bad drugs

Topamax: The Drug with 9 Lives

230147 views

Is Topamax a Wonder Drug?

Over the past week alone, I have talked to several people about their doctor visits. Each one of them had a different illness and each one of them was prescribed the drug Topamax.  I cannot help but wondering, how it is possible that one medication can treat so many disparate illnesses. I suspect it cannot and the overreach is driven more by marketing than medicine. This led me to do some digging into Topamax.

What I found is not good. Topamax is prescribed for a broad scope of illnesses for which there is likely little evidence of its efficacy. Take a look at the list below.

Illnesses or Conditions for which Topamax is Prescribed

  1. Obesity1. Medicine: Topamax
  2. Seizures1. Medicine: Topamax
  3. Migraine1,2. Medicine: Topamax
  4. Impulsivity3. Medicine: Topamax
  5. Diabetes with nerve damage4. Medicine: Topamax
  6. Bipolar disorder5. Medicine: Topamax
  7. Depression6. Medicine: Topamax
  8. Alcohol addiction7: Topamax
  9. Fibromyalgia8. Medicine: Topamax

I would like to add a 10th to that: I have broken a nail…can I get Topamax?

Honestly, off-label prescribing has gone too far! Does Topamax really treat so many disparate conditions that doctors prescribe it for everything, even when it is not FDA approved for these conditions? I must add that Topamax is one of the most dangerous drugs in the prescription market today. Not only is it a diet pill made from sugar derivatives  (actually a sugar substitute) but it uses two dangerous methods (blocking both voltage dependent calcium and voltage gated sodium channels at once) to achieve what several classes of drugs normally do separately; and thus, with one medicine it affects and potentially damages the two circuits that are critical for brain function. Topamax (an anticonvulsant under additional name Topiramate (generic) and in time release Trokendi XR) is important to discuss because it was initially formulated as a diet pill. Yet over 50% of the new members who join my migraine group arrive with Topamax on their prescription list.

I have yet to find a single person on this drug who is not seriously considering dropping it due to its adverse effects, not to mention that it does not appear to work as a pain killer. Unfortunately, Topamax is difficult to quit. The most difficult problem is that doctors are under the false impression that a drug that blocks the voltage dependent calcium and potassium channels can just be easily stopped by a few days of reduction. However, since the voltage dependent calcium channel is a high voltage channel, for some people the discontinuation may end in seizures.

Evidence is also accumulating that Topamax can cause brain damage 4. Personally, I have heard of many cases where it in fact has done just that.

Topamax is a sugar substitute that failed as a diet pill but is somehow permitted by the FDA to be used for epileptic seizures. It also received approval for use against migraines. The reasons for such a turn of events is unclear; how can a drug that fails approval for a diet pill suddenly be a perfect match for seizures and migraines? Don’t we all wish for sugar pill to be a pain killer? Unfortunately, sugar or sugar substitutes do not have such serious adverse effects  as Topamax (they happen to have different ones).

Adverse effects of Topamax

If we look at the list of adverse effects associated with this drug (as provided by Wikipedia – Topamax), it is clear that Topamax is not very safe. Indeed, the list is very long.

Dizziness, Weight loss, Paraesthesia (pins and needles), Somnolence, Nausea, Diarrhea, Fatigue, Nasopharyngitis – common cold, Depression, Weight gain, Anaemia, Disturbance in attention, Memory impairment, Amnesia, Cognitive disorder, Mental impairment, Psychomotor skills impaired, Convulsion, Coordination abnormal, Tremor, Lethargy, Hypoaesthesia, Nystagmus, Dysgeusia, Balance disorder, Dysarthria, Intention tremor, Sedation, Vision blurred, Diplopia, Visual disturbance, Vertigo, Tinnitus, Ear pain, Dyspnoea, Epistaxis, Nasal congestion, Rhinorrhoea, Vomiting, Constipation, Abdominal pain, Dyspepsia, Dry mouth, Stomach discomfort, Paraesthesia oral, Gastritis, Abdominal discomfort, Nephrolithiasis, Pollakisuria, Dysuria, Alopecia (hair loss), Rash, Pruritus, Arthralgia, Muscle spasms, Myalgia, Muscle twitching, Muscular weakness, Musculoskeletal chest pain, Anorexia, Decreased appetite, Pyrexia, Asthenia, Irritability, Gait disturbance, Feeling abnormal, Malaise, Hypersensitivity, Bradyphrenia, Insomnia, Expressive language disorder, Anxiety, Confusional state, Disorientation, Aggression, Mood altered, Agitation, Mood swings, Anger, Abnormal behavior, Crystal urine present, Tandem gait test abnormal, White blood cell count decreased, Bradycardia, Sinus bradycardia, Palpitations, Leucopenia, Thrombocytopenia, Lymphadenopathy, Eosinophilia, Depressed level of consciousness, Grand mal convulsion, Visual field defect, Complex partial seizures, Speech disorder, Psychomotor hyperactivity, Syncope, sensory disturbance, Drooling, Hypersomnia, Aphasia, Repetitive speech (stuttering), Hypokinesia, Dyskinesia, Dizziness postural, Poor quality sleep, Burning sensation, Sensory loss, Parosmia, Cerebellar syndrome, Dysaesthesia, Hypogeusia, Stupor, Clumsiness, Aura, Ageusia, Dysgraphia, Dysphasia, Neuropathy peripheral, Presyncope, Dystonia, Formication (the sensation of insects crawling under the skin), Visual acuity reduced, Scotoma, Myopia, Abnormal sensation in eye, Dry eye, Photophobia, Blepharospasm, Lacrimation increased, Photopsia, Mydriasis, Presbyopia, Deafness, Deafness unilateral, Deafness neurosensory, Ear discomfort, Hearing impaired, Dyspnoea exertional, Paranasal sinus hypersecretion, Dysphonia, Pancreatitis, Flatulence, Gastrooesophageal reflux disease, Hypoaesthesia oral gingival bleeding, Abdominal distension, Epigastric discomfort, Abdominal tenderness, Salivary hypersecretion, Oral pain, Breath odour, Glossodynia, Calculus urinary, Urinary incontinence, Haematuria (blood in urine), Incontinence, Micturition urgency, Renal colic, Renal pain, Anhidrosis, Hypoaesthesia facial, Urticaria, Erythema, Pruritus generalized, Rash macular, Skin discolouration, Allergic dermatitis, Swelling face, Joint swelling, Musculoskeletal stiffness, Flank pain, Muscle fatigue, Metabolic acidosis, Hypokalaemia, Increased appetite, Polydipsia, Hypotension, Orthostatic hypotension flushing, Hot flush, Hyperthermia, Thirst, Influenza like illness, Sluggishness, Peripheral coldness, Feeling drunk, Feeling jittery, Learning disability, Erectile dysfunction, Sexual dysfunction, Suicidal ideation, Suicide attempt, Hallucination, Psychotic disorder, Apathy, Lack of spontaneous speech, Sleep disorder, Affect lability, Libido decreased, Restlessness, Crying, Dysphemia, Euphoric mood, Paranoia, Perseveration, Panic attack, Tearfulness, Reading disorder, Initial insomnia, Flat affect, Thinking abnormal, Loss of libido, Listless, Middle insomnia, Distractibility, Early morning awakening, Panic reaction, Elevated mood, Blood bicarbonate decreased, Neutropaenia, Apraxia, Circadian rhythm sleep disorder, Hyperaesthesia, Hyposmia, Anosmia, Essential tremor, Akinesia, Unresponsive to stimuli, Blindness unilateral, Blindness transient, Glaucoma, Accommodation disorder, Altered visual depth perception, Scintillating scotoma, Eyelid edema, Night blindness, Amblyopia, Calculus ureteric, Renal tubular acidosis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Erythema multiforme, Skin odour abnormal, Periorbital oedema, Urticaria localized, Limb discomfort, Acidosis hyperchloraemic, Raynaud’s phenomenon, Face edema, Calcinosis, Mania, Anorgasmia, Panic disorder, Disturbance in sexual arousal, Feeling of despair, Orgasm abnormal, Hypomania, Orgasmic sensation decreased.

