death increased, the density or total number of germ cells decreased, as did the expression of one of the genes associated with germ cell survival. This was with only two weeks of exposure. In most cases, women at risk of having a baby with CAH are given dexamethasone continuously from nine weeks through the first trimester. Those pursuing IVF are given DEX preconception through the first 10 weeks of pregnancy, though at a reduced dose compared to CAH. In both cases, fetal exposure to dexamethasone is chronic, during the most critical period of reproductive organ development and germ cell division, a fact that seems to be missed with the purveyors of this drug.

What Happens When We Alter Germ Cell Development?

While there may be limited adverse effects in the moms given dexamethasone, their offspring and potentially even their grandchildren may have varying levels of altered reproductive and sexual development, including changes in the structure and function of the reproductive organs, but also, in the brain chemistry that supports gender identity. We don’t know, however, because there have been so few studies and so little recognition of the potential dangers associated with prenatal dexamethasone, or even with prenatal hormone exposures in general.

In male rodents, exposed to dexamethasone in utero, there are significant problems: reduced penis size, malformed genito-urinary tracts, undescended or malformed testicles and even testicular germ cell cancer. Until this publication, females, animal or human, had not been studied. The fact that they observed germ cell errors, leads one to speculate that later in life, perhaps similar to the DES daughters and granddaughters, these women too will experience the congenital uterine malformations and the complement of reproductive diseases, that include various cancers. At the very least, because of the increased rate of germ cell apoptosis – cell death – observed in the present study, the researchers speculate in utero exposure to dexamethasone will elicit a higher and earlier rate of premature ovarian failure in the offspring.

What becomes abundantly clear is that we ought to stop dosing pregnant women with drugs, especially those hormonal in nature, when we have no data supporting safety or efficacy. We ought to recognize that these substances cross the placental barrier and will affect fetal development. Given medical history over the last 70 years from DES, thalidomide and now, DEX, it is clear any changes in medical practice must be initiated by women themselves. There seems no impetus from medical science to investigate before medicating pregnant women.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

Image by brgfx on Freepik.

When Did it Become Okay to Disregard Patient Pain?

3765 views

Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome / M.E., Gluten Intolerance / Celiac Disease (or other dietary intolerances), Lyme Disease, depression, anxiety and every disease that is brought on by an adverse reaction to a drug or vaccine, is very difficult to diagnose and treat. Individuals with these diseases are often disregarded and treated as if they are making up their symptoms, or choosing to be sick, or as if they are crazy, which leads me to the question – When did it become okay to disregard patient pain and suffering?

I was at a dinner party recently where a gentleman was expressing an incredulous attitude about gluten intolerance. He stated that bread has been around for thousands of years and that people have been dealing with it just fine for all that time. He didn’t see how people could suddenly start having trouble digesting gluten. This simplistic attitude fails to take into account the facts that both our bread, through GMO wheat, pesticides and processing, is different now, and that our digestive systems, because of rampant use of antibiotics, are also different now. Regardless of the causes of gluten intolerance, it is not something that you can believe in or not. People have experiences of feeling ill when they eat foods that contain gluten. To disregard their experience and to tell them that what they feel is not valid, is inexcusably arrogant and rude. Sadly, that is exactly what happens too often in healthcare today. Symptoms that are not easily understandable, recognizable by modern diagnostic tools or treatable by the medications currently available, are disregarded, and worse yet, attributed to the patient’s own mental health weakness.

The Myth of Modern Diagnostics

Perhaps disregard and disbelief emanates from the notion that if a disease isn’t detectable and it isn’t treatable, then it doesn’t exist. When pain, a disease, physical or mental dysfunction of one sort or another, is felt intensely by the patient but its source is undetectable using the methods of modern medicine, it easier to deny that the problem exists than search for solutions. Rather than question the detection methods, the diagnostics, or say “I don’t know,” many doctors, family and friends deny that there is a problem at all. The mysterious, difficult to treat illnesses is attributed to a mental health flaw or personal weakness.  It’s “all in their head,” is a common refrain; as if what is in your head is a choice or isn’t important.

It Gets Worse

For those of us with illness caused by a drug or vaccine, having our pain and suffering acknowledged is difficult at best.  Our symptoms are typically invisible and mysterious, and when we tell people about the cause of our illness we are often treated with hostility. It is as if in telling our stories about how we were hurt by a pharmaceutical, we are trying to dismantle the entire modern medical system and get rid of the good with the bad. I have experienced this repeatedly since my adverse reaction and subsequent injury from Cipro. My experience is not uncommon. Read any of the patient stories of post-Gardasil, post-Lupron or post-fluoroquinolone injury – we all suffer, and we are often treated poorly.