The FDA Black Box on Topamax

According to the FDA and their listed label update in 2014, Topomax includes a black-box warning that has the following known adverse effects:

  • Acute myopia and secondary angle closure glaucoma: Untreated elevated intraocular pressure can lead to permanent visual loss. The primary treatment to reverse symptoms is discontinuation of TOPAMAX as rapidly as possible (5.1)
  • Visual field defects: These have been reported independent of elevated intraocular pressure. Consider discontinuation of TOPAMAX (5.2)
  • Oligohidrosis and hyperthermia: Monitor decreased sweating and increased body temperature, especially in pediatric patients (5.3)
  • Metabolic acidosis: Baseline and periodic measurement of serum bicarbonate is recommended. Consider dose reduction or discontinuation of TOPAMAX if clinically appropriate (5.4)
  • Suicidal behavior and ideation: Antiepileptic drugs increase the risk of suicidal behavior or ideation (5.5)
  • Cognitive/neuropsychiatric: TOPAMAX may cause cognitive dysfunction. Patients should use caution when operating machinery including automobiles. Depression and mood problems may occur in epilepsy and migraine populations (5.6)
  • Fetal Toxicity: TOPAMAX use during pregnancy can cause cleft lip and/or palate (5.7)
  • Withdrawal of AEDs: Withdrawal of TOPAMAX should be done gradually (5.8)
  • Hyperammonemia and encephalopathy associated with or without concomitant valproic acid use: Patients with inborn errors of metabolism or reduced mitochondrial activity may have an increased risk of hyperammonemia. Measure ammonia if encephalopathic symptoms occur (5.10)
  • Kidney stones: Use with other carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, other drugs causing metabolic acidosis, or in patients on a ketogenic diet should be avoided (5.11)
  • Hypothermia has been reported with and without hyperammonemia during topiramate treatment with concomitant valproic acid use (5.12) (FDA Topamax Label)

According to the label, Topamax is only indicated for seizures as a secondary medication in support of a primary kind and for migraines and nothing else (not even for diet anymore). Yet, I see people being prescribed this drug for all types of off-label use that are unrelated to either seizures or migraines. The large migraine group I run on Facebook grown to over 4000 migraineurs in the past two years.

Because I have found that Topamax is the #1 prescribed medicine to migraineurs when they join the group in despair and hopelessness, I have decided to designate Topamax also as the #1 medicine discussed on the series titled drugs of shame. This is apt because it affects (and often damages) the neurotransmitters (hormones of the brain) and thereby puts the whole hormonal structure of the body in chaos.

The Problem: Brain Slowing

Topamax may cause brain function slowing. Why? Topamax is a voltage dependent calcium channel blocker (also called voltage-gated calcium channel blocker), which is a key channel for neuron communication via neurotransmitter release. Topamax is systemic, meaning it doesn’t just act on a particular type of neurons but all neurons. This means that neurons that are responsible to organize how the heart beats, how the lungs function, how you blink, and how you digest are all affected by Topamax in a negative way: the neurons cannot release neurotransmitters and so the communication between hormones of the brain and the hormones of the body are broken. Many of the side effects of Topamax are so strong that migraineurs who start Topamax stop within weeks (some on day 3) of initiating this medication. The drawing below shows how voltage dependent calcium channels work and what happens when they cannot work because they are blocked.

Voltage Dependent Calcium Channel Blockers

Voltage gated calcium channels plugged and unplugged
Voltage gated calcium channels plugged and unplugged.

Figure 1. How Voltage Dependent Calcium Channels Work

 

In figure 1 you see a simplified neuron on the left and the axons of another neuron on the right. In the synaptic cleft normally neurotransmitters work like a domino effect. One neuron receives a signal from a sensory organ that stimulates the release of neurotransmitters that are specific to the type of stimulus. The neurotransmitters then get to be picked up by the neuron connected to the releasing neuron and pass the signal along. When the signal volume, intensity, frequency reaches a particular threshold, the brain sends a command to the body: wipe nose, for example.

Blocking the voltage dependent calcium channels from firing means that no neurotransmitters can be released and thus no message is passed on to the necessary number of neurons to reach the threshold. Since Topamax is systemic, every function of the body is hampered to some degree.

Neurons have five types of voltage dependent calcium channels based on voltage requirements:

  1. L-type that directs skeletal muscles, cardiac related muscle cells, endocrine cells, adrenal, etc., associated with contraction, hormone release and synaptic integration (neurons working together)
  2. P/Q-type that activate neurons and neurotransmitter and hormone release
  3. N-type works at the nerve terminals similarly to P/Q for neurotransmitter and hormone release
  4. T-type think of it as the pacemaker of the brain for firing with a particular frequency
  5. R-type that works with cerebral cells and some neurons

For each of these, the current required is different so fine-tuning is necessary. The calcium channel must go through all stages of voltage levels to be able to perform all five types of actions, as the body requires all of them. Note that when the voltage gated calcium channels are blocked, none of these 5 types of actions can properly function. The body will utilize its reserves to maintain vital functions. People who take Topamax can still breathe and their hearts beat – but they have serious issues, for example, with body cooling, which is a pretty basic, built-in automatic motor function. People who take Topamax overheat and cannot cool themselves. Most interestingly Topamax prevents the very functions a migraine brain needs for relief the most because it blocks those channels that would instruct the brain to cool the body.

In addition, Topamax blocks both voltage dependent sodium-potassium channels. I have written extensively on voltage dependent sodium-potassium channels in previous articles so here I just present a short summary. Voltage dependent (or gated) sodium-potassium channels have the critical function of sodium and potassium exchange in the cell to ensure that proper voltage is created in the cell membrane. Proper voltage is required so that the channels can open and close their gates, nutrients can enter and waste products can leave. Neurons cannot manufacture neurotransmitters without the availability of various minerals, many of which must be able to enter the neuron via voltage gated sodium-potassium channels. When these channels are not able to generate the proper action potential, nothing moves in or out of the neuron. By blocking voltage dependent channels, the high voltage needed to release the neurotransmitters is dulled as well.

Topamax robs the brain from its most important vital roles: making neurotransmitters that transmit messages and regulate brain and important autonomic body functions such as, cooling the body when it is too hot,  maintaining and appropriate heart beat, or simply making a decision1.  I think, Topamax is one of the more dangerous drugs on the market. From what I can gather from the research and my work with migraineurs, Topamax does not appear to work for pain. It only slows brain function. I would not be surprised to see researchers soon showing a connection between Topamax use and dementia. Until then, proceed with caution.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter.

 

Sources

1          Sommer, B. R., Mitchell, E. L. & Wroolie, T. E. Topiramate: Effects on cognition in patients with epilepsy, migraine headache and obesity. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders 6, 211-227, doi:10.1177/1756285613481257 (2013).

2          Nelles, G. et al. Prevention of episodic migraines with topiramate: results from a non-interventional study in a general practice setting. The Journal of Headache and Pain 11, 33-44, doi:10.1007/s10194-009-0163-x (2010).

3          Navarrete, F., Pérez-Ortiz, J. M. & Manzanares, J. Pregabalin- and topiramate-mediated regulation of cognitive and motor impulsivity in DBA/2 mice. British Journal of Pharmacology 167, 183-195, doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01981.x (2012).

4          Garvey, W. T. Phentermine and topiramate extended-release: a new treatment for obesity and its role in a complications-centric approach to obesity medical management. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 12, 741-756, doi:10.1517/14740338.2013.806481 (2013).

5          Geddes, J. R. & Miklowitz, D. J. Treatment of bipolar disorder. Lancet 381, 10.1016/S0140-6736(1013)60857-60850, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60857-0 (2013).

6          Campayo, J. G. et al. Effectiveness of topiramate for tobacco dependence in patients with depression; a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Family Practice 9, 28-28, doi:10.1186/1471-2296-9-28 (2008).

7          Johnson, B. A. & Ait-Daoud, N. Topiramate in the New Generations of Drugs: Efficacy in the Treatment of Alcoholic Patients. Current pharmaceutical design 16, 2103-2112 (2010).

8          Pereira, A. G., Michael J.; Gross, Robert A.; Posner, Kelly; Dworkin, Robert H. Suicidality associated with anti-epileptic drugs: implications for the treatment of neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia. Pain 154, 345-349 (2013).

This article was first published on September 10, 2015.

Topamax Revisited

19497 views

In September 2015, I published an article called Topamax: The Drug with 9 Lives about the myriad of side effects associated with Topamax. Since then, the article has received thousands of reads and over 180 comments. Given the traffic, I thought an update was in order. Had there been any new indications for which this drug was prescribed? Were there any new side effects recognized or any more research on the drug in general? The answer to each of these questions is yes. Since the last publication, the drug has become even more wildly prescribed with additional indications (10 thru 16 are new). Additional side effects are being reported and the research on mechanisms is growing. Below, I have updated the original article to include the new information.

Is Topamax a Wonder Drug?

Over the past week alone, I have talked to several people about their doctor visits. Each one of them had a different illness and each one of them was prescribed the drug Topamax.  I cannot help but wondering, how it is possible that one medication can treat so many disparate illnesses. I suspect it cannot and the overreach is driven more by marketing than medicine. This led me to do some digging into Topamax.

What I found is not good. Topamax is prescribed for a broad scope of illnesses for which there is likely little evidence of its efficacy. Take a look at the list below.

Updated list of conditions for which Topamax is prescribed:

  1. Obesity1
  2. Seizures1
  3. Migraine1,2
  4. Impulsivity3
  5. Diabetes with nerve damage4
  6. Bipolar disorder5
  7. Depression6
  8. Alcohol addiction7
  9. Fibromyalgia8
  10. Periventricular leukomalacia9
  11. PTSD10
  12. Essential tremor11
  13. Bulimia nervosa12
  14. OCD13
  15. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension14
  16. Cluster headaches15

As you can see, there are very few commonalities in the conditions Topamax is prescribed for; some have no connection at all. Does Topamax really treat so many disparate conditions that doctors prescribe it for everything? Topamax is prescribed for many of the above conditions off-label, without sufficient information about the drug effects and without the real informed consent of the patient. I think, off-label prescribing has gone too far.

What is Topamax?

Topamax is one of the most dangerous drugs in the prescription market today. Not only is it a diet pill made from sugar derivatives (actually a sugar substitute), but it uses two dangerous methods (blocking both voltage dependent calcium and voltage dependent sodium channels at once) to achieve what several classes of drugs normally do separately; and thus, with one medicine it affects and damages two circuits that are critical for brain function.

Topamax (an anticonvulsant under the generic name Topiramate and in time release Trokendi XR) is important to discuss because it was initially formulated as a diet pill. Yet over 50% of the new members who join my migraine group arrive with Topamax on their prescription list. I have yet to find a single person on this drug who is not seriously considering dropping it due to its adverse effects, not to mention that it does not appear to work as a pain killer or migraine preventing drug. From what I see in several fibromyalgia groups, it also doesn’t work for that.

Topamax is difficult to quit. The most difficult problem is that doctors are under the false impression that a drug that blocks the voltage dependent calcium and sodium channels can just be easily stopped by a few days of reduction. However, since the voltage dependent calcium channel is a high voltage channel, for some people the discontinuation may end in seizures.

Evidence is also accumulating that Topamax can cause brain damage4. Personally, I have heard of many cases where it has done just that.

Topamax is a sugar substitute that failed as a diet pill but is somehow permitted by the FDA to be used for epileptic seizures. It also received approval for use against migraines. The reasons for such a turn of events is unclear; how can a drug that fails approval for a diet pill suddenly be a perfect match for seizures and migraines? Don’t we all wish for sugar pill to be a pain killer? Unfortunately, sugar or sugar substitutes have different serious adverse effects as Topamax (they cause metabolic disorders).

Adverse Effects of Topamax

If we look at the list of adverse effects associated with this drug (as provided by Wikipedia – Topamax), it is clear that Topamax is not very safe. Indeed, the list is very long.