When one speaks out against a travesty in the medical system, he or she is often accused of being a conspiracy theorist, anti-vaccine or anti-science, even though medication interactions, errors and adverse events are the 4th leading cause of death in the U.S. There are few shades of grey. One is either pro-medicine, science, vaccine or drug, or on the lunatic fringe. This characterization is unfair, as many victims of adverse reactions to prescription drugs or vaccines thoroughly believe in the efficacy of the Scientific Method, we just dislike being an experiment gone awry.

For those who have not been harmed by a medication or vaccine, it is difficult to imagine. How could a drug that is prescribed all the time, a drug that also does some good (or it wouldn’t be prescribed), have caused such harm? How could a drug or vaccine lead to such chronic pain or illness? It is difficult to conceive. It is difficult to reconcile. Egos get involved and shackles get raised. How dare a patient, a victim, a normal person, accuse a doctor, an expert, of doing harm? What doctors don’t recognize is that we are not meaning to accuse, we are seeking help, compassion and understanding.

When Did It Become Okay to Disregard Patient Pain and Suffering?

I suspect it happened during the debate over whether or not vaccines contribute to Autism. Somewhere during that debate, which is yet on-going, it became okay to tell people that it was impossible for drugs or vaccines to cause the horrifying plethora of side-effects that they do indeed cause. It became okay to believe, despite the long list of adverse effects that accompany each pharmaceutical, that medicines and vaccines where somehow entirely safe; that because they didn’t cause ill-effects in all patients, they couldn’t cause them in some.

It’s not okay.

Drug and Vaccine Side-Effects Happen

They are serious and they should not be ignored.  Please have some compassion for the victims of adverse reactions to drugs and vaccines. Please listen to their stories and realize that they know their bodies and conditions better than anyone else. Please treat them with kindness, respect and love. They deserve no less. Most importantly, do the research necessary to find out how and why these adverse event occurred and then develop the appropriate solutions to heal these patients. Better yet, invest in safer, more personalized vaccines and medications that are only given to those who will benefit from them.

Information about Fluoroquinolone Toxicity

Information about the author, and adverse reactions to fluoroquinolone antibiotics (Cipro/ciprofloxacin, Levaquin/levofloxacin, Avelox/moxifloxacin and Floxin/ofloxacin) can be found on Lisa Bloomquist’s site, www.floxiehope.com.

What if Endometriosis Was a Men’s Health Issue?

4390 views

As a health journalist and a co-founder of Endo Warriors, a support organization for women with endometriosis, I often get asked “what is endometriosis?”

Which is funny since it is estimated that 176 million women worldwide have endometriosis and yet no one knows about this global health issue.

Sometimes I say “it’s a secondary autoimmune disease where the lining of the uterus is found outside of the uterus and throughout the abdominal cavity — to varying degrees — causing chronic pain and infertility.

And other times I say “it sucks.”

Nancy Peterson of the ERC said “If 7 million men suffered unbearable pain with sex and exercise and were offered pregnancy, castration or hormones as treatment, Endo would be a national emergency to which we would transfer the defense budget to find a cure.” And, I don’t disagree.

If 7 million American men had unbearable pain every time they ejaculated, no one would ever suggest chopping off their balls. If they went to a health clinic that also offered pregnancy prevention services, we wouldn’t shut those clinics down. If 7 million American men were in pain every time they masturbated, urinated or tried to have sex we wouldn’t tell them “it’s all in their head” or “to take the pain like a man.”  No, we would listen and try to find them a cure that didn’t include castration or drug-induced de-masculinization.

But that’s not the case.

Instead we have 7 million American women with chronic pain related to the tissue in their uterus and their menstrual cycle. 7 million American women who have pain before, during and after their menstrual cycle. 7 million American women who experience pain while exercising, having sex and going to the bathroom. So we offer them chemical-menopause and hysterectomies and when those don’t work we throw our hands up in the air and say “well, at least I tried.” Better luck in your next life, perhaps you’ll come back as a man.

The menstrual cycle is the butt of all jokes directed towards women. Bad day? Is it your period? Is Auntie Flo in town?

Seeing red? Are you on the rag?

No, actually I’m just mad that the idea of healthcare for women makes people want to cover their ears and run screaming.