Dizziness, Weight loss, Paraesthesia (pins and needles), Somnolence, Nausea, Diarrhea, Fatigue, Nasopharyngitis – common cold, Depression, Weight gain, Anaemia, Disturbance in attention, Memory impairment, Amnesia, Cognitive disorder, Mental impairment, Psychomotor skills impaired, Convulsion, Coordination abnormal, Tremor, Lethargy, Hypoaesthesia, Nystagmus, Dysgeusia, Balance disorder, Dysarthria, Intention tremor, Sedation, Vision blurred, Diplopia, Visual disturbance, Vertigo, Tinnitus, Ear pain, Dyspnoea, Epistaxis, Nasal congestion, Rhinorrhoea, Vomiting, Constipation, Abdominal pain, Dyspepsia, Dry mouth, Stomach discomfort, Paraesthesia oral, Gastritis, Abdominal discomfort, Nephrolithiasis, Pollakisuria, Dysuria, Alopecia (hair loss), Rash, Pruritus, Arthralgia, Muscle spasms, Myalgia, Muscle twitching, Muscular weakness, Musculoskeletal chest pain, Anorexia, Decreased appetite, Pyrexia, Asthenia, Irritability, Gait disturbance, Feeling abnormal, Malaise, Hypersensitivity, Bradyphrenia, Insomnia, Expressive language disorder, Anxiety, Confusional state, Disorientation, Aggression, Mood altered, Agitation, Mood swings, Anger, Abnormal behavior, Crystal urine present, Tandem gait test abnormal, White blood cell count decreased, Bradycardia, Sinus bradycardia, Palpitations, Leucopenia, Thrombocytopenia, Lymphadenopathy, Eosinophilia, Depressed level of consciousness, Grand mal convulsion, Visual field defect, Complex partial seizures, Speech disorder, Psychomotor hyperactivity, Syncope, sensory disturbance, Drooling, Hypersomnia, Aphasia, Repetitive speech (stuttering), Hypokinesia, Dyskinesia, Dizziness postural, Poor quality sleep, Burning sensation, Sensory loss, Parosmia, Cerebellar syndrome, Dysaesthesia, Hypogeusia, Stupor, Clumsiness, Aura, Ageusia, Dysgraphia, Dysphasia, Neuropathy peripheral, Presyncope, Dystonia, Formication (the sensation of insects crawling under the skin), Visual acuity reduced, Scotoma, Myopia, Abnormal sensation in eye, Dry eye, Photophobia, Blepharospasm, Lacrimation increased, Photopsia, Mydriasis, Presbyopia, Deafness, Deafness unilateral, Deafness neurosensory, Ear discomfort, Hearing impaired, Dyspnoea exertional, Paranasal sinus hypersecretion, Dysphonia, Pancreatitis, Flatulence, Gastrooesophageal reflux disease, Hypoaesthesia oral gingival bleeding, Abdominal distension, Epigastric discomfort, Abdominal tenderness, Salivary hypersecretion, Oral pain, Breath odour, Glossodynia, Calculus urinary, Urinary incontinence, Haematuria (blood in urine), Incontinence, Micturition urgency, Renal colic, Renal pain, Anhidrosis, Hypoaesthesia facial, Urticaria, Erythema, Pruritus generalized, Rash macular, Skin discolouration, Allergic dermatitis, Swelling face, Joint swelling, Musculoskeletal stiffness, Flank pain, Muscle fatigue, Metabolic acidosis, Hypokalaemia, Increased appetite, Polydipsia, Hypotension, Orthostatic hypotension flushing, Hot flush, Hyperthermia, Thirst, Influenza like illness, Sluggishness, Peripheral coldness, Feeling drunk, Feeling jittery, Learning disability, Erectile dysfunction, Sexual dysfunction, Suicidal ideation, Suicide attempt, Hallucination, Psychotic disorder, Apathy, Lack of spontaneous speech, Sleep disorder, Affect lability, Libido decreased, Restlessness, Crying, Dysphemia, Euphoric mood, Paranoia, Perseveration, Panic attack, Tearfulness, Reading disorder, Initial insomnia, Flat affect, Thinking abnormal, Loss of libido, Listless, Middle insomnia, Distractibility, Early morning awakening, Panic reaction, Elevated mood, Blood bicarbonate decreased, Neutropaenia, Apraxia, Circadian rhythm sleep disorder, Hyperaesthesia, Hyposmia, Anosmia, Essential tremor, Akinesia, Unresponsive to stimuli, Blindness unilateral, Blindness transient, Glaucoma, Accommodation disorder, Altered visual depth perception, Scintillating scotoma, Eyelid edema, Night blindness, Amblyopia, Calculus ureteric, Renal tubular acidosis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Erythema multiforme, Skin odour abnormal, Periorbital oedema, Urticaria localized, Limb discomfort, Acidosis hyperchloraemic, Raynaud’s phenomenon, Face edema, Calcinosis, Mania, Anorgasmia, Panic disorder, Disturbance in sexual arousal, Feeling of despair, Orgasm abnormal, Hypomania, Orgasmic sensation decreased, hyper pigmentation.

The FDA Black Box on Topamax

According to the FDA and their listed label update in 2014, Topomax includes a black-box warning that has the following known adverse effects:

  • Acute myopia and secondary angle closure glaucoma: Untreated elevated intraocular pressure can lead to permanent visual loss. The primary treatment to reverse symptoms is discontinuation of TOPAMAX as rapidly as possible (5.1)
  • Visual field defects: These have been reported independent of elevated intraocular pressure. Consider discontinuation of TOPAMAX (5.2)[i]
  • Oligohidrosis and hyperthermia: Monitor decreased sweating and increased body temperature, especially in pediatric patients (5.3)
  • Metabolic acidosis: Baseline and periodic measurement of serum bicarbonate is recommended. Consider dose reduction or discontinuation of TOPAMAX if clinically appropriate (5.4)
  • Suicidal behavior and ideation: Antiepileptic drugs increase the risk of suicidal behavior or ideation (5.5)
  • Cognitive/neuropsychiatric: TOPAMAX may cause cognitive dysfunction. Patients should use caution when operating machinery including automobiles. Depression and mood problems may occur in epilepsy and migraine populations (5.6)
  • Fetal Toxicity: TOPAMAX use during pregnancy can cause cleft lip and/or palate (5.7)
  • Withdrawal of AEDs: Withdrawal of TOPAMAX should be done gradually (5.8)
  • Hyperammonemia and encephalopathy associated with or without concomitant valproic acid use: Patients with inborn errors of metabolism or reduced mitochondrial activity may have an increased risk of hyperammonemia. Measure ammonia if encephalopathic symptoms occur (5.10)
  • Kidney stones: Use with other carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, other drugs causing metabolic acidosis, or in patients on a ketogenic diet should be avoided (5.11)
  • Hypothermia has been reported with and without hyperammonemia during topiramate treatment with concomitant valproic acid use (5.12) (FDA Topamax Label)
  • Suicidal Behavior and Ideation (FDA warnings update)

According to the label, Topamax is only indicated for seizures as a secondary medication in support of a primary kind and for migraines and nothing else (not even for weight loss). Yet, I see people being prescribed this drug for all types of off-label use that are unrelated to either seizures or migraines. The migraine group I run on Facebook had over 4000 migraineurs pass through and end up without migraines and, of course, without Topamax or other migraine medications in the past over three years.

Because I have found that Topamax is the #1 prescribed medicine to migraineurs when they join the group in despair and hopelessness, I have decided to designate Topamax also as the #1 medicine discussed on the series titled drugs of shame that is a chapter in my upcoming book—expected date is August 2017. This is apt because it affects (and often damages) the neurotransmitters (hormones of the brain) and thereby puts the whole hormonal structure of the body in chaos. As far as I can tell, the damage is often permanent.

The Problem: Brain Slowing

Topamax may cause brain function slowing. Why? Topamax is a voltage dependent calcium channel blocker (also called voltage-gated calcium channel blocker), which is a key channel for neuronal communication via neurotransmitter release. Topamax is systemic, meaning it doesn’t just act on a particular type of neurons but all neurons; it cannot differentiate between voltage dependent calcium channels of the many cells. This means that neurons that are responsible to organize how the heart beats, how the lungs function, how you blink, and how you digest your food are all affected by Topamax in a negative way: the neurons cannot release neurotransmitters and so the communication between hormones of the brain and the hormones of the body are broken. Many of the side effects of Topamax are so strong that a lot of migraineurs who start Topamax stop within weeks (some on day 3) of taking this medication. The drawing below shows how voltage dependent calcium channels work and what happens when they cannot work because they are blocked.

Voltage Dependent Calcium Channel Blockers

voltage gated calcium channels plugged and unplugged

Figure 1. How Voltage Dependent Calcium Channels Work

In figure 1, you see a simplified neuron on the left and the axons of another neuron on the right. In the synaptic cleft, normally neurotransmitters work like a domino effect. One neuron receives a signal from a sensory organ that stimulates the release of neurotransmitters that are specific to the type of stimulus. The neurotransmitters then get to be picked up by the neuron connected to the releasing neuron and pass the signal along. When the signal volume, intensity, frequency reaches a particular threshold, the brain sends a command to the body: it’s hot, cool the body, for example.

Blocking the voltage dependent calcium channels from firing means that no neurotransmitters can be released and thus no message is passed on to the necessary number of neurons to reach the threshold. One of the most often noted adverse effect is the inability to stay on the sun since the body is not able to control its temperature in the heat. Since Topamax is systemic, every function of the body is hampered to some degree.

Neurons have five types of voltage dependent calcium channels based on voltage requirements:

  1. L-type that directs skeletal muscles, cardiac related muscle cells, endocrine cells, adrenal, etc., associated with contraction, hormone release and synaptic integration (neurons working together)
  2. P/Q-type that activate neurons and neurotransmitter and hormone release
  3. N-type works at the nerve terminals similarly to P/Q for neurotransmitter and hormone release
  4. T-type think of it as the pacemaker of the brain for firing with a particular frequency
  5. R-type that works with cerebral cells and some neurons

For each of these, the current required is different so fine-tuning is necessary. The calcium channel must go through all stages of voltage levels to be able to perform all five types of actions, as the body requires all of them. Note that when the voltage gated calcium channels are blocked, none of these 5 types of actions can properly function. The body will utilize its reserves to maintain vital functions. People who take Topamax can still breathe and their hearts beat – but they have serious issues with body cooling, which is a pretty basic, built-in automatic motor function. Most interestingly Topamax prevents the very functions a migraine brain needs for relief the most because it blocks those channels that would instruct the brain to cool the body.

In addition, Topamax blocks both voltage dependent sodium-potassium channels. I have written extensively on voltage dependent sodium-potassium channels in previous articles so here I just present a short summary. Voltage dependent (or gated) sodium-potassium channels have the critical function of sodium and potassium exchange in the cell to ensure that proper voltage differential is generated between the inside and the outside of the cell membrane to generate action and resting potentials. Proper voltage is required so that the channels can open and close their gates, nutrients can enter and waste products can leave. Neurons cannot manufacture neurotransmitters without the availability of various minerals, many of which must be able to enter the neuron via voltage dependent channels. When these channels are not able to generate the proper action or resting potential, nothing moves in or out of the neuron. By blocking voltage dependent channels, the high voltage needed to release the neurotransmitters is reduced as well.

Topamax robs the brain from its most important vital roles: making neurotransmitters that transmit messages and regulate brain and important autonomic body functions such as, cooling the body when it is too hot, maintaining and appropriate heartbeat, or simply making a decision. I think, Topamax is one of the more dangerous drugs on the market. From what I can gather from the research and my work with migraineurs, Topamax does not appear to work for pain. It only slows brain function. I would not be surprised to see researchers soon showing a connection between Topamax use and dementia. Until then, proceed with caution.

Share your Story

If you have a Topamax story, please consider sharing it on Hormones Matter.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter.

Sources:

  1. Sommer BR, Mitchell EL, Wroolie TE. Topiramate: Effects on cognition in patients with epilepsy, migraine headache and obesity. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders. 2013;6(4):211-227.
  2. Nelles G, Schmitt L, Humbert T, et al. Prevention of episodic migraines with topiramate: results from a non-interventional study in a general practice setting. The Journal of Headache and Pain. 2010;11(1):33-44.
  3. Navarrete F, Pérez-Ortiz JM, Manzanares J. Pregabalin- and topiramate-mediated regulation of cognitive and motor impulsivity in DBA/2 mice. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2012;167(1):183-195.
  4. Garvey WT. Phentermine and topiramate extended-release: a new treatment for obesity and its role in a complications-centric approach to obesity medical management. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. 2013;12(5):741-756.
  5. Geddes JR, Miklowitz DJ. Treatment of bipolar disorder. Lancet. 2013;381(9878):10.1016/S0140-6736(1013)60857-60850.
  6. Campayo JG, Sobradiel N, Alda M, et al. Effectiveness of topiramate for tobacco dependence in patients with depression; a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Family Practice. 2008;9:28-28.
  7. Paparrigopoulos T, Tzavellas E, Karaiskos D, Kourlaba G, Liappas I. Treatment of alcohol dependence with low-dose topiramate: an open-label controlled study. BMC Psychiatry. 2011;11:41-41.
  8. Pereira AG, Michael J.; Gross, Robert A.; Posner, Kelly; Dworkin, Robert H. Suicidality associated with anti-epileptic drugs: implications for the treatment of neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia. Pain. 2013;154(3):345-349.
  9. Follett PL, Deng W, Dai W, et al. Glutamate Receptor-Mediated Oligodendrocyte Toxicity in Periventricular Leukomalacia: A Protective Role for Topiramate. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24(18):4412-4420.
  10. Andrus MR, Gilbert E. Treatment of Civilian and Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder with Topiramate. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2010;44(11):1810-1816.
  11. Chang K-H, Wang S-H, Chi C-C. Efficacy and Safety of Topiramate for Essential Tremor: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Medicine. 2015;94(43):e1809.
  12. Hoopes SPR, Frederick W.;Hedges, Dawsom W.;Rosenthal, Norman R.;Kamin, Marc;Karim, Rezaul;Capece, Julie A.;Karvois, Debra;. Treatment of Bulimia Nervosa With Topiramate in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial, Part 1: Improvement in Binge and Purge Measures. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2003;64(11):6.
  13. Van Ameringen M, Patterson B. Topiramate augmentation in a patient with obsessive–compulsive disorder. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience : JPN. 2015;40(5):E31-E32.
  14. Çelebisoy N, Gökçay F, Şirin H, Akyürekli Ö. Treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension: topiramate vs acetazolamide, an open-label study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2007;116(5):322-327.
  15. Láinez MJA, Pascual J, Pascual AM, Santonja JM, Ponz A, Salvador A. Topiramate in the Prophylactic Treatment of Cluster Headache. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2003;43(7):784-789.

[i] This particular adverse effect was listed on the package at the first publishing time but since has been removed. It can still be located in various sites

Image source: Pixabay.

DES – The Drug to Prevent Miscarriage Ruins Lives of Millions

32525 views

Let’s rewind time. We’re in 1970. My mum, like millions of other women, puts all her trust and last hopes of carrying a successful pregnancy in the hands of health professionals. She accepts to take a drug recommended and prescribed in good faith by her doctor without knowing that years later it would have devastating consequences not only on her health but the health of her daughter and possibly her grand-children. She takes Diethylstilbestrol (or DES in short), the first synthetic man made female sex hormone (oestrogen) widely prescribed for public use in the mistaken belief that it would prevent miscarriage and loss.