Free birth control for women?

Great idea!

That is until some political pundit insinuates women should just learn to shut their legs.

Maybe instead we should learn to listen to the myriad of women on birth control for issues beyond planning pregnancies. Maybe women should just get easy access to low cost birth-control without having to recite their medical record.

October is health literacy month and when it comes to health literacy, Americans are kindergartners trying to eat the paste off their fingers.

We think Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act are two different things; getting outraged at the notion of Obamacare yet think the idea of ‘affordable’ healthcare is quite nice.

Access to low-cost health care for everyone? Let’s shutdown the government!

Rather, if we want the government out of our private healthcare, then how about they get out of our uteri as well?

Endometriosis – Not Just a Reproductive Disease

5233 views

Endometriosis is generally thought of as a reproductive system disease, probably owing to the fact that one common symptom is painful menstrual periods, and that it can cause infertility. The truth is that this is not solely a reproductive disease at all. It can affect the reproductive organs, but it also commonly affects other organ systems such as the intestines and bladder. More rarely, it can also affect areas outside of the pelvis altogether such as the sciatic nerve, the diaphragm, and lungs, and even the calf muscle. In addition to pelvic-specific symptoms such as pelvic pain, bowel and bladder dysfunction, and painful intercourse, many women with endometriosis report systemic symptoms such as fatigue and general malaise, and women with endometriosis have a higher incidence of many diseases such as autoimmune diseases, allergies, inflammatory bowel disease, and even a slightly increased risk of ovarian cancer. The links between endometriosis and these other diseases are not well understood.

Many people may be familiar with the fact that endometriosis is caused by misplaced tissue in the pelvis that forms lesions, cysts, and nodules. However, given its reputation as a reproductive disease, most people expect that it usually grows on the reproductive organs—the ovaries and the uterus. This has been found not to be the case, and even though the work demonstrating that the most common locations for lesions are not the ovaries or uterus was published in the medical literature 24 years ago, the misconception still persists to this day, even among physicians.

Dr. David Redwine, a pioneering laparoscopic surgeon, published a study of the distribution of endometriosis in the pelvis by age group and fertility in 1989. This study described the locations of endometriosis in the pelvis in 132 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The most common area where endometriosis was found, in all age groups, was the cul-de-sac, which is the area behind the uterus, between the uterus and the rectum. The next most common areas were the ligaments of the pelvis (the broad ligament, and uterosacral ligament, with the right side being involved more often than the left). After the ligaments, the bladder was most commonly involved, and then the left ovary. Then the fundus of the uterus (the top end, opposite the cervix), the sigmoid colon, the right ovary, then finally the Fallopian tubes, the round ligaments, and the abdominal wall.

This study also suggested that, contrary to the popularly held belief that endometriosis spreads to more pelvic areas over time, it does not in fact spread. Lesions can grow and deepen over time, leading to more significant symptoms and potentially organ damage. However, in this study, older women as a group did not have more areas of the pelvis involved by endometriosis than younger women, which is what would be expected if endometriosis did spread in location over time.

The most interesting thing about this study is perhaps not the results themselves, but the fact that 24 years later, the results and their implications for treatment have not been incorporated into practice by many physicians treating this disease. First of all, endometriosis as a multisystem disease requires surgical expertise that often goes beyond what most gynecologists are trained to deal with. And yet many gynecologists who do not have the surgical skills to remove endometriotic tissue from sensitive areas like the sigmoid colon still continue to treat these patients, even those with complex disease, rather than refer them to specialists.

More importantly though, the dismissal of endometriosis as simply a reproductive system disease seems to lead to a lack of understanding of the debilitating symptoms it can cause. Studies on the quality of life for women with endometriosis have shown that women still continue to suffer from frequent symptoms including chronic pain, that impair their quality of life, even after treatment for their endometriosis. The severe pain experienced by many patients with this disease is dismissed in a way that pain from other diseases doesn’t get dismissed. Nancy Petersen, a recognized patient advocate, and Founding Director of the first Endometriosis Excision Treatment Program in the U.S., has compared the pain of endometriosis to the pain of acute appendicitis. During acute episodes of endometriotic pain, patients are often offered Tylenol or naproxen by physicians—would physicians even consider offering those medications to a patient with acute appendicitis? How long will the undertreatment of endometriosis pain persist by many physicians because of the misguided perception that it’s just a “women’s problem” and therefore can’t be that serious or painful?