Now let’s fast forward. We’re in 2001 three decades after my mum took DES. I’m in a hospital ward anxiously waiting for the results of a scan. I’m pregnant. “We’re so sorry, but you know 1 out of 5 pregnancies end in miscarriage. You should try again” I’m told. My head is spinning. What did my Mum said again? DES, yes DES, I remember now. She mentioned when I was just a teenage girl that research had confirmed that the drug taken throughout her pregnancy to prevent miscarriage was responsible for all sorts of dreadful health issues including a rare form of vaginal cancer, infertility and high risks pregnancies. What if this was responsible for the loss of my baby, I ask. “DES? What is DES? Never heard of it!” replies the consultant on duty that day. ”If you keep miscarrying, we’ll investigate further” he adds.

I don’t listen and seek help and advice from an organization founded by a mother who had been prescribed this drug and advocates for the many families affected by DES. A Professor, expert in fertility treatment, confirms a congenital uterine malformation typical of DES exposure and confirms that I’m a DES daughter, one amongst millions of other women whose mothers took Diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy.

If you were born or pregnant in the US between 1938 and 1971, and until the mid-’80s in some European countries, you may have been exposed to DES too and you may suffer from the consequences of this drug without even knowing it. Diethylstilbestrol has put the mothers prescribed the drug, their daughters and sons exposed in utero, and potentially their grandchildren due to the trans-generational effects of this synthetic hormone, at risk for serious health problems including but not limited to: structural damages in reproductive organs, high risk pregnancies and miscarriage, cancer, infertility and possible immune system impairment. Many other suspected effects are still awaiting further research but funding is critically missing.

Often referred to as the “Silent Thalidomide” by the media, diethylstilbestrol is considered as the world’s first drug scandal. Despite evidence of its ineffectiveness and danger, it continued to be prescribed to pregnant women beyond 1971 when the first link between DES and a rare form of vaginal cancer (clear cell adenocarcinoma) was formally established in Boston, Massachusetts.

Even though this drug was given to pregnant women decades ago, it affects and continues to affect millions of families today and possibly for many years to come. Yet, diethylstilbestrol has been and still is a well-kept secret, a taboo subject not only in families but within the medical community too.

No drug manufacturers, health authorities, nor governments have ever taken responsibility for the long term health side effects of this drug.

Don’t Pharmaceutical companies have a responsibility to their consumers to provide a product that is safe?

Four sisters recently filed a lawsuit against drug manufacturer Eli Lilly. They feel that their breast cancer was a direct result of Eli Lilly’s negligence. Eli Lilly has never accepted responsibility nor apologized for the DES tragedy, even though the company has paid millions in out-of-court settlements and verdicts to DES Daughters and Sons who suffered injuries from their exposure. The Melnick sisters reached a settlement with the drug company a few weeks ago, but Eli Lilly has not accepted any responsibility. Outraged by Eli Lilly’s failure to fess up on DES, Patricia Royall, a plaintiff in one of the 72 pending DES breast cancer lawsuits in Boston federal court and the District of Columbia, is now calling on the general public to sign a petition urging the drug manufacturer to apologize for the DES tragedy. From all corners of the globe, Australia to France, the UK to the Netherlands, Ireland to the USA, DES victims are crying out for justice.

Diethylstilbestrol is a world drug disaster yet very few people know about its tragic health consequences or have even heard about it. Public health awareness campaigns are vital to reaching out to the millions of people who have been exposed to this harmful drug. People who are not aware of their exposure to DES are not receiving proper medical treatment, or making truly informed decisions about their healthcare, as a result. It is equally important to educate the next generations of health professionals who have never heard of DES so they can provide adequate care to DES victims for years to come.

DES DaughterDES is not something of the past. People who have been exposed to this drug years ago are battling with health issues and fighting for their lives as I’m writing this blog post. Who knows what health problems the grandchildren of the mothers who were prescribed this drug will have to deal with as they grow up. I want my daughters to receive adequate medical care and monitoring if they ever have to suffer the consequences of this drug. This is why together with my husband we support the great work done by the very few International DES Action Groups who are providing valuable information and are advocating for the DES victims.

If you’re concerned that you may have been exposed to DES, please don’t let doctors dismiss your concerns. Contact your local DES Action Group for professional advice and guidance.  Connect with me and other DES daughters via my blog: DES Daughter Network and my website: Journal of a DES Daughter. You have the right to know.

We need your help.

Hormones Matter needs funding now. Our research funding was cut recently and because of our commitment to independent health research and journalism unbiased by commercial interests we allow minimal advertising on the site. That means all funding must come from you, our readers. Don’t let Hormones Matter die.

Yes, I’d like to support Hormones Matter.

This article was published previously on Hormones Matter in February 2013. 

Out of Balance: The Unbridled Power of the Pharmaceutical Industry

4185 views

A staggeringly large number of people are hurt or killed by pharmaceuticals each year. Medical mistakes and pharmaceutical induced injuries are the 4th most common cause of death in American hospitals (1).

Casualties reveal that the medical system is broken, and it is broken in ways that are systemic, complex and difficult to fix.

Every large system that works well has a foundation of checks and balances that keeps power from being too concentrated. Unchecked power corrupts – it has been shown to be true millions of times throughout history. The need for checks and balances on the power of pharmaceutical companies is just as great as the need for checks and balances on the power of any given branch of the government. There are organizations, individuals and institutions, that should be checking and balancing the power of pharmaceutical companies, and keeping them from maiming and killing thousands of people each year; but those organizations and institutions are failing. They are not keeping the pharmaceutical industry in check, and thus, the problems with the pharmaceutical industry are systemic.

Here is a list of institutions and groups of people who are supposed to be protecting the public from the pharmaceutical companies, but who are not:

The FDA does not Regulate the Pharmaceutical Industry

It’s self-evident that the FDA is failing. Deaths from pharmaceuticals don’t get to the point where thousands of people needlessly die each year while using drugs as prescribed when a regulatory agency is doing its job. “Every week, about 53,000 excess hospitalizations and about 2400 excess deaths occur in the United States among people taking properly prescribed drugs to be healthier. One in every five drugs approved ends up causing serious harm, while one in ten provide substantial benefit compared to existing, established drugs(2).” This sorry state of affairs doesn’t happen with a regulatory agency that is working properly to protect the people.

Most people assume that the FDA tests drugs for safety. They don’t. The FDA reviews tests performed by the pharmaceutical companies, the same company that developed the drug and stands to profit from the drug(3). It’s a system that is rife with conflicts of interest and perverse incentives that allow dangerous and/or ineffective drugs onto the market.

The FDA is approving drugs that are linked to cancer in clinical trials (new diabetes drugs, Farxiga and Invocana showed high incidence of bladder cancer in clinical trials (4). CANCER. When it is discovered after drugs are released onto the market that they are cancer-causing, the FDA doesn’t remove them from the market or insist that pharmaceutical companies try again to make a better formula that DOESN’T CAUSE CANCER, they simply make the warning label longer – as is the case with TNF inhibitors like Humira and Enbrel (5,6).

Those at the FDA are apparently incapable of making connections between drugs and chronic diseases. When the FDA added the risk of permanent peripheral neuropathy to the 43 page warning label for fluoroquinolone antibiotics, they noted that the mechanism for action that caused the peripheral neuropathy was mitochondrial dysfunction. There are hundreds of studies that link mitochondrial dysfunction to every chronic disease of modernity (Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s, autoimmune diseases, chronic fatigue syndrome / M.E., fibromyalgia, etc.), but rather than restrict the use of dangerous mitochondria damaging drugs like fluoroquinolones, they just increased the length of the label, and people keep getting sick from these drugs (7).

The FDA is not looking out for the people. The notion that they are actually protecting people from dangerous drugs is laughable.

The Courts Rule in Favor of the Pharmaceutical Industry

If you’re hurt by a drug, you can sue, right? After all, the United States is the most litigious country in the world. People sue for all sorts of things all the time, surely those who are legitimately hurt by pharmaceuticals have legal recourse, right? And the legal system must be keeping pharmaceutical companies from hurting people, right?

It’s not that easy.

If the “side-effect” of a drug that you suffer from is listed on the warning label for the drug, you can’t sue the drug companies for failure to warn. So, for example, if you develop a severe psychiatric illness like bipolar disorder or severe depression after taking Chantix, an anti-smoking drug, you can’t sue the manufacturer of the drug, even if your declined mental health ruins your life, because the warning label for Chantix says that serious psychiatric ill-effects have followed treatment with Chantix (8).

If the side-effect that you suffer from isn’t listed on the warning label for that drug, you’re not much better off than you are if it is. If it’s not listed on the warning label, the connection between the drug and the disease is not established and proving that the drug caused the adverse reaction is close to impossible.

Additionally, those who take generic drugs have no legal recourse against the manufacturers of the drugs, thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court. On June 24, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that generic drug manufacturers could not be held liable for the effects of the pharmaceuticals that they manufacture. A New York Times piece pointed out that, “The decision is a significant victory for the generic drug industry, but further narrows the recourse for people who are injured by such drugs” (9). People who have been hurt by a drug manufactured by a generic drug company have no recourse now – no chance for justice – regardless of how horribly they are harmed by a drug. Lawyers aren’t even taking cases of people hurt by generic drugs.

The justice system is doing a horrible job at providing justice for those who have been hurt by pharmaceuticals. In not getting justice for the people who have been hurt by pharmaceuticals, they are giving the pharmaceutical industry no incentive to stop hurting people.

Media Ties to the Pharmaceutical Industry Hamper Objectivity

If you read a newspaper, news based magazine, or watch television news, you will be bombarded with advertisements for pharmaceuticals. A quick review of a few issues of Time, U.S. News and World Report and Reader’s Digest revealed that 15% of the advertisements in those “news” magazines were for pharmaceuticals. Television news programs are even worse with constant bombardment of advertisements for antidepressants, erectile dysfunction drugs, etc.  How can we expect the news media to cover the dangers of drugs and the malfeasance of the pharmaceutical industry when advertisements from the pharmaceutical industry provide a significant portion of the revenue for those media sources?

I don’t believe that the media can be objective toward those who ensure their livelihood. Don’t bite the hand that feeds you, as they say – and the mainstream media is well-fed by the pharmaceutical industry.

Doctors and the Pharmaceutical Industry

Doctors generally know too little about the drugs that they prescribe. Most are not pharmacologists and they count on the FDA to tell them whether or not a drug is safe to use.

In some ways, I feel sorry for doctors. They don’t intend to hurt people with pharmaceuticals – they mean to help people with pharmaceuticals. There are good drugs that do what they’re supposed to do and even save lives. But the entire medical profession seems to have lost critical thinking skills when it comes to evaluating the appropriate use of powerful drugs. Drugs can do harm, and many pharmaceuticals do more harm than good. Admitting that will not mean that any physician has to have his or her prescription pads taken away.

There is an appropriate time and place for every type of health therapy – nutritional, herbal, pharmaceutical, etc. – but the dependence of physicians on the exclusive use of pharmaceuticals has made them so entrenched in the system, and so dependent on the pharmaceutical industry, that the questioning of the appropriateness of drug therapies is rarely done. Doctors aren’t keeping the pharmaceutical companies in check by questioning them and refusing to tolerate the inordinate number of harmful drugs going through their office because doctors cannot operate without those dangerous drugs. It’s a sad state of affairs.

Some push-back on the pharmaceutical industry by doctors is entirely appropriate. They should push back on the pharmaceutical industry – for their patients and for their conscience.

Pharmacists and the Pharmaceutical Industry

Pharmacists understand the mechanisms of drug actions. They are trained in pharmacology. They are the gate-keepers for dispensing drugs to the public. I cannot, for the life of me, figure out why there isn’t more uproar among them about harmful drugs.

Scientists and the Pharmaceutical Industry

Everything that I know about biochemistry, cellular biology, how drugs interact with cells, etc. is from journal articles written by scientists. I thank them very much for their work. It is with science that the fraud and crimes against humanity perpetrated by the pharmaceutical industry will be revealed.

Unfortunately, the pharmaceutical and agricultural biochemical corporations have a strangle-hold on much of the work being done by scientists. Objectivity and scientific principles are lost as health research is corrupted by corporate funding at multiple levels. Selection bias has been demonstrated repeatedly, showing that negative results in drug research are not published. Scientists are put in a difficult position as their status and livelihood depend on publishing (publish or perish) so, they must only publish positive findings. Moreover, much of their work and their institution’s research funding comes from the pharmaceutical companies, either directly with drug development or testing grants or indirectly via the NIH inasmuch as the NIH won’t fund adverse events research but only that which has the possibility of a drug discovery. Researchers who dare to question the safety of a particular drug are often disciplined by their institutions for fear that the institutions will lose the millions of dollars drug companies funneled to them, and then if the researcher does speak out, the personal campaigns against them by the drug companies will end their research career. It’s a very untenable position for anyone with a brain and a conscience.

Even though I understand that research scientists are in a difficult position, I get frustrated with the lack of screaming and grand-standing that I don’t see from the scientific community. Scientists have the tools to see the damaging effects of pharmaceuticals. They have the intelligence to connect the dots. They have the credibility to make a difference in people’s lives. They have the ability to save lives. But most aren’t screaming about the harm caused by drugs, partly for the reasons listed above, and partly because they seem to be stuck in an outdated mode of caution and gentlemanliness. They know that they can say that a drug is associated with a higher incidence of cancer, but they are reluctant to say that the drug CAUSED the cancer. They can say that a drug had hugely harmful effects on the cells of rats, but they are reluctant to make any recommendations about human use of those drugs based on those studies of rats – even though the rats are effectively canaries in the coalmine and screaming about hurt rats may prevent future hurt humans. I understand this caution and the rules of science. But it would be really nice if more scientists were using their credibility and intelligence to push back against the pharmaceutical industry.

The People Must Resist Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing

Without the FDA, the media, the justice system, doctors, pharmacists or scientists standing up to the pharmaceutical companies and putting a check on their (currently unmitigated) power, patients are left to fend for themselves. Unfortunately, most patients don’t have the time or capability of doing the necessary research to determine the safety of any given drug. Patients depend on the system to have checks and balances to keep them safe, but those systems that are supposed to be providing checks and balances are failing.

I don’t think that the pharmaceutical companies are evil entities that are conspiring to decrease the world’s population. But I do think that they are profit motivated businesses with obligations to enrich their shareholders, and that their obligations to enrich their shareholders are in direct conflict with any mission of making the people that they sell drugs to healthy. There is an inherent conflict of interest born from the fact that sick, especially chronically ill, people are the best customers of pharmaceutical companies. A poisoned, sick, population is in nobody’s interest except those who leach money from the ill.

Systematic corrections are needed to fix the problem of an obscene numbers of casualties from the pharmaceutical industry.

Stopping the pharmaceutical companies from hurting people is the right thing to do.  I hope that the FDA, the media, the justice system, doctors, pharmacists and scientists start doing so.

We Need Your Help

More people than ever are reading Hormones Matter, a testament to the need for independent voices in health and medicine. We are not funded and accept limited advertising. Unlike many health sites, we don’t force you to purchase a subscription. We believe health information should be open to all. If you read Hormones Matter, like it, please help support it. Contribute now.

Yes, I would like to support Hormones Matter. 

Sources:

  1. Journal of American Medicine, “Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients
  2. Harvard University Edmond J. Safra Center For Ethics, “Risky Drugs: Why the FDA Cannot be Trusted
  3. FDA Drug Development and Approval Process
  4. Huffington Post Healthy Living, “Farxiga, Just Approved by FDA, Uses New Approach to Treat Diabetes
  5. Medscape Medical News, “FDA Safety Changes: Humira
  6. FDA Warning Label: Humira
  7. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Pharmacovigilance Review, April 17, 2013, “Disabling Peripheral Neuropathy Associated with Systemic Fluoroquinolone Exposure
  8. Chantix Warning Label
  9. New York Times, “In 5-4 Ruling, Justices Say Generic Makers Are Not Liable for Design of Drugs

Image by wirestock on Freepik

Define Better: Too Many Prescription Medications for Kids

2456 views

Medication Madness

This hard-edged rap video flew around the social media outlets last week- Define Better. The music video tackles the issue of over-medicating our children and calls into question the industry that regularly pushes to expand its market share for old drugs. Two markets that have seen an exponential increase in market share, particularly for psychiatric drugs, are women (including pregnant) and children.

Prescription Medications during Pregnancy

Where in generations past, pregnant women were prohibited from taking any medications lest these meds cross the placenta and harm the fetus. As of 2006, 30% of all pregnant women were taking at least one psychotropic medication (DeVane et al. 2006), despite the documented birth defects and other complications associated with these medications.

Giving Children Antidepressant Medications

Similarly, it was unheard of to prescribe antidepressants to children under the age of 16; not only because these medications have neither been tested nor proved effective in children, but because they cause ‘paradoxical’ reactions – elicit suicidal ideation and suicide itself.

A recent report in the Journal Health Affairs supports these claims. Researchers found that “between 1996 and 2007, the number of visits where individuals were prescribed antidepressants with no psychiatric diagnoses increased from 59.5 percent to 72.7 percent and the share of providers who prescribed antidepressants without a concurrent psychiatric diagnosis increased from 30 percent of all non-psychiatrist physicians in 1996 to 55.4 percent in 2007.” Similarly, another study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that the very medications drug companies marketed most aggressively frequently offered the least clinical benefit and had the potential for the most harm to patients.

Understand what these two reports are saying, drug companies are aggressively marketing those drugs that offer the fewest clinical benefits and the most harm to patients – and we’re buying them! Whether we’re buying them because our doctors prescribed them readily or because we’re demanding the drugs from our doctors, is unclear. What is clear, is that we’ve relinquished personal control over our own health and our children’s health to marketing. We need to regain that control and to do so requires that we ‘Define Better’.

DeVane, CL, Stowe ZN, Donovan JL, Newport DJ, Pennell PB, Ritchie JC, Owens MJ, Wang, JS. Therapeutic drug monitoring of psychoactive drugs during pregnancy in the genomic era: challenges and opportunities. J Psychopharm. 2006; S 20(4):54-59.

Are We Marks? The Greed and Chicanery of 21st Century Corporate Culture

2496 views

Corporate Culture has Run Afoul

By now everyone is aware of Bank of America’s latest in a long stream of fee gouging practices- the $5 debit card fee. This is on top of an endless array transaction fees charged to customers that generate billions in profits annually, and of course, the billions from the bailouts and the foreclosure crisis. Although blatantly evident on Wall Street, the shift in corporate ideology that rewards chicanery pervades every aspect of American life, especially healthcare and most especially women’s and children’s healthcare.

We’re at a place in time where corporations would rather spend billions lobbying favorable regulations and billions more fighting and paying out consumer or patient lawsuits for faulty products than build a quality product or provide a quality service in the first place. How else does one explain the medical marketing of dangerous drugs to otherwise healthy women– think HRT, Yaz and Yasmin, Prozac, Wellbutrin and other anti-depressants to pregnant women (and to rest of the un-depressed population for that matter)? How else does one explain why incredibly dangerous products like Yaz/Yasmin are still on the market despite having more serious adverse events than drugs already off the market because of safety issues (VIOXX) (see  comparison of Yaz side effects below, from www.adverseevents.com  or click on the graphic below).  How else do we explain why it took so many years to remove DES from the market place despite evidence of both teratogenic and carcinogenic effects from the onset or why HRT, was allowed to be marketed as the magic pill that cured all, without any evidence whatsoever? How else do we explain why we not only bought these drugs but demanded them (besides the fact that many are addictive)? How else does one explain that in the 21st century only 30% of practice guidelines for obstetricians and gynecologists are evidence based? Thirty-percent!!!


I guess one really doesn’t need evidence if the treatment choices are limited to bad and worse. Indeed, it’s probably a good thing that more people, patients and doctors alike, don’t question the prescribing practices, the medical efficacy or the very real risk some of these meds pose. Maybe we are marks.

Where did this racket of corporate miscreance come from? I would argue it came from us, or rather because of us. For some reason, we the consumer, the citizen, the patient, the physician, the politician, checked our common sense and personal responsibility at the door of mega-marketing. Somehow we convinced ourselves that we deserved everything, but had to pay for nothing. We abdicated our personal responsibility for our own health, happiness and financial stability to others. And now we are facing the consequences: ill-health, physical and economical, personal and global.

The economic crash exposed the fealty of our financial system and is exposing the very real flaws in our corporate, insurance-based, medical system. The system has taken medical decision-making away from the physician and the patient and placed it squarely in the hands of pharma marketing engines and insurance companies. We’re at a juncture in time, where the sheer economic reality of buying pills to solve all medical problems, is contrasted by the fact that many simply cannot afford their meds anymore and must look to alternative solutions for health.

With all crises comes innovation and change, maybe with this one, we can get back to the “first do no harm” principle of medicine. Maybe we can get back to personal responsibility for health. I think Bill Maher said it best “We’ll stop being sick,when we stop making ourselves sick.”

For a laugh-out loud assessment of modern healthcare by Bill Maher click here.

To look up or report adverse reactions to common medications go to: www.adverseevents.com

Warning: This site does not offer medical advice. If you have questions about your medications or your health, please consult your physician. Do not attempt to discontinue any medication without physician approval and supervision.